Anna Bareis , Marion Spengler , Sven Rieger , Jessica R. Gladstone , Ji Seung Yang , Benjamin Nagengast , Ulrich Trautwein , Allan Wigfield
{"title":"用高中生和大学生中的相似结构来检验自觉性 × 利益补偿（CONIC）模型","authors":"Anna Bareis , Marion Spengler , Sven Rieger , Jessica R. Gladstone , Ji Seung Yang , Benjamin Nagengast , Ulrich Trautwein , Allan Wigfield","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Conscientiousness × Interest Compensation (CONIC) model (Trautwein et al., 2019) assumes that the two constructs conscientiousness and interest can (partly) compensate for each other in predicting academic effort and achievement. We extend previous work by testing the CONIC model in two independent U.S. samples from different age groups (high school sample: <em>N</em> = 1,246, <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 14.86 years; college sample: <em>N</em> = 581, <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 19.83 years). We also assessed whether the compensatory relations occur when grit is substituted for conscientiousness and students’ overall task value or utility value for interest. We preregistered the study and tested the various models for both science and math effort as well as achievement, using latent variable regression analyses. Overall, we found some support for the CONIC model in the U.S. samples. There was also some support for the extensions of the model to the other constructs; however, the predictive links were not as strong.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Personality","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 104462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000102/pdfft?md5=4e8d76d2d2c067e5e7b97830361fcf83&pid=1-s2.0-S0092656624000102-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Conscientiousness × Interest Compensation (CONIC) model with similar constructs in high school and college students\",\"authors\":\"Anna Bareis , Marion Spengler , Sven Rieger , Jessica R. Gladstone , Ji Seung Yang , Benjamin Nagengast , Ulrich Trautwein , Allan Wigfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Conscientiousness × Interest Compensation (CONIC) model (Trautwein et al., 2019) assumes that the two constructs conscientiousness and interest can (partly) compensate for each other in predicting academic effort and achievement. We extend previous work by testing the CONIC model in two independent U.S. samples from different age groups (high school sample: <em>N</em> = 1,246, <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 14.86 years; college sample: <em>N</em> = 581, <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 19.83 years). We also assessed whether the compensatory relations occur when grit is substituted for conscientiousness and students’ overall task value or utility value for interest. We preregistered the study and tested the various models for both science and math effort as well as achievement, using latent variable regression analyses. Overall, we found some support for the CONIC model in the U.S. samples. There was also some support for the extensions of the model to the other constructs; however, the predictive links were not as strong.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Personality\",\"volume\":\"110 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000102/pdfft?md5=4e8d76d2d2c067e5e7b97830361fcf83&pid=1-s2.0-S0092656624000102-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Personality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000102\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000102","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
自觉性 × 兴趣补偿（CONIC）模型（作者，2019 年）假定，自觉性和兴趣这两个构念在（部分）预测学业努力和成绩时可以相互补偿。我们在两个不同年龄组的独立美国样本中（高中样本：N = 1,246, M. A., N = 1,246, M. A., N = 1,246, M. A., N = 1,246N = 1,246, Mage = 14.86 years; college sample：样本数 = 581，年龄 = 19.83 岁）。我们还评估了当用 "自觉性 "和 "学生的整体任务价值 "或 "兴趣的效用价值 "替代 "砾石性 "时，是否会出现补偿关系。我们对研究进行了预先登记，并使用潜变量回归分析对科学和数学努力以及成绩的各种模型进行了测试。总体而言，我们发现 CONIC 模型在美国样本中得到了一定的支持。此外，我们还发现该模型在其他方面的扩展也得到了一定的支持；但是，其预测性并不强。
Examining the Conscientiousness × Interest Compensation (CONIC) model with similar constructs in high school and college students
The Conscientiousness × Interest Compensation (CONIC) model (Trautwein et al., 2019) assumes that the two constructs conscientiousness and interest can (partly) compensate for each other in predicting academic effort and achievement. We extend previous work by testing the CONIC model in two independent U.S. samples from different age groups (high school sample: N = 1,246, Mage = 14.86 years; college sample: N = 581, Mage = 19.83 years). We also assessed whether the compensatory relations occur when grit is substituted for conscientiousness and students’ overall task value or utility value for interest. We preregistered the study and tested the various models for both science and math effort as well as achievement, using latent variable regression analyses. Overall, we found some support for the CONIC model in the U.S. samples. There was also some support for the extensions of the model to the other constructs; however, the predictive links were not as strong.
期刊介绍：
Emphasizing experimental and descriptive research, the Journal of Research in Personality presents articles that examine important issues in the field of personality and in related fields basic to the understanding of personality. The subject matter includes treatments of genetic, physiological, motivational, learning, perceptual, cognitive, and social processes of both normal and abnormal kinds in human and animal subjects. Features: • Papers that present integrated sets of studies that address significant theoretical issues relating to personality. • Theoretical papers and critical reviews of current experimental and methodological interest. • Single, well-designed studies of an innovative nature. • Brief reports, including replication or null result studies of previously reported findings, or a well-designed studies addressing questions of limited scope.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
