不同情绪状态下双相情感障碍中与状态和特质相关的功能障碍:图式理论研究。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-01-18 Print Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1503/jpn.230069
Yifan Chen, Pengfei Zhao, Chunyu Pan, Miao Chang, Xizhe Zhang, Jia Duan, Yange Wei, Yanqing Tang, Fei Wang
{"title":"不同情绪状态下双相情感障碍中与状态和特质相关的功能障碍:图式理论研究。","authors":"Yifan Chen, Pengfei Zhao, Chunyu Pan, Miao Chang, Xizhe Zhang, Jia Duan, Yange Wei, Yanqing Tang, Fei Wang","doi":"10.1503/jpn.230069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The interplay between state- and trait-related disruptions in structural networks remains unclear in bipolar disorder (BD), but graph theory can offer insights into global and local network changes. We sought to use diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) and graph theory approaches to analyze structural topological properties across distinct mood states and identify high-risk individuals by examining state- and trait-related impairments in BD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied changes in white matter network among patients with BD and healthy controls, exploring relationships with clinical variables. Secondary analysis involved comparing patients with BD with unaffected people at high genetic risk for BD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 152 patients with BD, including 52 with depressive BD (DBD), 64 with euthymic BD (EBD) and 36 with manic BD (MBD); we also included 75 healthy controls. Secondary analyses involved 27 unaffected people at high genetic risk for BD. Patients with DBD and MBD exhibited significantly lower global efficiencies than those with EBD and healthy controls, with patients with DBD showing the lowest global efficiencies. In addition, patients with DBD displayed impaired local efficiency and normalized clustering coefficient (γ). At a global level, γ correlated negatively with depression and anxiety. Compared with healthy controls, and across mood states, patients with BD showed abnormal shortest path lengths in the frontolimbic circuit, a trend mirrored among those at high genetic risk for BD.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Considerations include medication effects, absence of recorded BD episode counts and the cross-sectional nature of the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mood-specific whole-brain network metrics could serve as potential biomarkers in BD for transitions between mood states. Moreover, these findings contribute to evidence of trait-related frontolimbic circuit irregularities, shedding light on underlying pathophysiological mechanisms in BD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","volume":"49 1","pages":"E11-E22"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10803102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State- and trait-related dysfunctions in bipolar disorder across different mood states: a graph theory study.\",\"authors\":\"Yifan Chen, Pengfei Zhao, Chunyu Pan, Miao Chang, Xizhe Zhang, Jia Duan, Yange Wei, Yanqing Tang, Fei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1503/jpn.230069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The interplay between state- and trait-related disruptions in structural networks remains unclear in bipolar disorder (BD), but graph theory can offer insights into global and local network changes. We sought to use diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) and graph theory approaches to analyze structural topological properties across distinct mood states and identify high-risk individuals by examining state- and trait-related impairments in BD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied changes in white matter network among patients with BD and healthy controls, exploring relationships with clinical variables. Secondary analysis involved comparing patients with BD with unaffected people at high genetic risk for BD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 152 patients with BD, including 52 with depressive BD (DBD), 64 with euthymic BD (EBD) and 36 with manic BD (MBD); we also included 75 healthy controls. Secondary analyses involved 27 unaffected people at high genetic risk for BD. Patients with DBD and MBD exhibited significantly lower global efficiencies than those with EBD and healthy controls, with patients with DBD showing the lowest global efficiencies. In addition, patients with DBD displayed impaired local efficiency and normalized clustering coefficient (γ). At a global level, γ correlated negatively with depression and anxiety. Compared with healthy controls, and across mood states, patients with BD showed abnormal shortest path lengths in the frontolimbic circuit, a trend mirrored among those at high genetic risk for BD.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Considerations include medication effects, absence of recorded BD episode counts and the cross-sectional nature of the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mood-specific whole-brain network metrics could serve as potential biomarkers in BD for transitions between mood states. Moreover, these findings contribute to evidence of trait-related frontolimbic circuit irregularities, shedding light on underlying pathophysiological mechanisms in BD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"E11-E22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10803102/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.230069\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.230069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:双相情感障碍(BD)患者的结构网络中与状态和特质相关的破坏之间的相互作用仍不清楚,但图论可以提供有关全局和局部网络变化的见解。我们试图利用弥散张量成像(DTI)和图论方法来分析不同情绪状态下的结构拓扑特性,并通过研究双相情感障碍中与状态和特质相关的损伤来识别高危个体:我们研究了 BD 患者和健康对照组白质网络的变化,并探讨了与临床变量的关系。二次分析包括将 BD 患者与未受影响的 BD 高遗传风险人群进行比较:我们纳入了 152 名 BD 患者,其中包括 52 名抑郁型 BD (DBD)、64 名优郁型 BD (EBD) 和 36 名躁狂型 BD (MBD);我们还纳入了 75 名健康对照者。二次分析包括 27 名未受影响的 BD 高遗传风险人群。DBD 和 MBD 患者的全局效率明显低于 EBD 患者和健康对照组,其中 DBD 患者的全局效率最低。此外,DBD 患者的局部效率和归一化聚类系数(γ)也有所下降。在整体水平上,γ 与抑郁和焦虑呈负相关。与健康对照组相比,在不同的情绪状态下,BD 患者的前肢回路最短路径长度异常,这一趋势反映在 BD 高遗传风险人群中:局限性:考虑因素包括药物影响、没有记录BD发作次数以及研究的横断面性质:结论:情绪特异性全脑网络指标可作为潜在的生物标志物,用于BD患者情绪状态之间的转换。此外,这些发现有助于证明与性状相关的前边缘回路不规则性,从而揭示 BD 的潜在病理生理机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
State- and trait-related dysfunctions in bipolar disorder across different mood states: a graph theory study.

Background: The interplay between state- and trait-related disruptions in structural networks remains unclear in bipolar disorder (BD), but graph theory can offer insights into global and local network changes. We sought to use diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) and graph theory approaches to analyze structural topological properties across distinct mood states and identify high-risk individuals by examining state- and trait-related impairments in BD.

Methods: We studied changes in white matter network among patients with BD and healthy controls, exploring relationships with clinical variables. Secondary analysis involved comparing patients with BD with unaffected people at high genetic risk for BD.

Results: We included 152 patients with BD, including 52 with depressive BD (DBD), 64 with euthymic BD (EBD) and 36 with manic BD (MBD); we also included 75 healthy controls. Secondary analyses involved 27 unaffected people at high genetic risk for BD. Patients with DBD and MBD exhibited significantly lower global efficiencies than those with EBD and healthy controls, with patients with DBD showing the lowest global efficiencies. In addition, patients with DBD displayed impaired local efficiency and normalized clustering coefficient (γ). At a global level, γ correlated negatively with depression and anxiety. Compared with healthy controls, and across mood states, patients with BD showed abnormal shortest path lengths in the frontolimbic circuit, a trend mirrored among those at high genetic risk for BD.

Limitations: Considerations include medication effects, absence of recorded BD episode counts and the cross-sectional nature of the study.

Conclusion: Mood-specific whole-brain network metrics could serve as potential biomarkers in BD for transitions between mood states. Moreover, these findings contribute to evidence of trait-related frontolimbic circuit irregularities, shedding light on underlying pathophysiological mechanisms in BD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience publishes papers at the intersection of psychiatry and neuroscience that advance our understanding of the neural mechanisms involved in the etiology and treatment of psychiatric disorders. This includes studies on patients with psychiatric disorders, healthy humans, and experimental animals as well as studies in vitro. Original research articles, including clinical trials with a mechanistic component, and review papers will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信