莱布尼茨的恶人道德心理学

Q4 Social Sciences

Dialogue Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI:10.1017/s0012217323000380

Evelyn Vargas, Markku Roinila

{"title":"莱布尼茨的恶人道德心理学","authors":"Evelyn Vargas, Markku Roinila","doi":"10.1017/s0012217323000380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our focus in this article concerns Leibniz's views on evil. Our goal is to examine which are the consequences of his conception of moral agency for the moral psychology of the genuinely evil person. For Leibniz, moral failure is an epistemic error since it involves some false practical judgement. Moral maxims may be represented in blind or symbolic cognitions, but then moral agents can misrepresent the evil consequences of their behaviour. Finally, we discuss Leibniz's view on habits that may help virtuous persons strive for perfection but also enable evil persons to continue sinning.","PeriodicalId":11232,"journal":{"name":"Dialogue","volume":"78 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leibniz's Moral Psychology of an Evil Person\",\"authors\":\"Evelyn Vargas, Markku Roinila\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0012217323000380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our focus in this article concerns Leibniz's views on evil. Our goal is to examine which are the consequences of his conception of moral agency for the moral psychology of the genuinely evil person. For Leibniz, moral failure is an epistemic error since it involves some false practical judgement. Moral maxims may be represented in blind or symbolic cognitions, but then moral agents can misrepresent the evil consequences of their behaviour. Finally, we discuss Leibniz's view on habits that may help virtuous persons strive for perfection but also enable evil persons to continue sinning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialogue\",\"volume\":\"78 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialogue\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012217323000380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012217323000380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的重点是莱布尼茨关于恶的观点。我们的目标是研究他的道德代理概念对真正的恶人的道德心理有何影响。在莱布尼茨看来，道德失败是一种认识论上的错误，因为它涉及一些错误的实践判断。道德格言可以表现为盲目的或象征性的认知，但这样一来，道德主体就可能错误地表述其行为的恶果。最后，我们将讨论莱布尼茨关于习惯的观点，这些习惯可能有助于有德行的人追求完美，但也可能使邪恶的人继续犯罪。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Leibniz's Moral Psychology of an Evil Person

Our focus in this article concerns Leibniz's views on evil. Our goal is to examine which are the consequences of his conception of moral agency for the moral psychology of the genuinely evil person. For Leibniz, moral failure is an epistemic error since it involves some false practical judgement. Moral maxims may be represented in blind or symbolic cognitions, but then moral agents can misrepresent the evil consequences of their behaviour. Finally, we discuss Leibniz's view on habits that may help virtuous persons strive for perfection but also enable evil persons to continue sinning.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Dialogue Social Sciences-Development

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Dialogue is the official journal of the Canadian Philosophical Association. Its purpose is to publish high quality peer-reviewed scholarly articles, book symposia, critical notices, and book reviews in English and in French, in support of the Association"s mandate to promote philosophical scholarship and education. It is open to contributions in all branches of philosophy and from any philosophical perspective. Readers include professional teachers of philosophy, graduate students, and others with an interest in the field. Published for the Canadian Philosophical Association