儿科中扑热息痛的含碳量以及与不同给药途径相关的消耗品。

Nicola Wilson , Caroline Dalton
{"title":"儿科中扑热息痛的含碳量以及与不同给药途径相关的消耗品。","authors":"Nicola Wilson ,&nbsp;Caroline Dalton","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2024.100298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The aim of this study was to estimate the embodied carbon of different formulations of paracetamol, its packaging and the consumables used in administration within pediatrics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A set dose of 750 mg was chosen to represent complex dosing seen in pediatrics and then two separate approaches to measuring the embodied carbon were taken. A top-down environmentally extended input-output analysis for the drug and a bottom-up approach using the emissions factors for the primary material was used for the packaging and consumables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All oral methods of administration have the lowest embodied carbon when accounting for the drugs, consumables, and packaging.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study demonstrates how working across disciplines we can look for ways in which we can minimize the carbon cost of care. This study finds that when accounting for patient safety, acceptability within pediatrics and the embodied carbon, all non-IV methods are preferable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278224000014/pdfft?md5=d8987a505f9bdbbaab39e2395c8780a0&pid=1-s2.0-S2667278224000014-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The embodied carbon of paracetamol and the consumables associated with different routes of administration in pediatrics\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Wilson ,&nbsp;Caroline Dalton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joclim.2024.100298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The aim of this study was to estimate the embodied carbon of different formulations of paracetamol, its packaging and the consumables used in administration within pediatrics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A set dose of 750 mg was chosen to represent complex dosing seen in pediatrics and then two separate approaches to measuring the embodied carbon were taken. A top-down environmentally extended input-output analysis for the drug and a bottom-up approach using the emissions factors for the primary material was used for the packaging and consumables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All oral methods of administration have the lowest embodied carbon when accounting for the drugs, consumables, and packaging.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study demonstrates how working across disciplines we can look for ways in which we can minimize the carbon cost of care. This study finds that when accounting for patient safety, acceptability within pediatrics and the embodied carbon, all non-IV methods are preferable.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of climate change and health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278224000014/pdfft?md5=d8987a505f9bdbbaab39e2395c8780a0&pid=1-s2.0-S2667278224000014-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of climate change and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278224000014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of climate change and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278224000014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 本研究的目的是估算扑热息痛不同配方、包装和儿科用药耗材的内含碳量。方法 选择 750 毫克的设定剂量来代表儿科常见的复杂剂量,然后采用两种不同的方法来测量内含碳量。结果当考虑到药物、耗材和包装时,所有口服给药方法的含碳量都是最低的。本研究发现,如果考虑到患者安全、儿科的可接受性以及碳排放量,所有非静脉注射方法都更可取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The embodied carbon of paracetamol and the consumables associated with different routes of administration in pediatrics

Background

The aim of this study was to estimate the embodied carbon of different formulations of paracetamol, its packaging and the consumables used in administration within pediatrics.

Methods

A set dose of 750 mg was chosen to represent complex dosing seen in pediatrics and then two separate approaches to measuring the embodied carbon were taken. A top-down environmentally extended input-output analysis for the drug and a bottom-up approach using the emissions factors for the primary material was used for the packaging and consumables.

Results

All oral methods of administration have the lowest embodied carbon when accounting for the drugs, consumables, and packaging.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates how working across disciplines we can look for ways in which we can minimize the carbon cost of care. This study finds that when accounting for patient safety, acceptability within pediatrics and the embodied carbon, all non-IV methods are preferable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The journal of climate change and health
The journal of climate change and health Global and Planetary Change, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信