物理治疗师和职业治疗师在跨部门协调轻度中风患者康复方面的经验--定性访谈研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2302560
Stina Meyer Larsen, Kirstine Bille-Hangaard, Sverker Johansson, Charlotte Ytterberg, Lisbeth Rosenbek Minet
{"title":"物理治疗师和职业治疗师在跨部门协调轻度中风患者康复方面的经验--定性访谈研究。","authors":"Stina Meyer Larsen, Kirstine Bille-Hangaard, Sverker Johansson, Charlotte Ytterberg, Lisbeth Rosenbek Minet","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2302560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To meet the needs of people with mild stroke, multidisciplinary, person-centred, cross-sectoral rehabilitation is internationally recommended. However, there seem to be gaps in the rehabilitation process. The aim of this study was to investigate how occupational therapists and physiotherapists experience working in cross-sectoral rehabilitation for people with mild stroke.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were generated through interviews with occupational therapists and physiotherapists working in four different Danish rehabilitation settings. Four group interviews and two individual interviews with a total of 19 participants were conducted. Ricoeur's theory of interpretation was used to interpret and discuss the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were identified: the risk of overlooking symptoms: better safe than sorry; varying degrees of involvement of people with mild stroke; spontaneous involvement of relatives; and contextual challenges for coherence in the rehabilitation process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The therapists experienced challenges in coordinating rehabilitation across sectors due to the timing of the needs assessment and contextual challenges. They used a preventive strategy of sending a plan or referral for later re-assessment. The therapists involved people with mild stroke to varying degrees. They involved relatives spontaneously. For successful rehabilitation, ongoing assessment, recognition of collaboration factors and relative involvement are essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"5227-5234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physiotherapists' and occupational therapists' experiences with cross-sectoral coordination of rehabilitation for people with mild stroke - a qualitative interview study.\",\"authors\":\"Stina Meyer Larsen, Kirstine Bille-Hangaard, Sverker Johansson, Charlotte Ytterberg, Lisbeth Rosenbek Minet\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638288.2024.2302560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To meet the needs of people with mild stroke, multidisciplinary, person-centred, cross-sectoral rehabilitation is internationally recommended. However, there seem to be gaps in the rehabilitation process. The aim of this study was to investigate how occupational therapists and physiotherapists experience working in cross-sectoral rehabilitation for people with mild stroke.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were generated through interviews with occupational therapists and physiotherapists working in four different Danish rehabilitation settings. Four group interviews and two individual interviews with a total of 19 participants were conducted. Ricoeur's theory of interpretation was used to interpret and discuss the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were identified: the risk of overlooking symptoms: better safe than sorry; varying degrees of involvement of people with mild stroke; spontaneous involvement of relatives; and contextual challenges for coherence in the rehabilitation process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The therapists experienced challenges in coordinating rehabilitation across sectors due to the timing of the needs assessment and contextual challenges. They used a preventive strategy of sending a plan or referral for later re-assessment. The therapists involved people with mild stroke to varying degrees. They involved relatives spontaneously. For successful rehabilitation, ongoing assessment, recognition of collaboration factors and relative involvement are essential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5227-5234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2302560\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2302560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为满足轻度脑卒中患者的需求,国际上建议开展多学科、以人为本的跨部门康复。然而,在康复过程中似乎存在差距。本研究旨在调查职业治疗师和物理治疗师在为轻度脑卒中患者提供跨部门康复服务时的工作经验:通过对在丹麦四个不同康复机构工作的职业治疗师和物理治疗师进行访谈获得数据。共进行了四次小组访谈和两次个人访谈,共有 19 人参加。研究采用了呂科爾的詮釋理論來詮釋和討論資料:结果:确定了四个主题:忽视症状的风险:安全总比遗憾好;轻度中风患者不同程度的参与;亲属的自发参与;康复过程中一致性的背景挑战:结论:由于需求评估的时间安排和环境挑战,治疗师在协调跨部门康复方面遇到了挑战。他们采用了一种预防性策略,即发送计划或转介,以便日后重新评估。治疗师在不同程度上让轻度中风患者参与进来。他们让亲属自发地参与进来。对于成功的康复来说,持续的评估、对合作因素的认识以及亲属的参与是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physiotherapists' and occupational therapists' experiences with cross-sectoral coordination of rehabilitation for people with mild stroke - a qualitative interview study.

Purpose: To meet the needs of people with mild stroke, multidisciplinary, person-centred, cross-sectoral rehabilitation is internationally recommended. However, there seem to be gaps in the rehabilitation process. The aim of this study was to investigate how occupational therapists and physiotherapists experience working in cross-sectoral rehabilitation for people with mild stroke.

Materials and methods: Data were generated through interviews with occupational therapists and physiotherapists working in four different Danish rehabilitation settings. Four group interviews and two individual interviews with a total of 19 participants were conducted. Ricoeur's theory of interpretation was used to interpret and discuss the data.

Results: Four themes were identified: the risk of overlooking symptoms: better safe than sorry; varying degrees of involvement of people with mild stroke; spontaneous involvement of relatives; and contextual challenges for coherence in the rehabilitation process.

Conclusion: The therapists experienced challenges in coordinating rehabilitation across sectors due to the timing of the needs assessment and contextual challenges. They used a preventive strategy of sending a plan or referral for later re-assessment. The therapists involved people with mild stroke to varying degrees. They involved relatives spontaneously. For successful rehabilitation, ongoing assessment, recognition of collaboration factors and relative involvement are essential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信