布路里溃疡病愈合的临床和微生物学预测因素

IF 1.9 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Bernadette Agbavor , Abigail Agbanyo , Aloysius Dzigbordi Loglo , Philemon Boasiako Antwi , Nancy Ackam , Jonathan Adjei , Venus Frimpong , Kwadwo Boampong , Michael Frimpong , Matthew Glover Addo , Mark Wansbrough-Jones , Yaw Ampem Amoako , Richard Odame Phillips
{"title":"布路里溃疡病愈合的临床和微生物学预测因素","authors":"Bernadette Agbavor ,&nbsp;Abigail Agbanyo ,&nbsp;Aloysius Dzigbordi Loglo ,&nbsp;Philemon Boasiako Antwi ,&nbsp;Nancy Ackam ,&nbsp;Jonathan Adjei ,&nbsp;Venus Frimpong ,&nbsp;Kwadwo Boampong ,&nbsp;Michael Frimpong ,&nbsp;Matthew Glover Addo ,&nbsp;Mark Wansbrough-Jones ,&nbsp;Yaw Ampem Amoako ,&nbsp;Richard Odame Phillips","doi":"10.1016/j.jctube.2024.100415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Wound measurements are relevant in monitoring the rate of healing (RoH) and may predict time to healing. Predicting the time to healing can help improve the management of Buruli ulcer. We examine three methods for the determination of RoH and their use as predictors of time to healing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Lesion measurements of Buruli ulcer patients treated from 2007 to 2022 were obtained with acetate sheet tracings (2D) or Aranz software (3D) fortnightly. RoH was determined using the absolute area, percentage area reduction and linear methods at 4 weeks post onset of antibiotic treatment. Predicted time to healing was compared to the actual healing time. Baseline characteristics were assessed for associations with healing.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All three methods for calculating the RoH significantly distinguished between fast and slow healers (p &lt; 0.0001). The predicted healing time using the linear method was comparable to the actual healing time for fast healers (p = 0.34). The RoH was influenced by the form of lesion, with plaques [OR 2.19 5 %CI (1.2–3.6), p = 0.009], and oedemas [OR 8.5; 95 %CI (1.9––36.9), p = 0.004] being associated with delayed healing. The proportion of patients with paradoxical reactions 16 % vs 3 %, p &lt; 0.0001), higher baseline bacterial load (75/104;72 % vs 21/47;45 %, p = 0.001) and delayed clearance of viable organisms (71/104;68 % vs 9/47;19 %, p &lt; 0.0001) was higher in the slow healers than the fast healers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Predicted healing rates were comparatively lower for slow healers than fast healers. Baseline characteristics associated with healing can be explored for an improved disease management plan to reduce patient and caregiver anxiety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100415"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405579424000020/pdfft?md5=00040d2c702677cf27c2597927813f9c&pid=1-s2.0-S2405579424000020-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and microbiological predictors of healing in Buruli ulcer disease\",\"authors\":\"Bernadette Agbavor ,&nbsp;Abigail Agbanyo ,&nbsp;Aloysius Dzigbordi Loglo ,&nbsp;Philemon Boasiako Antwi ,&nbsp;Nancy Ackam ,&nbsp;Jonathan Adjei ,&nbsp;Venus Frimpong ,&nbsp;Kwadwo Boampong ,&nbsp;Michael Frimpong ,&nbsp;Matthew Glover Addo ,&nbsp;Mark Wansbrough-Jones ,&nbsp;Yaw Ampem Amoako ,&nbsp;Richard Odame Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jctube.2024.100415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Wound measurements are relevant in monitoring the rate of healing (RoH) and may predict time to healing. Predicting the time to healing can help improve the management of Buruli ulcer. We examine three methods for the determination of RoH and their use as predictors of time to healing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Lesion measurements of Buruli ulcer patients treated from 2007 to 2022 were obtained with acetate sheet tracings (2D) or Aranz software (3D) fortnightly. RoH was determined using the absolute area, percentage area reduction and linear methods at 4 weeks post onset of antibiotic treatment. Predicted time to healing was compared to the actual healing time. Baseline characteristics were assessed for associations with healing.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All three methods for calculating the RoH significantly distinguished between fast and slow healers (p &lt; 0.0001). The predicted healing time using the linear method was comparable to the actual healing time for fast healers (p = 0.34). The RoH was influenced by the form of lesion, with plaques [OR 2.19 5 %CI (1.2–3.6), p = 0.009], and oedemas [OR 8.5; 95 %CI (1.9––36.9), p = 0.004] being associated with delayed healing. The proportion of patients with paradoxical reactions 16 % vs 3 %, p &lt; 0.0001), higher baseline bacterial load (75/104;72 % vs 21/47;45 %, p = 0.001) and delayed clearance of viable organisms (71/104;68 % vs 9/47;19 %, p &lt; 0.0001) was higher in the slow healers than the fast healers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Predicted healing rates were comparatively lower for slow healers than fast healers. Baseline characteristics associated with healing can be explored for an improved disease management plan to reduce patient and caregiver anxiety.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405579424000020/pdfft?md5=00040d2c702677cf27c2597927813f9c&pid=1-s2.0-S2405579424000020-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405579424000020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405579424000020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言伤口测量有助于监测愈合率(RoH),并可预测愈合时间。预测愈合时间有助于改善布路里溃疡的治疗。我们研究了测定RoH的三种方法,并将其用作愈合时间的预测指标。方法每两周用醋酸纤维片描图(2D)或Aranz软件(3D)对2007年至2022年接受治疗的布路里溃疡患者的创面进行测量。在抗生素治疗开始后 4 周,采用绝对面积法、面积缩小百分比法和线性法测定 RoH。将预测愈合时间与实际愈合时间进行比较。结果 所有三种计算RoH的方法都能显著区分愈合快和愈合慢的患者(p <0.0001)。使用线性方法预测的痊愈时间与快速痊愈者的实际痊愈时间相当(p = 0.34)。RoH受病变形式的影响,斑块[OR 2.19 5 %CI (1.2-3.6),p = 0.009]和水肿[OR 8.5; 95 %CI (1.9-36.9),p = 0.004]与延迟愈合有关。慢速痊愈者比快速痊愈者有更高比例的矛盾反应(16 % vs 3 %,p <0.0001)、更高的基线细菌负荷(75/104;72 % vs 21/47;45%,p = 0.001)和存活微生物的延迟清除(71/104;68 % vs 9/47;19%,p <0.0001)。可以探索与痊愈相关的基线特征,以改进疾病管理计划,减轻患者和护理人员的焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical and microbiological predictors of healing in Buruli ulcer disease

