使用含 20% 硅灰和偏高岭土的新型浮石与传统混凝土比较 M30 级混凝土抗压强度的实验研究

Q4 Materials Science
Balasubramani Ravi, Lakshmi Thangasamy
{"title":"使用含 20% 硅灰和偏高岭土的新型浮石与传统混凝土比较 M30 级混凝土抗压强度的实验研究","authors":"Balasubramani Ravi, Lakshmi Thangasamy","doi":"10.17756/nwj.2023-s3-045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective was to compare the use of M30 grade concrete admixture to partially replace coarse aggregate in lightweight concrete with a novel pumice aggregate using conventional concrete. Two groups prepared in 70% cement mixture and instead of 20% silica fume, 10% metakaolin was fixed in this concrete. Novel pumice was used as coarse aggregate and M-sand as fine aggregate. An independent t-test was calculated using 80% G-power. Metakaolin and silica fume are purchased from scientific institutes and novel pumice is arranged from online traders. Results: The group of 18 cubes was formed according to the curing date for 28 days. A total of two groups were prepared and a total of 36 cubes were prepared to find the compressive strength. The independent sample t-test on two groups showed that there was a statistically significant difference with p < 0.000 (p < 0.05). This represents group statistics for a sample group of 20% silica fume and 10% of metakaolin and novel pumice stone as coarse aggregate. mean (34.3311, 36.8061), standard deviation (1.65492, 1.58424), and standard error mean (0.39007, 0.37341). The average M30 grade of concrete at 28 days of compressive strength test result of conventional concrete is 34.33 N/mm 2 . The M30 Grade of concrete at 28 days of compressive strength test result of concrete with novel pumice stone and partial replacement of silica fume and metakaolin by the weight of cement is 36.80 N/mm 2 for average result of group 1 and for 18 cubes. The compressive strength of M30 grade of concrete at 28 days of compressive strength test result of concrete with novel pumice stone and partial replacement of silica fume and metakaolin by the weight of cement is increased in the percentage of 6.67% over the conventional concrete. It shows better results and performance over conventional concrete.","PeriodicalId":36802,"journal":{"name":"NanoWorld Journal","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Study on Compressive Strength of M30 Grade of Concrete Using Novel Pumice with 20% Silica Fume and Metakaolin Comparing with Conventional Concrete\",\"authors\":\"Balasubramani Ravi, Lakshmi Thangasamy\",\"doi\":\"10.17756/nwj.2023-s3-045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective was to compare the use of M30 grade concrete admixture to partially replace coarse aggregate in lightweight concrete with a novel pumice aggregate using conventional concrete. Two groups prepared in 70% cement mixture and instead of 20% silica fume, 10% metakaolin was fixed in this concrete. Novel pumice was used as coarse aggregate and M-sand as fine aggregate. An independent t-test was calculated using 80% G-power. Metakaolin and silica fume are purchased from scientific institutes and novel pumice is arranged from online traders. Results: The group of 18 cubes was formed according to the curing date for 28 days. A total of two groups were prepared and a total of 36 cubes were prepared to find the compressive strength. The independent sample t-test on two groups showed that there was a statistically significant difference with p < 0.000 (p < 0.05). This represents group statistics for a sample group of 20% silica fume and 10% of metakaolin and novel pumice stone as coarse aggregate. mean (34.3311, 36.8061), standard deviation (1.65492, 1.58424), and standard error mean (0.39007, 0.37341). The average M30 grade of concrete at 28 days of compressive strength test result of conventional concrete is 34.33 N/mm 2 . The M30 Grade of concrete at 28 days of compressive strength test result of concrete with novel pumice stone and partial replacement of silica fume and metakaolin by the weight of cement is 36.80 N/mm 2 for average result of group 1 and for 18 cubes. The compressive strength of M30 grade of concrete at 28 days of compressive strength test result of concrete with novel pumice stone and partial replacement of silica fume and metakaolin by the weight of cement is increased in the percentage of 6.67% over the conventional concrete. It shows better results and performance over conventional concrete.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NanoWorld Journal\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NanoWorld Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17756/nwj.2023-s3-045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Materials Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NanoWorld Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17756/nwj.2023-s3-045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究的目的是比较在轻质混凝土中使用 M30 级混凝土外加剂部分替代粗骨料与传统混凝土中使用新型浮石骨料的效果。在 70% 的水泥混合物中制备了两组混凝土,并在其中添加了 10% 的偏高岭土,而不是 20% 的硅灰。新型浮石用作粗骨料,中砂用作细骨料。使用 80% 的 G 功率进行独立 t 检验。偏高岭土和硅灰从科研机构购买,新型浮石从网上商城购买。结果:根据 28 天的固化日期,每组 18 块立方体。总共制备了两组,共 36 块立方体,以测定抗压强度。对两组进行的独立样本 t 检验表明,两组之间存在显著的统计学差异,p < 0.000(p < 0.05)。平均值(34.3311,36.8061),标准偏差(1.65492,1.58424),标准误差平均值(0.39007,0.37341)。传统混凝土 28 天抗压强度测试结果的 M30 等级平均值为 34.33 牛顿/毫米 2 。使用新型浮石并用水泥重量部分替代硅灰和偏高岭土的混凝土,28 天抗压强度测试结果的 M30 等级为 36.80 牛顿/毫米 2(第 1 组平均结果),18 个立方体的平均结果为 36.80 牛顿/毫米 2。使用新型浮石并用水泥重量部分替代硅灰和偏高岭土的 M30 级混凝土在 28 天抗压强度测试结果中的抗压强度比传统混凝土提高了 6.67%。与传统混凝土相比,它显示出更好的效果和性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental Study on Compressive Strength of M30 Grade of Concrete Using Novel Pumice with 20% Silica Fume and Metakaolin Comparing with Conventional Concrete
The objective was to compare the use of M30 grade concrete admixture to partially replace coarse aggregate in lightweight concrete with a novel pumice aggregate using conventional concrete. Two groups prepared in 70% cement mixture and instead of 20% silica fume, 10% metakaolin was fixed in this concrete. Novel pumice was used as coarse aggregate and M-sand as fine aggregate. An independent t-test was calculated using 80% G-power. Metakaolin and silica fume are purchased from scientific institutes and novel pumice is arranged from online traders. Results: The group of 18 cubes was formed according to the curing date for 28 days. A total of two groups were prepared and a total of 36 cubes were prepared to find the compressive strength. The independent sample t-test on two groups showed that there was a statistically significant difference with p < 0.000 (p < 0.05). This represents group statistics for a sample group of 20% silica fume and 10% of metakaolin and novel pumice stone as coarse aggregate. mean (34.3311, 36.8061), standard deviation (1.65492, 1.58424), and standard error mean (0.39007, 0.37341). The average M30 grade of concrete at 28 days of compressive strength test result of conventional concrete is 34.33 N/mm 2 . The M30 Grade of concrete at 28 days of compressive strength test result of concrete with novel pumice stone and partial replacement of silica fume and metakaolin by the weight of cement is 36.80 N/mm 2 for average result of group 1 and for 18 cubes. The compressive strength of M30 grade of concrete at 28 days of compressive strength test result of concrete with novel pumice stone and partial replacement of silica fume and metakaolin by the weight of cement is increased in the percentage of 6.67% over the conventional concrete. It shows better results and performance over conventional concrete.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NanoWorld Journal
NanoWorld Journal Materials Science-Polymers and Plastics
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信