法医学领域的科学活动是戒严法下法医学研究的方法论基础

Aleksandar Ivanović, E. Simakova-Yefremian, Yevhen Pivnov
{"title":"法医学领域的科学活动是戒严法下法医学研究的方法论基础","authors":"Aleksandar Ivanović, E. Simakova-Yefremian, Yevhen Pivnov","doi":"10.32353/khrife.3.2023.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In its essence, research method is a pool of techniques, methods and operations of practical and theoretical actions of person aimed at learning about an object. Foreign scientific schools often do not distinguish between methodology and research methods. Domestic scientific tradition considers methodology as a teaching about scientific method of cognition or as a system of scientific which principles research is based and on which determining totality of its cognitive means, methods and techniques. Another important basis for differentiating methods is the division by the degree of their influence on preservation of objects of forensic examination. The purpose of this work (for which achievement general scientific, separate and special methods are applied) is to investigate the issues of methodology of forensic science, methods and techniques of expert research in the conditions of martial law and global threats related to crimes of Russian aggressor against Ukraine. Analysis of terms and concepts was carried out, their own definitions were proposed and the need to improve the scientific and methodological provisions of forensic expert activity was emphasized. Despite  objective problems associated with martial law, scientists and experts of the system of forensic science institutions of Ukraine persistently continue their scientific activities, since specific expertise application in the form of expert conclusion is a guarantee of expert provision of justice in the state. At the same time, solution of forensic examination tasks should be based on a reliable, modern scientific and methodical base requiring scientific research on theoretical and methodological issues. Analysis of regulatory control of accounting of forensic science methods was carried out. According to results of consideration of issues of international cooperation in the field of forensic science during the war, urgent problems were singled out, including involvement of foreign experts in conducting forensic examinations in Ukraine which requires regulatory control in the Law of Ukraine “On Judicial Examination”. The R&D topic of  (on the example of National Scientific Center «Hon. Prof. M. S. Bokarius Forensic Science Institute») related to the challenges of the war was studied that confirmed relevance of issues raised for the modern stage of development of forensic science.","PeriodicalId":340932,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scientific activity in the field of forensic science is the methodology basis forensic researches under martial law\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandar Ivanović, E. Simakova-Yefremian, Yevhen Pivnov\",\"doi\":\"10.32353/khrife.3.2023.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In its essence, research method is a pool of techniques, methods and operations of practical and theoretical actions of person aimed at learning about an object. Foreign scientific schools often do not distinguish between methodology and research methods. Domestic scientific tradition considers methodology as a teaching about scientific method of cognition or as a system of scientific which principles research is based and on which determining totality of its cognitive means, methods and techniques. Another important basis for differentiating methods is the division by the degree of their influence on preservation of objects of forensic examination. The purpose of this work (for which achievement general scientific, separate and special methods are applied) is to investigate the issues of methodology of forensic science, methods and techniques of expert research in the conditions of martial law and global threats related to crimes of Russian aggressor against Ukraine. Analysis of terms and concepts was carried out, their own definitions were proposed and the need to improve the scientific and methodological provisions of forensic expert activity was emphasized. Despite  objective problems associated with martial law, scientists and experts of the system of forensic science institutions of Ukraine persistently continue their scientific activities, since specific expertise application in the form of expert conclusion is a guarantee of expert provision of justice in the state. At the same time, solution of forensic examination tasks should be based on a reliable, modern scientific and methodical base requiring scientific research on theoretical and methodological issues. Analysis of regulatory control of accounting of forensic science methods was carried out. According to results of consideration of issues of international cooperation in the field of forensic science during the war, urgent problems were singled out, including involvement of foreign experts in conducting forensic examinations in Ukraine which requires regulatory control in the Law of Ukraine “On Judicial Examination”. The R&D topic of  (on the example of National Scientific Center «Hon. Prof. M. S. Bokarius Forensic Science Institute») related to the challenges of the war was studied that confirmed relevance of issues raised for the modern stage of development of forensic science.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.3.2023.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.3.2023.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从本质上讲,研究方法是一个人旨在了解某一对象的实践和理论行动的技术、方法和操作的集合。国外的科学流派往往不区分方法论和研究方法。国内的科学传统认为,方法论是一种关于科学认知方法的教学,或者说是一种科学体系,它是研究原则的基础,并在此基础上决定其认知手段、方法和技术的整体。区分方法的另一个重要依据是根据其对保存法医检验对象的影响程度进行划分。这项工作的目的(为此采用了一般科学方法、单独方法和特殊方法)是研究戒严条件下的法医学方法、专家研究的方法和技术问题以及与俄罗斯侵略者对乌克兰的犯罪有关的全球威胁。对术语和概念进行了分析,提出了各自的定义,并强调了改进法医专家活动的科学和方法规定的必要性。尽管存在与戒严有关的客观问题,乌克兰法医科学机构系统的科学家和专家仍坚持不懈地开展科学活动,因为以专家结论的形式应用特定专业知识是国家司法的专家保障。同时,法医检查任务的解决应建立在可靠、现代科学和方法的基础上,需要对理论和方法问题进行科学研究。对法医科学方法的会计监管进行了分析。根据对战争期间法医学领域国际合作问题的审议结果,挑出了一些亟待解决的问题,其中包括外国专家参与在乌克兰进行的法医检查,这需要乌克兰《司法考试法》的监管控制。研究了与战争挑战有关的研发课题(以国家科学中心 "博卡利斯法医学研究所 "为例),证实了所提出的问题与现代法医学发展阶段的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scientific activity in the field of forensic science is the methodology basis forensic researches under martial law
In its essence, research method is a pool of techniques, methods and operations of practical and theoretical actions of person aimed at learning about an object. Foreign scientific schools often do not distinguish between methodology and research methods. Domestic scientific tradition considers methodology as a teaching about scientific method of cognition or as a system of scientific which principles research is based and on which determining totality of its cognitive means, methods and techniques. Another important basis for differentiating methods is the division by the degree of their influence on preservation of objects of forensic examination. The purpose of this work (for which achievement general scientific, separate and special methods are applied) is to investigate the issues of methodology of forensic science, methods and techniques of expert research in the conditions of martial law and global threats related to crimes of Russian aggressor against Ukraine. Analysis of terms and concepts was carried out, their own definitions were proposed and the need to improve the scientific and methodological provisions of forensic expert activity was emphasized. Despite  objective problems associated with martial law, scientists and experts of the system of forensic science institutions of Ukraine persistently continue their scientific activities, since specific expertise application in the form of expert conclusion is a guarantee of expert provision of justice in the state. At the same time, solution of forensic examination tasks should be based on a reliable, modern scientific and methodical base requiring scientific research on theoretical and methodological issues. Analysis of regulatory control of accounting of forensic science methods was carried out. According to results of consideration of issues of international cooperation in the field of forensic science during the war, urgent problems were singled out, including involvement of foreign experts in conducting forensic examinations in Ukraine which requires regulatory control in the Law of Ukraine “On Judicial Examination”. The R&D topic of  (on the example of National Scientific Center «Hon. Prof. M. S. Bokarius Forensic Science Institute») related to the challenges of the war was studied that confirmed relevance of issues raised for the modern stage of development of forensic science.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信