Analysis of treatment outcomes in patients with combat spinal column and spinal cord injuries

Introduction. Spinal column and spinal cord injuries are one of the most severe types of trauma. The paper presents the results of examination and treatment of 80 patients with combat spinal column and spinal cord injuries treated in the neurosurgical department of the FSBI National Medical Research Center for High Medical Technologies — A. A. Vishnevsky Central Military Clinical Hospital. Purpose. To analyze the structure of incoming wounded patients and the results of treatment of patients with combat spinal injury in the conditions of a multidisciplinary medical center. Materials and methods. The paper analyzes the results of treatment of 80 patients with combat spinal column and spinal cord injuries treated in the Neurosurgery Center, FSBI National Medical Research Center for High Medical Technologies — A. A. Vishnevsky Central Military Clinical Hospital. The inclusion criteria were the radiological signs of combat spinal injury upon admission to the hospital. Upon admission, all patients underwent pan CT scan, their somatic and neurological status was assessed, and laboratory parameters were evaluated. Gunshot wounds were found in 66.25 % (n=53) of the patients, and blunt combat injuries to the spine were found in 33.75 % (n=17). Concomitant injuries were sustained by 81.25 % (n=65) of the studied patients. Prior to admission to the Neurosurgery Center, neurosurgical care was provided to some of the wounded. Spinal surgery was performed in 30.0 % (n=24) of the cases, and 56.25 % (n=45) were operated on for injuries to other anatomical regions and organ systems. Results. 69 % (n=55) of the patients underwent neurosurgical treatment. The indication for surgery in 56.4 % (n=31) of the patients was instability in the spinal motion segment (SMS). Both one-stage (anterior or posterior stabilization) and two-stage operations consisting of posterior and anterior approaches, including with the use of minimally invasive techniques (8 cases), were performed. In 23 patients, foreign body removal was performed, including by means of videoimage endoscopy (in 5 cases). On average, the wounded had an operation on the 5th day after the injury. At discharge, motor neurological improvement or complete recovery was seen in 21.1 % (n=16) of the patients, while motor disorders remained at the initial level in 78.9 % (n=60). Sensory disorders decreased in 13.1 % (n=10), while 84.2 % (n=64) showed no improvement in sensory level. There was a significant decrease in the intensity of the pain syndrome. However, the number of patients with neuropathic pain decreased slightly (41 patients among all the examined at discharge versus 42 at admission). The functions of the pelvic organs were restored in 8.25 % (n=7) of the patients. At the stage of treatment in the specialized center, 49 % (n=39) of the patients had complications in different organ systems. The mortality rate was 2.5 % (n=2).