国际法院或法庭能否以及是否应根据《联合国海洋法公约》定义 "海洋科学研究 "一词

Chuxiao Yu
{"title":"国际法院或法庭能否以及是否应根据《联合国海洋法公约》定义 \"海洋科学研究 \"一词","authors":"Chuxiao Yu","doi":"10.1163/15718085-bja10156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The term ‘marine scientific research’ (MSR) is included in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea without a definition. An examination of relevant drafting history reveals that the drafters of the Convention intentionally omitted the definition since they could not reach an agreement on this matter and had to leave it open for future development. Under Article 251 of the Convention, States shall seek to resolve the ambiguity surrounding the term MSR through competent international organisations. In terms of the legal clarification when the law is ambiguous, the role of international courts and tribunals cannot be overlooked. This article assesses the extent to which international judicial organs help to clarify the meaning of the term MSR by examining whether an international court or tribunal can or should define this term. It concludes that an international judicial organ should not define the term MSR in a general sense.","PeriodicalId":201830,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law","volume":"64 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can and Should an International Court or Tribunal Define the Term ‘Marine Scientific Research’ under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea\",\"authors\":\"Chuxiao Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718085-bja10156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The term ‘marine scientific research’ (MSR) is included in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea without a definition. An examination of relevant drafting history reveals that the drafters of the Convention intentionally omitted the definition since they could not reach an agreement on this matter and had to leave it open for future development. Under Article 251 of the Convention, States shall seek to resolve the ambiguity surrounding the term MSR through competent international organisations. In terms of the legal clarification when the law is ambiguous, the role of international courts and tribunals cannot be overlooked. This article assesses the extent to which international judicial organs help to clarify the meaning of the term MSR by examining whether an international court or tribunal can or should define this term. It concludes that an international judicial organ should not define the term MSR in a general sense.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law\",\"volume\":\"64 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718085-bja10156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718085-bja10156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海洋科学研究"(MSR)一词被列入《联合国海洋法公约》,但没有定义。对相关起草历史的研究表明,《公约》起草者有意省略了该定义,因为他们无法就此达成一致意见,只能留待未来发展。根据《公约》第 251 条,各国应寻求通过主管国际组织解决围绕 MSR 一词的含糊之处。在法律模棱两可的情况下进行法律澄清,国际法院和法庭的作用不容忽视。本文通过审查国际法院或法庭是否能够或应该界定 MSR 一词,评估国际司法机关在多大程度上有助于澄清该词的含义。文章得出结论认为,国际司法机关不应在一般意义上界定 MSR 一词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can and Should an International Court or Tribunal Define the Term ‘Marine Scientific Research’ under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
The term ‘marine scientific research’ (MSR) is included in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea without a definition. An examination of relevant drafting history reveals that the drafters of the Convention intentionally omitted the definition since they could not reach an agreement on this matter and had to leave it open for future development. Under Article 251 of the Convention, States shall seek to resolve the ambiguity surrounding the term MSR through competent international organisations. In terms of the legal clarification when the law is ambiguous, the role of international courts and tribunals cannot be overlooked. This article assesses the extent to which international judicial organs help to clarify the meaning of the term MSR by examining whether an international court or tribunal can or should define this term. It concludes that an international judicial organ should not define the term MSR in a general sense.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信