评估在精神科病房工作的护士的职业倦怠及其决定因素、职业压力的原因及其应对策略:混合方法研究

IF 0.6 Q4 Health Professions
Nitin Joseph, Kritika Chopra, R. K. Shiva
{"title":"评估在精神科病房工作的护士的职业倦怠及其决定因素、职业压力的原因及其应对策略:混合方法研究","authors":"Nitin Joseph, Kritika Chopra, R. K. Shiva","doi":"10.24083/apjhm.v18i3.2523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: This study assessed occupational burnout and its determinants, causes of occupational stress, and its coping strategies amongst 13 nurses working in the psychiatry wards in India. Methods: This was a longitudinal mixed-method study. The qualitative component comprised interviewing each participant under the steps of “free listing” and “pile sorting” to assess the causes of occupational stress and its coping strategies. The occupational burnout experiences were assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Results: Low-level depersonalization scores were present among six (46.1%) participants. Scores under this component of burnout were negatively correlated with years of work experience in providing nursing care for admitted psychiatric patients (rs = -0.548, p=0.05). Median scores of the emotional exhaustion scale (p=0.047) and of the depersonalization scale (p=0.016) were significantly higher among participants working at the government hospital. The major cause of occupational stress was poor infrastructure and treatment facilities with a salience score of 0.154. The most adopted strategies to tide over occupational stress were reading books and meditation with a salience score of 0.128 and 0.109 respectively. Conclusion: Extended work experience of participants was associated with their better ability to understand and empathize more with the patients as reflected by the low depersonalization scores. Two components of occupational burnout were found to be higher among nurses working in the government hospital. Organizational relationships were a more common cause of occupational stress than client-related matters among the participants. Recreational activities were the most common coping strategies adopted by the participants to deal with stress.","PeriodicalId":42935,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","volume":"117 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Occupational Burnout And Its Determinants, Causes of Occupational Stress, And Its Coping Strategies Among Nurses Working In The Psychiatric Wards: A mixed-method study\",\"authors\":\"Nitin Joseph, Kritika Chopra, R. K. Shiva\",\"doi\":\"10.24083/apjhm.v18i3.2523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims: This study assessed occupational burnout and its determinants, causes of occupational stress, and its coping strategies amongst 13 nurses working in the psychiatry wards in India. Methods: This was a longitudinal mixed-method study. The qualitative component comprised interviewing each participant under the steps of “free listing” and “pile sorting” to assess the causes of occupational stress and its coping strategies. The occupational burnout experiences were assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Results: Low-level depersonalization scores were present among six (46.1%) participants. Scores under this component of burnout were negatively correlated with years of work experience in providing nursing care for admitted psychiatric patients (rs = -0.548, p=0.05). Median scores of the emotional exhaustion scale (p=0.047) and of the depersonalization scale (p=0.016) were significantly higher among participants working at the government hospital. The major cause of occupational stress was poor infrastructure and treatment facilities with a salience score of 0.154. The most adopted strategies to tide over occupational stress were reading books and meditation with a salience score of 0.128 and 0.109 respectively. Conclusion: Extended work experience of participants was associated with their better ability to understand and empathize more with the patients as reflected by the low depersonalization scores. Two components of occupational burnout were found to be higher among nurses working in the government hospital. Organizational relationships were a more common cause of occupational stress than client-related matters among the participants. Recreational activities were the most common coping strategies adopted by the participants to deal with stress.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management\",\"volume\":\"117 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v18i3.2523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v18i3.2523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估了在印度精神科病房工作的 13 名护士的职业倦怠及其决定因素、职业压力的原因及其应对策略。 研究方法这是一项纵向混合方法研究。定性研究包括按照 "自由罗列 "和 "堆积排序 "的步骤对每位参与者进行访谈,以评估职业压力的成因及其应对策略。职业倦怠体验采用马斯拉赫职业倦怠量表进行评估。结果显示六名参与者(46.1%)的人格解体得分较低。职业倦怠的这一部分得分与为入院精神病人提供护理服务的工作年限呈负相关(rs = -0.548,p=0.05)。在政府医院工作的受试者的情绪衰竭量表(p=0.047)和人格解体量表(p=0.016)的中位数得分明显更高。造成职业压力的主要原因是基础设施和治疗设施不完善,其显著性得分为 0.154。最常用的克服职业压力的策略是阅读书籍和冥想,其显著性得分分别为 0.128 和 0.109。结论参与者的工作经验越长,就越能理解和同情病人,这一点从他们的人格解体得分较低可以看出。在政府医院工作的护士中,职业倦怠的两个组成部分较高。在参与者中,组织关系是造成职业压力的更常见原因,而不是与客户相关的问题。康乐活动是参与者最常采用的应对压力的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Occupational Burnout And Its Determinants, Causes of Occupational Stress, And Its Coping Strategies Among Nurses Working In The Psychiatric Wards: A mixed-method study
Aims: This study assessed occupational burnout and its determinants, causes of occupational stress, and its coping strategies amongst 13 nurses working in the psychiatry wards in India. Methods: This was a longitudinal mixed-method study. The qualitative component comprised interviewing each participant under the steps of “free listing” and “pile sorting” to assess the causes of occupational stress and its coping strategies. The occupational burnout experiences were assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Results: Low-level depersonalization scores were present among six (46.1%) participants. Scores under this component of burnout were negatively correlated with years of work experience in providing nursing care for admitted psychiatric patients (rs = -0.548, p=0.05). Median scores of the emotional exhaustion scale (p=0.047) and of the depersonalization scale (p=0.016) were significantly higher among participants working at the government hospital. The major cause of occupational stress was poor infrastructure and treatment facilities with a salience score of 0.154. The most adopted strategies to tide over occupational stress were reading books and meditation with a salience score of 0.128 and 0.109 respectively. Conclusion: Extended work experience of participants was associated with their better ability to understand and empathize more with the patients as reflected by the low depersonalization scores. Two components of occupational burnout were found to be higher among nurses working in the government hospital. Organizational relationships were a more common cause of occupational stress than client-related matters among the participants. Recreational activities were the most common coping strategies adopted by the participants to deal with stress.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
51
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信