2005-2014 年罗德岛的邻里风险和产前护理利用率。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Helena Habtemariam MPH, Lauren E. Schlichting PhD, Martha B. Kole-White MD, Blythe Berger ScD, Patrick Vivier MD
{"title":"2005-2014 年罗德岛的邻里风险和产前护理利用率。","authors":"Helena Habtemariam MPH,&nbsp;Lauren E. Schlichting PhD,&nbsp;Martha B. Kole-White MD,&nbsp;Blythe Berger ScD,&nbsp;Patrick Vivier MD","doi":"10.1111/birt.12810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The importance of prenatal care is undeniable, as pregnant persons who receive on-time, adequate prenatal care have better maternal and infant health outcomes compared with those receiving late, less than adequate prenatal care. Previous studies assessing the relationship between neighborhood factors and maternal health outcomes have typically looked at singular neighborhood variables and their relationship with maternal health outcomes. In order to examine a greater number of place-based risk factors simultaneously, our analysis used a unique neighborhood risk index to assess the association between cumulative risk and prenatal care utilization, which no other studies have done.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data from Rhode Island Vital Statistics for births between 2005 and 2014 were used to assess the relationship between neighborhood risk and prenatal care utilization using two established indices. We assessed neighborhood risk with an index composed of eight socioeconomic block-group variables. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to examine the association between adequate use and neighborhood risk.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals living in a high-risk neighborhood were less likely to have adequate or better prenatal care utilization according to both the APNCU Index (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87–0.95) and the R-GINDEX (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.85–0.91) compared with those in low-risk neighborhoods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Understanding the impact of neighborhood-level factors on prenatal care use is a critical first step in ensuring that underserved neighborhoods are prioritized in interventions aimed at making access to prenatal care more equitable.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 3","pages":"559-570"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neighborhood risk and prenatal care utilization in Rhode Island, 2005–2014\",\"authors\":\"Helena Habtemariam MPH,&nbsp;Lauren E. Schlichting PhD,&nbsp;Martha B. Kole-White MD,&nbsp;Blythe Berger ScD,&nbsp;Patrick Vivier MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/birt.12810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The importance of prenatal care is undeniable, as pregnant persons who receive on-time, adequate prenatal care have better maternal and infant health outcomes compared with those receiving late, less than adequate prenatal care. Previous studies assessing the relationship between neighborhood factors and maternal health outcomes have typically looked at singular neighborhood variables and their relationship with maternal health outcomes. In order to examine a greater number of place-based risk factors simultaneously, our analysis used a unique neighborhood risk index to assess the association between cumulative risk and prenatal care utilization, which no other studies have done.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data from Rhode Island Vital Statistics for births between 2005 and 2014 were used to assess the relationship between neighborhood risk and prenatal care utilization using two established indices. We assessed neighborhood risk with an index composed of eight socioeconomic block-group variables. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to examine the association between adequate use and neighborhood risk.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Individuals living in a high-risk neighborhood were less likely to have adequate or better prenatal care utilization according to both the APNCU Index (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87–0.95) and the R-GINDEX (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.85–0.91) compared with those in low-risk neighborhoods.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Understanding the impact of neighborhood-level factors on prenatal care use is a critical first step in ensuring that underserved neighborhoods are prioritized in interventions aimed at making access to prenatal care more equitable.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care\",\"volume\":\"51 3\",\"pages\":\"559-570\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/birt.12810\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/birt.12810","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:产前保健的重要性是毋庸置疑的,因为按时、充分接受产前保健的孕妇与过晚、接受产前保健不足的孕妇相比,母婴健康状况更好。以往评估邻里因素与孕产妇健康结果之间关系的研究通常只关注单一的邻里变量及其与孕产妇健康结果之间的关系。为了同时研究更多基于地方的风险因素,我们的分析使用了一个独特的邻里风险指数来评估累积风险与产前保健利用率之间的关系,这是其他研究没有做过的:方法: 我们使用罗德岛生命统计中 2005 年至 2014 年间的出生数据,通过两个既定指数来评估邻里风险与产前护理利用率之间的关系。我们使用由八个社会经济群体变量组成的指数来评估邻里风险。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型来研究充分使用与邻里风险之间的关系:根据 APNCU 指数(调整赔率比 [aOR]0.91,95% 置信区间 [CI]0.87-0.95)和 R-GINDEX 指数(aOR 0.88,95% 置信区间 0.85-0.91),生活在高风险社区的人与生活在低风险社区的人相比,不太可能充分或更好地利用产前护理:了解邻里因素对产前保健使用的影响是关键的第一步,可确保在干预措施中优先考虑服务不足的邻里,从而使产前保健的使用更加公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Neighborhood risk and prenatal care utilization in Rhode Island, 2005–2014

Neighborhood risk and prenatal care utilization in Rhode Island, 2005–2014

Background

The importance of prenatal care is undeniable, as pregnant persons who receive on-time, adequate prenatal care have better maternal and infant health outcomes compared with those receiving late, less than adequate prenatal care. Previous studies assessing the relationship between neighborhood factors and maternal health outcomes have typically looked at singular neighborhood variables and their relationship with maternal health outcomes. In order to examine a greater number of place-based risk factors simultaneously, our analysis used a unique neighborhood risk index to assess the association between cumulative risk and prenatal care utilization, which no other studies have done.

Methods

Data from Rhode Island Vital Statistics for births between 2005 and 2014 were used to assess the relationship between neighborhood risk and prenatal care utilization using two established indices. We assessed neighborhood risk with an index composed of eight socioeconomic block-group variables. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to examine the association between adequate use and neighborhood risk.

Results

Individuals living in a high-risk neighborhood were less likely to have adequate or better prenatal care utilization according to both the APNCU Index (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87–0.95) and the R-GINDEX (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.85–0.91) compared with those in low-risk neighborhoods.

Conclusion

Understanding the impact of neighborhood-level factors on prenatal care use is a critical first step in ensuring that underserved neighborhoods are prioritized in interventions aimed at making access to prenatal care more equitable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care is a multidisciplinary, refereed journal devoted to issues and practices in the care of childbearing women, infants, and families. It is written by and for professionals in maternal and neonatal health, nurses, midwives, physicians, public health workers, doulas, social scientists, childbirth educators, lactation counselors, epidemiologists, and other health caregivers and policymakers in perinatal care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信