家族企业、管理控制和数字化效应

IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Stefano Amato, Laura Broccardo, Andrea Tenucci
{"title":"家族企业、管理控制和数字化效应","authors":"Stefano Amato, Laura Broccardo, Andrea Tenucci","doi":"10.1108/md-03-2023-0347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p> This study investigates the association between family firm status and the maturity level of management control systems (MCSs) by considering the moderating effect of process digitalization.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p> The authors conducted an empirical analysis on a sample of 106 Italian firms, utilizing both ordinary least squares and ordered logistic regression in this study.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>By resorting to the MCS maturity model proposed by Marx <em>et al.</em> (2012), the empirical findings reveal that family firms do not differ from their nonfamily counterparts regarding MCS maturity. Furthermore, the degree of process digitalization is positively associated with the probability of adopting IT-related technologies in MCSs. Digitalization negatively moderates the relationship between family firm status and MCS maturity, resulting in family firms exhibiting a lower MCS maturity level than their nonfamily counterparts.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p> Despite similar efforts in the digitalization process, family firms lag behind in the adoption of IT-enabled MCSs, which suggests that reduced agency issues in family firms constrain the MCS maturity level.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p> This study can assist practitioners in implementing a more mature MCS by considering the interplay between internal digitalization processes and family status of the firm, thereby enhancing the decision-making process.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p> This study adds novelty to an underexplored area at the intersection of MCSs, family firms and digitalization.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":18046,"journal":{"name":"Management Decision","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family firms, management control and digitalization effect\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Amato, Laura Broccardo, Andrea Tenucci\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/md-03-2023-0347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p> This study investigates the association between family firm status and the maturity level of management control systems (MCSs) by considering the moderating effect of process digitalization.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p> The authors conducted an empirical analysis on a sample of 106 Italian firms, utilizing both ordinary least squares and ordered logistic regression in this study.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>By resorting to the MCS maturity model proposed by Marx <em>et al.</em> (2012), the empirical findings reveal that family firms do not differ from their nonfamily counterparts regarding MCS maturity. Furthermore, the degree of process digitalization is positively associated with the probability of adopting IT-related technologies in MCSs. Digitalization negatively moderates the relationship between family firm status and MCS maturity, resulting in family firms exhibiting a lower MCS maturity level than their nonfamily counterparts.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p> Despite similar efforts in the digitalization process, family firms lag behind in the adoption of IT-enabled MCSs, which suggests that reduced agency issues in family firms constrain the MCS maturity level.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p> This study can assist practitioners in implementing a more mature MCS by considering the interplay between internal digitalization processes and family status of the firm, thereby enhancing the decision-making process.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p> This study adds novelty to an underexplored area at the intersection of MCSs, family firms and digitalization.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":18046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management Decision\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management Decision\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/md-03-2023-0347\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Decision","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/md-03-2023-0347","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过考虑流程数字化的调节作用,探讨了家族企业地位与管理控制系统(MCS)成熟度之间的关联。研究结果通过采用Marx等人(2012)提出的MCS成熟度模型,研究发现家族企业与非家族企业在MCS成熟度方面并无差异。此外,流程数字化程度与在监控管理系统中采用 IT 相关技术的概率呈正相关。数字化对家族企业地位与监控管理系统成熟度之间的关系起负调节作用,导致家族企业的监控管理系统成熟度低于非家族企业。 研究局限/启示 尽管家族企业在数字化进程中做出了类似的努力,但在采用信息技术支持的监控管理系统方面却落在了后面,这表明家族企业中代理问题的减少制约了监控管理系统的成熟度。实践意义 本研究通过考虑企业内部数字化进程与家族地位之间的相互作用,可以帮助从业人员实施更加成熟的管理监控系统,从而加强决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Family firms, management control and digitalization effect

Purpose

This study investigates the association between family firm status and the maturity level of management control systems (MCSs) by considering the moderating effect of process digitalization.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors conducted an empirical analysis on a sample of 106 Italian firms, utilizing both ordinary least squares and ordered logistic regression in this study.

Findings

By resorting to the MCS maturity model proposed by Marx et al. (2012), the empirical findings reveal that family firms do not differ from their nonfamily counterparts regarding MCS maturity. Furthermore, the degree of process digitalization is positively associated with the probability of adopting IT-related technologies in MCSs. Digitalization negatively moderates the relationship between family firm status and MCS maturity, resulting in family firms exhibiting a lower MCS maturity level than their nonfamily counterparts.

Research limitations/implications

Despite similar efforts in the digitalization process, family firms lag behind in the adoption of IT-enabled MCSs, which suggests that reduced agency issues in family firms constrain the MCS maturity level.

Practical implications

This study can assist practitioners in implementing a more mature MCS by considering the interplay between internal digitalization processes and family status of the firm, thereby enhancing the decision-making process.

Originality/value

This study adds novelty to an underexplored area at the intersection of MCSs, family firms and digitalization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: ■In-depth studies of major issues ■Operations management ■Financial management ■Motivation ■Entrepreneurship ■Problem solving and proactivity ■Serious management argument ■Strategy and policy issues ■Tactics for turning around company crises Management Decision, considered by many to be the best publication in its field, consistently offers thoughtful and provocative insights into current management practice. As such, its high calibre contributions from leading management philosophers and practitioners make it an invaluable resource in the aggressive and demanding trading climate of the Twenty-First Century.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信