设计和建立框架的方法,以监测和评估公民科学中心的绩效和影响

M. Angelidou , C. Politis , E. Roma-Athanasiadou , N. Premyanov
{"title":"设计和建立框架的方法,以监测和评估公民科学中心的绩效和影响","authors":"M. Angelidou ,&nbsp;C. Politis ,&nbsp;E. Roma-Athanasiadou ,&nbsp;N. Premyanov","doi":"10.1016/j.socimp.2023.100031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Universities around the world are establishing hubs that promote and support citizen science. A key challenge to the long-term sustainability of such hubs is the absence of an objective, transparent, and efficient way to measure their performance and impact. The main reason is that the benefits of citizen science do not linearly follow an input-to-impact intervention logic. In response, we propose a methodology for developing a dedicated monitoring and evaluation framework. All steps from design to implementation are described, accompanied by examples from INCENTIVE, a project where our methodology was tested in real-life settings. The results indicate that our methodology, with minor adaptations, can be used by similar types of hub setting such as living labs, city labs, innovation hubs, science and technology parks, etc.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101167,"journal":{"name":"Societal Impacts","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100031"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949697723000310/pdfft?md5=e026877cd013e44d6f94c71d96ca81d8&pid=1-s2.0-S2949697723000310-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodology to design and set up a framework to monitor and evaluate a Citizen Science Hub’s performance and impact\",\"authors\":\"M. Angelidou ,&nbsp;C. Politis ,&nbsp;E. Roma-Athanasiadou ,&nbsp;N. Premyanov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socimp.2023.100031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Universities around the world are establishing hubs that promote and support citizen science. A key challenge to the long-term sustainability of such hubs is the absence of an objective, transparent, and efficient way to measure their performance and impact. The main reason is that the benefits of citizen science do not linearly follow an input-to-impact intervention logic. In response, we propose a methodology for developing a dedicated monitoring and evaluation framework. All steps from design to implementation are described, accompanied by examples from INCENTIVE, a project where our methodology was tested in real-life settings. The results indicate that our methodology, with minor adaptations, can be used by similar types of hub setting such as living labs, city labs, innovation hubs, science and technology parks, etc.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Societal Impacts\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949697723000310/pdfft?md5=e026877cd013e44d6f94c71d96ca81d8&pid=1-s2.0-S2949697723000310-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Societal Impacts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949697723000310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societal Impacts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949697723000310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界各地的大学正在建立促进和支持公民科学的中心。这些中心的长期可持续性面临的一个主要挑战是缺乏一种客观、透明和有效的方式来衡量其绩效和影响。主要原因是,公民科学的益处并不是按照投入到影响的干预逻辑线性发展的。为此,我们提出了一种制定专门监测和评估框架的方法。我们介绍了从设计到实施的所有步骤,并列举了 INCENTIVE 项目的实例,在该项目中,我们的方法在实际环境中得到了检验。结果表明,我们的方法只需稍作调整,即可用于类似类型的中心环境,如生活实验室、城市实验室、创新中心、科技园等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methodology to design and set up a framework to monitor and evaluate a Citizen Science Hub’s performance and impact

Universities around the world are establishing hubs that promote and support citizen science. A key challenge to the long-term sustainability of such hubs is the absence of an objective, transparent, and efficient way to measure their performance and impact. The main reason is that the benefits of citizen science do not linearly follow an input-to-impact intervention logic. In response, we propose a methodology for developing a dedicated monitoring and evaluation framework. All steps from design to implementation are described, accompanied by examples from INCENTIVE, a project where our methodology was tested in real-life settings. The results indicate that our methodology, with minor adaptations, can be used by similar types of hub setting such as living labs, city labs, innovation hubs, science and technology parks, etc.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信