{"title":"有和无注射吸毒史的血管通路装置住院患者的住院时间、住院费用和感染率","authors":"Laura Soloway, Tarja Kärpänen","doi":"10.2309/java-d-23-00015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rate of IDU among those who received a VAD placement was 3%. The VAD + IDU patients had 1.8 times longer mean LOS than VAD-only cohorts. The VAD + IDU cohort had 1.9 times higher mean inpatient cost than VAD-only cohorts. PPCRI increased in VAD + IDU cohort during pandemic.","PeriodicalId":504313,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Length of Stay, Hospitalization Cost, and Infection Rate for Inpatients With Vascular Access Devices With and Without History of Injection Drug Use\",\"authors\":\"Laura Soloway, Tarja Kärpänen\",\"doi\":\"10.2309/java-d-23-00015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rate of IDU among those who received a VAD placement was 3%. The VAD + IDU patients had 1.8 times longer mean LOS than VAD-only cohorts. The VAD + IDU cohort had 1.9 times higher mean inpatient cost than VAD-only cohorts. PPCRI increased in VAD + IDU cohort during pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Association for Vascular Access\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Association for Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2309/java-d-23-00015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2309/java-d-23-00015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在接受 VAD 安置的患者中,IDU 的比例为 3%。VAD + IDU 患者的平均住院时间是纯 VAD 患者的 1.8 倍。VAD + IDU 组群的平均住院费用是纯 VAD 组群的 1.9 倍。大流行期间,VAD + IDU 组群的 PPCRI 增加。
Length of Stay, Hospitalization Cost, and Infection Rate for Inpatients With Vascular Access Devices With and Without History of Injection Drug Use
The rate of IDU among those who received a VAD placement was 3%. The VAD + IDU patients had 1.8 times longer mean LOS than VAD-only cohorts. The VAD + IDU cohort had 1.9 times higher mean inpatient cost than VAD-only cohorts. PPCRI increased in VAD + IDU cohort during pandemic.