美国亲密伴侣暴力案件中的恢复性司法:元综合

Sarah Balser, Ashley Withrow, Liat R. Johnson, Caroline Duke Chaikin
{"title":"美国亲密伴侣暴力案件中的恢复性司法:元综合","authors":"Sarah Balser, Ashley Withrow, Liat R. Johnson, Caroline Duke Chaikin","doi":"10.1177/10443894231212546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Restorative justice (RJ) has been applied to intimate partner violence (IPV) cases, but some question whether RJ is appropriate for IPV. This review is the first to focus on qualitative research on how RJ is interpreted and used in IPV cases in the United States. Six articles met the inclusion criteria. Findings indicated that RJ is used with the criminal legal system (CLS), initiated by the victim, and is not community-oriented. Concerns for victims being harmed or retraumatized were not supported in RJ processes happening in relation to the CLS, with some providers highlighting the importance of facilitation training and techniques. Additional research is needed to explore RJ processes and their relationship to the CLS for IPV.","PeriodicalId":502665,"journal":{"name":"Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services","volume":"104 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restorative Justice in Cases of Intimate Partner Violence in the United States: A Metasynthesis\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Balser, Ashley Withrow, Liat R. Johnson, Caroline Duke Chaikin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10443894231212546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Restorative justice (RJ) has been applied to intimate partner violence (IPV) cases, but some question whether RJ is appropriate for IPV. This review is the first to focus on qualitative research on how RJ is interpreted and used in IPV cases in the United States. Six articles met the inclusion criteria. Findings indicated that RJ is used with the criminal legal system (CLS), initiated by the victim, and is not community-oriented. Concerns for victims being harmed or retraumatized were not supported in RJ processes happening in relation to the CLS, with some providers highlighting the importance of facilitation training and techniques. Additional research is needed to explore RJ processes and their relationship to the CLS for IPV.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services\",\"volume\":\"104 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10443894231212546\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10443894231212546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

恢复性司法 (RJ) 已被应用于亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 案件,但也有人质疑 RJ 是否适合 IPV。本综述首次关注美国如何解释和在 IPV 案件中使用 RJ 的定性研究。六篇文章符合纳入标准。研究结果表明,RJ 是与刑事法律系统(CLS)一起使用的,由受害者发起,并非以社区为导向。在与刑事法律系统相关的 RJ 过程中,对受害者受到伤害或再次受到创伤的担忧没有得到支持,一些提供者强调了促进培训和技巧的重要性。需要开展更多研究,以探讨 RJ 程序及其与针对 IPV 的 CLS 的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Restorative Justice in Cases of Intimate Partner Violence in the United States: A Metasynthesis
Restorative justice (RJ) has been applied to intimate partner violence (IPV) cases, but some question whether RJ is appropriate for IPV. This review is the first to focus on qualitative research on how RJ is interpreted and used in IPV cases in the United States. Six articles met the inclusion criteria. Findings indicated that RJ is used with the criminal legal system (CLS), initiated by the victim, and is not community-oriented. Concerns for victims being harmed or retraumatized were not supported in RJ processes happening in relation to the CLS, with some providers highlighting the importance of facilitation training and techniques. Additional research is needed to explore RJ processes and their relationship to the CLS for IPV.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信