识别恶性胸腔积液的简单高效临床预测评分系统。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Shuyan Wang, Jing An, Xueru Hu, Tingting Zeng, Ping Li, Jiangyue Qin, Yongchun Shen, Tao Wang, Fuqiang Wen
{"title":"识别恶性胸腔积液的简单高效临床预测评分系统。","authors":"Shuyan Wang, Jing An, Xueru Hu, Tingting Zeng, Ping Li, Jiangyue Qin, Yongchun Shen, Tao Wang, Fuqiang Wen","doi":"10.1177/17534666231223002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is of great significance. Current prediction models are not simple enough to be widely used in heavy clinical work.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to develop a simple and efficient clinical prediction scoring system to distinguish MPE from benign pleural effusion (BPE).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective study involved patients with MPE or BPE who were admitted in West China Hospital from December 2010 to September 2016.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were divided into training, testing, and validation set. Prediction model was developed from training set and modified to a scoring system. The diagnostic efficacy and clinical benefits of the scoring system were estimated in all three sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finally, 598 cases of MPE and 1094 cases of BPE were included. Serum neuron-specific enolase, serum cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1), pleural carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and ratio of pleural CEA to serum CEA were selected to establish the prediction models in training set, which were modified to the scoring system with scores of 6, 8, 10, and 9 points, respectively. Patients with scores >12 points have high MPE risk while ⩽12 points have low MPE risk. The scoring system has a high predictive value and good clinical benefits to differentiate MPE from BPE or lung-specific MPE from BPE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study developed a simple clinical prediction scoring system and was proven to have good clinical benefits, and it may help clinicians to separate MPE from BPE.</p>","PeriodicalId":22884,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10775726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A simple and efficient clinical prediction scoring system to identify malignant pleural effusion.\",\"authors\":\"Shuyan Wang, Jing An, Xueru Hu, Tingting Zeng, Ping Li, Jiangyue Qin, Yongchun Shen, Tao Wang, Fuqiang Wen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17534666231223002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is of great significance. Current prediction models are not simple enough to be widely used in heavy clinical work.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to develop a simple and efficient clinical prediction scoring system to distinguish MPE from benign pleural effusion (BPE).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective study involved patients with MPE or BPE who were admitted in West China Hospital from December 2010 to September 2016.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were divided into training, testing, and validation set. Prediction model was developed from training set and modified to a scoring system. The diagnostic efficacy and clinical benefits of the scoring system were estimated in all three sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finally, 598 cases of MPE and 1094 cases of BPE were included. Serum neuron-specific enolase, serum cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1), pleural carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and ratio of pleural CEA to serum CEA were selected to establish the prediction models in training set, which were modified to the scoring system with scores of 6, 8, 10, and 9 points, respectively. Patients with scores >12 points have high MPE risk while ⩽12 points have low MPE risk. The scoring system has a high predictive value and good clinical benefits to differentiate MPE from BPE or lung-specific MPE from BPE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study developed a simple clinical prediction scoring system and was proven to have good clinical benefits, and it may help clinicians to separate MPE from BPE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10775726/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17534666231223002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17534666231223002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:恶性胸腔积液(MPE)的早期诊断意义重大。目前的预测模型不够简单,无法广泛应用于繁重的临床工作:我们旨在开发一种简单高效的临床预测评分系统,以区分恶性胸腔积液(MPE)和良性胸腔积液(BPE):这项回顾性研究涉及2010年12月至2016年9月在华西医院住院的MPE或BPE患者:将患者分为训练集、测试集和验证集。根据训练集建立预测模型,并修改为评分系统。对三组评分系统的诊断效果和临床效益进行了评估:结果:最终纳入了 598 例 MPE 和 1094 例 BPE。选择血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶、血清细胞角蛋白 19 片段(CYFRA21-1)、胸膜癌胚抗原(CEA)、胸膜癌胚抗原与血清癌胚抗原的比值建立训练集预测模型,并将其修改为评分系统,评分分别为 6 分、8 分、10 分和 9 分。评分大于 12 分的患者具有高 MPE 风险,而评分小于 12 分的患者具有低 MPE 风险。该评分系统在区分 MPE 与 BPE 或肺特异性 MPE 与 BPE 方面具有较高的预测价值和良好的临床效益:本研究建立了一个简单的临床预测评分系统,并被证明具有良好的临床效益,可帮助临床医生区分 MPE 和 BPE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A simple and efficient clinical prediction scoring system to identify malignant pleural effusion.

Background: Early diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is of great significance. Current prediction models are not simple enough to be widely used in heavy clinical work.

Objectives: We aimed to develop a simple and efficient clinical prediction scoring system to distinguish MPE from benign pleural effusion (BPE).

Design: This retrospective study involved patients with MPE or BPE who were admitted in West China Hospital from December 2010 to September 2016.

Methods: Patients were divided into training, testing, and validation set. Prediction model was developed from training set and modified to a scoring system. The diagnostic efficacy and clinical benefits of the scoring system were estimated in all three sets.

Results: Finally, 598 cases of MPE and 1094 cases of BPE were included. Serum neuron-specific enolase, serum cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1), pleural carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and ratio of pleural CEA to serum CEA were selected to establish the prediction models in training set, which were modified to the scoring system with scores of 6, 8, 10, and 9 points, respectively. Patients with scores >12 points have high MPE risk while ⩽12 points have low MPE risk. The scoring system has a high predictive value and good clinical benefits to differentiate MPE from BPE or lung-specific MPE from BPE.

Conclusion: This study developed a simple clinical prediction scoring system and was proven to have good clinical benefits, and it may help clinicians to separate MPE from BPE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of respiratory disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信