Introduction

Wound measurements are relevant in monitoring the rate of healing (RoH) and may predict time to healing. Predicting the time to healing can help improve the management of Buruli ulcer. We examine three methods for the determination of RoH and their use as predictors of time to healing.

Methods

Lesion measurements of Buruli ulcer patients treated from 2007 to 2022 were obtained with acetate sheet tracings (2D) or Aranz software (3D) fortnightly. RoH was determined using the absolute area, percentage area reduction and linear methods at 4 weeks post onset of antibiotic treatment. Predicted time to healing was compared to the actual healing time. Baseline characteristics were assessed for associations with healing.

Results

All three methods for calculating the RoH significantly distinguished between fast and slow healers (p < 0.0001). The predicted healing time using the linear method was comparable to the actual healing time for fast healers (p = 0.34). The RoH was influenced by the form of lesion, with plaques [OR 2.19 5 %CI (1.2–3.6), p = 0.009], and oedemas [OR 8.5; 95 %CI (1.9––36.9), p = 0.004] being associated with delayed healing. The proportion of patients with paradoxical reactions 16 % vs 3 %, p < 0.0001), higher baseline bacterial load (75/104;72 % vs 21/47;45 %, p = 0.001) and delayed clearance of viable organisms (71/104;68 % vs 9/47;19 %, p < 0.0001) was higher in the slow healers than the fast healers.

Conclusion

Predicted healing rates were comparatively lower for slow healers than fast healers. Baseline characteristics associated with healing can be explored for an improved disease management plan to reduce patient and caregiver anxiety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases
Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Mycobacterial Diseases aims to provide a forum for clinically relevant articles on all aspects of tuberculosis and other mycobacterial infections, including (but not limited to) epidemiology, clinical investigation, transmission, diagnosis, treatment, drug-resistance and public policy, and encourages the submission of clinical studies, thematic reviews and case reports. Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Mycobacterial Diseases is an Open Access publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信