使用图数据结构进行高层验证的三管齐下验证方法

IF 2.3 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Systems Pub Date : 2024-01-14 DOI:10.3390/systems12010027
Daniel Dunbar, Thomas Hagedorn, Mark Blackburn, Dinesh Verma
{"title":"使用图数据结构进行高层验证的三管齐下验证方法","authors":"Daniel Dunbar, Thomas Hagedorn, Mark Blackburn, Dinesh Verma","doi":"10.3390/systems12010027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Individual model verification is a common practice that increases the quality of design on the left side of the Vee model, often before costly builds and prototypes are implemented. However, verification that spans multiple models at higher levels of abstraction (e.g., subsystem, system, mission) is a complicated endeavor due to the federated nature of the data. This paper presents a tool-agnostic approach to higher-level verification tasks that incorporates tools from Semantic Web Technologies (SWTs) and graph theory more generally to enable a three-pronged verification approach to connected data. The methods presented herein use existing SWTs to characterize a verification approach using ontology-aligned data from both an open-world and closed-world perspective. General graph-based algorithms are then introduced to further explore structural aspects of portions of the graph. This verification approach enables a robust model-based verification on the left side of the Vee model to reduce risk and increase the visibility of the design and analysis work being performed by multidisciplinary teams.","PeriodicalId":36394,"journal":{"name":"Systems","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Three-Pronged Verification Approach to Higher-Level Verification Using Graph Data Structures\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Dunbar, Thomas Hagedorn, Mark Blackburn, Dinesh Verma\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/systems12010027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Individual model verification is a common practice that increases the quality of design on the left side of the Vee model, often before costly builds and prototypes are implemented. However, verification that spans multiple models at higher levels of abstraction (e.g., subsystem, system, mission) is a complicated endeavor due to the federated nature of the data. This paper presents a tool-agnostic approach to higher-level verification tasks that incorporates tools from Semantic Web Technologies (SWTs) and graph theory more generally to enable a three-pronged verification approach to connected data. The methods presented herein use existing SWTs to characterize a verification approach using ontology-aligned data from both an open-world and closed-world perspective. General graph-based algorithms are then introduced to further explore structural aspects of portions of the graph. This verification approach enables a robust model-based verification on the left side of the Vee model to reduce risk and increase the visibility of the design and analysis work being performed by multidisciplinary teams.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systems\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12010027\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systems","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12010027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

单个模型验证是提高 Vee 模型左侧设计质量的常用方法,通常在昂贵的构建和原型实施之前进行。然而,由于数据的联合性质,在更高抽象层次(如子系统、系统、任务)上跨越多个模型的验证是一项复杂的工作。本文针对更高层次的验证任务提出了一种与工具无关的方法,该方法结合了语义网技术(SWT)和更广泛的图论工具,从而实现了一种针对连接数据的三管齐下的验证方法。本文介绍的方法使用现有的 SWT,从开放世界和封闭世界的角度来描述使用本体对齐数据的验证方法。然后引入基于图的通用算法,进一步探索图的部分结构方面。这种验证方法能够在 Vee 模型的左侧进行基于模型的稳健验证,从而降低风险并提高多学科团队正在进行的设计和分析工作的可见性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Three-Pronged Verification Approach to Higher-Level Verification Using Graph Data Structures
Individual model verification is a common practice that increases the quality of design on the left side of the Vee model, often before costly builds and prototypes are implemented. However, verification that spans multiple models at higher levels of abstraction (e.g., subsystem, system, mission) is a complicated endeavor due to the federated nature of the data. This paper presents a tool-agnostic approach to higher-level verification tasks that incorporates tools from Semantic Web Technologies (SWTs) and graph theory more generally to enable a three-pronged verification approach to connected data. The methods presented herein use existing SWTs to characterize a verification approach using ontology-aligned data from both an open-world and closed-world perspective. General graph-based algorithms are then introduced to further explore structural aspects of portions of the graph. This verification approach enables a robust model-based verification on the left side of the Vee model to reduce risk and increase the visibility of the design and analysis work being performed by multidisciplinary teams.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Systems
Systems Decision Sciences-Information Systems and Management
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信