利用框架理论化社会纽带概念

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Omar Lizardo
{"title":"利用框架理论化社会纽带概念","authors":"Omar Lizardo","doi":"10.1016/j.socnet.2024.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In classical Social Network Analysis (SNA), what counted as a “social tie” was fixed by available data collection methods. The emergence of large-scale unobtrusive data collection techniques has sparked renewed interest in the very idea of what counts as a “social tie.” Importantly, there has been an acknowledgment that the core issues raised by these developments are primarily conceptual. As a result, there is renewed interest in developing a scientifically grounded characterization of what is arguably the most central concept in social network analysis. This paper contributes to this conceptual effort. I rely on a technique of conceptual representation borrowed from cognitive psychology and cognitive linguistics in which frames for concepts are represented as directed graphs linking attributes to values. I show how the frame representation helps clarify the sort of claims that network theories make (e.g., imposing restrictions on attributes and values), how it helps specify both intra and inter-conceptual relations, how it illuminates seldom noted inter-theoretical commonalities and contrasts, and how it helps avoid common conceptual pitfalls.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48353,"journal":{"name":"Social Networks","volume":"78 ","pages":"Pages 138-149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873324000017/pdfft?md5=fdd286078828e8dc2af3262d4518b679&pid=1-s2.0-S0378873324000017-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theorizing the concept of social tie using frames\",\"authors\":\"Omar Lizardo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socnet.2024.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In classical Social Network Analysis (SNA), what counted as a “social tie” was fixed by available data collection methods. The emergence of large-scale unobtrusive data collection techniques has sparked renewed interest in the very idea of what counts as a “social tie.” Importantly, there has been an acknowledgment that the core issues raised by these developments are primarily conceptual. As a result, there is renewed interest in developing a scientifically grounded characterization of what is arguably the most central concept in social network analysis. This paper contributes to this conceptual effort. I rely on a technique of conceptual representation borrowed from cognitive psychology and cognitive linguistics in which frames for concepts are represented as directed graphs linking attributes to values. I show how the frame representation helps clarify the sort of claims that network theories make (e.g., imposing restrictions on attributes and values), how it helps specify both intra and inter-conceptual relations, how it illuminates seldom noted inter-theoretical commonalities and contrasts, and how it helps avoid common conceptual pitfalls.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Networks\",\"volume\":\"78 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 138-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873324000017/pdfft?md5=fdd286078828e8dc2af3262d4518b679&pid=1-s2.0-S0378873324000017-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873324000017\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873324000017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在传统的社会网络分析(SNA)中,"社会联系 "的定义是由现有的数据收集方法决定的。大规模非侵入式数据收集技术的出现重新激发了人们对 "社会联系 "这一概念的兴趣。重要的是,人们已经认识到,这些发展所提出的核心问题主要是概念性的。因此,人们重新开始关注如何对社会网络分析中最核心的概念进行有科学依据的描述。本文为这一概念性工作做出了贡献。我借鉴了认知心理学和认知语言学的概念表征技术,将概念的框架表征为连接属性和价值的有向图。我展示了框架表示法如何帮助澄清网络理论的主张(例如,对属性和价值施加限制),如何帮助明确概念内部和概念之间的关系,如何揭示很少被注意到的理论之间的共性和对比,以及如何帮助避免常见的概念陷阱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theorizing the concept of social tie using frames

In classical Social Network Analysis (SNA), what counted as a “social tie” was fixed by available data collection methods. The emergence of large-scale unobtrusive data collection techniques has sparked renewed interest in the very idea of what counts as a “social tie.” Importantly, there has been an acknowledgment that the core issues raised by these developments are primarily conceptual. As a result, there is renewed interest in developing a scientifically grounded characterization of what is arguably the most central concept in social network analysis. This paper contributes to this conceptual effort. I rely on a technique of conceptual representation borrowed from cognitive psychology and cognitive linguistics in which frames for concepts are represented as directed graphs linking attributes to values. I show how the frame representation helps clarify the sort of claims that network theories make (e.g., imposing restrictions on attributes and values), how it helps specify both intra and inter-conceptual relations, how it illuminates seldom noted inter-theoretical commonalities and contrasts, and how it helps avoid common conceptual pitfalls.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Networks
Social Networks Multiple-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Social Networks is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly. It provides a common forum for representatives of anthropology, sociology, history, social psychology, political science, human geography, biology, economics, communications science and other disciplines who share an interest in the study of the empirical structure of social relations and associations that may be expressed in network form. It publishes both theoretical and substantive papers. Critical reviews of major theoretical or methodological approaches using the notion of networks in the analysis of social behaviour are also included, as are reviews of recent books dealing with social networks and social structure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信