全球青光眼筛查指南。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Glaucoma Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002362
Robert Gunzenhauser, Anne L Coleman
{"title":"全球青光眼筛查指南。","authors":"Robert Gunzenhauser, Anne L Coleman","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>Recommendations for glaucoma screening vary significantly from organization to organization, and while worldwide screening is currently not recommended, there is support in many organizations for screening at-risk subgroups of the general population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarize and compare current glaucoma screening protocols of major national and international, governmental, and non-governmental organizations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A general review of the major medical, and more specifically ophthalmic, organizations within North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa was undertaken. Protocols from recent international and regional meetings were reviewed and summarized and a comparative analysis was employed to highlight differences between national and regional policies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In general, it was found that worldwide screening for glaucoma is currently of limited clinical utility and unlikely to be cost-effective. However, a more targeted approach is recommended by some major organizations, including the American Academy of Ophthalmology, the Pan-American Association of Ophthalmology, and the International Council of Ophthalmology in conjunction with a group of prominent ophthalmologists based in Sub-Saharan Africa recommend a targeted approach to screening specific populations that are deemed to be at higher risk of developing glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>General population screening for glaucoma has been adopted as a recommendation by only a few organizations and only in specific situations. It is the screening of high-risk populations that has been demonstrated to be not only clinically useful in diagnosing and treating larger proportions of the general population benefiting from a higher positive-predictive value for screening protocols in these groups but also cost-effective. Further research is needed to create cost-effective protocols to successfully screen these high-risk populations for glaucoma using methods that are sufficiently sensitive and specific.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glaucoma Screening Guidelines Worldwide.\",\"authors\":\"Robert Gunzenhauser, Anne L Coleman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>Recommendations for glaucoma screening vary significantly from organization to organization, and while worldwide screening is currently not recommended, there is support in many organizations for screening at-risk subgroups of the general population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarize and compare current glaucoma screening protocols of major national and international, governmental, and non-governmental organizations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A general review of the major medical, and more specifically ophthalmic, organizations within North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa was undertaken. Protocols from recent international and regional meetings were reviewed and summarized and a comparative analysis was employed to highlight differences between national and regional policies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In general, it was found that worldwide screening for glaucoma is currently of limited clinical utility and unlikely to be cost-effective. However, a more targeted approach is recommended by some major organizations, including the American Academy of Ophthalmology, the Pan-American Association of Ophthalmology, and the International Council of Ophthalmology in conjunction with a group of prominent ophthalmologists based in Sub-Saharan Africa recommend a targeted approach to screening specific populations that are deemed to be at higher risk of developing glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>General population screening for glaucoma has been adopted as a recommendation by only a few organizations and only in specific situations. It is the screening of high-risk populations that has been demonstrated to be not only clinically useful in diagnosing and treating larger proportions of the general population benefiting from a higher positive-predictive value for screening protocols in these groups but also cost-effective. Further research is needed to create cost-effective protocols to successfully screen these high-risk populations for glaucoma using methods that are sufficiently sensitive and specific.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Glaucoma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332374/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Glaucoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002362\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002362","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

普查:目的:总结并比较目前主要国家和国际组织、政府组织和非政府组织的青光眼筛查方案:方法/结果:对北美、南美、欧洲、亚洲和非洲的主要医疗组织,更具体地说是眼科组织进行了总体回顾。对最近召开的国际和地区会议的议定书进行了审查和总结,并采用比较分析的方法来突出国家和地区政策之间的差异。总体而言,研究发现目前在全球范围内进行青光眼筛查的临床实用性有限,而且不太可能具有成本效益。然而,一些主要组织,包括美国眼科学会、泛美眼科学会和国际眼科学理事会,以及撒哈拉以南非洲的一些著名眼科专家建议采取更有针对性的方法,对被认为患青光眼风险较高的特定人群进行筛查:结论:只有少数几个组织在特定情况下才建议对普通人群进行青光眼筛查。事实证明,对高危人群进行筛查不仅在临床上有助于诊断和治疗更大比例的普通人群,因为这些人群的筛查方案具有更高的阳性预测值,而且还具有成本效益。需要进一步开展研究,以制定具有成本效益的方案,使用足够灵敏和特异的方法成功筛查这些高危人群是否患有青光眼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Glaucoma Screening Guidelines Worldwide.

Prcis: Recommendations for glaucoma screening vary significantly from organization to organization, and while worldwide screening is currently not recommended, there is support in many organizations for screening at-risk subgroups of the general population.

Objective: To summarize and compare current glaucoma screening protocols of major national and international, governmental, and non-governmental organizations.

Methods: A general review of the major medical, and more specifically ophthalmic, organizations within North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa was undertaken. Protocols from recent international and regional meetings were reviewed and summarized and a comparative analysis was employed to highlight differences between national and regional policies.

Results: In general, it was found that worldwide screening for glaucoma is currently of limited clinical utility and unlikely to be cost-effective. However, a more targeted approach is recommended by some major organizations, including the American Academy of Ophthalmology, the Pan-American Association of Ophthalmology, and the International Council of Ophthalmology in conjunction with a group of prominent ophthalmologists based in Sub-Saharan Africa recommend a targeted approach to screening specific populations that are deemed to be at higher risk of developing glaucoma.

Conclusion: General population screening for glaucoma has been adopted as a recommendation by only a few organizations and only in specific situations. It is the screening of high-risk populations that has been demonstrated to be not only clinically useful in diagnosing and treating larger proportions of the general population benefiting from a higher positive-predictive value for screening protocols in these groups but also cost-effective. Further research is needed to create cost-effective protocols to successfully screen these high-risk populations for glaucoma using methods that are sufficiently sensitive and specific.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信