美国总统拜登演讲中的俄罗斯乌克兰战争去合法化:批判性话语分析

Mervat Ahmed
{"title":"美国总统拜登演讲中的俄罗斯乌克兰战争去合法化:批判性话语分析","authors":"Mervat Ahmed","doi":"10.21608/ttaip.2023.331321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study adopts a critical discourse analysis approach to examine the strategies employed by US President Joe Biden in his speeches to de-legitimize the Russian war in Ukraine that started in 2022. The study applies van Leeuwen’s (2007) (de) legitimation strategies model. Two speeches, extracted from the White House official website and delivered by President Biden on two different occasions during the first few months of the war being waged, are analyzed. The results reveal US President Biden’s tendency to rely mainly on three de-legitimation categories. The most frequently employed strategy is moral evaluation through evaluative modifiers and abstraction. The second most frequent strategy is authorization mainly through authority of conformity, in addition to impersonal and personal authority. Finally, both instrumental and theoretical rationalization are employed to delegitimate the Russian war in Ukraine and legitimize the US assistance provided to it.","PeriodicalId":276703,"journal":{"name":"Textual Turnings: An International Peer-Reviewed Journal in English Studies","volume":"54 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"De-Legitimating the Russian War in Ukraine in US President Biden’s Speeches: A Critical Discourse Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Mervat Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ttaip.2023.331321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study adopts a critical discourse analysis approach to examine the strategies employed by US President Joe Biden in his speeches to de-legitimize the Russian war in Ukraine that started in 2022. The study applies van Leeuwen’s (2007) (de) legitimation strategies model. Two speeches, extracted from the White House official website and delivered by President Biden on two different occasions during the first few months of the war being waged, are analyzed. The results reveal US President Biden’s tendency to rely mainly on three de-legitimation categories. The most frequently employed strategy is moral evaluation through evaluative modifiers and abstraction. The second most frequent strategy is authorization mainly through authority of conformity, in addition to impersonal and personal authority. Finally, both instrumental and theoretical rationalization are employed to delegitimate the Russian war in Ukraine and legitimize the US assistance provided to it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":276703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Textual Turnings: An International Peer-Reviewed Journal in English Studies\",\"volume\":\"54 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Textual Turnings: An International Peer-Reviewed Journal in English Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ttaip.2023.331321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Textual Turnings: An International Peer-Reviewed Journal in English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ttaip.2023.331321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用批判性话语分析方法,研究美国总统乔-拜登在其演讲中为使俄罗斯于 2022 年在乌克兰发动的战争合法化而采取的策略。研究采用了 van Leeuwen(2007)的(de)合法化策略模型。研究分析了从白宫官方网站上提取的两篇演讲,这两篇演讲是拜登总统在战争爆发的头几个月在两个不同场合发表的。结果显示,美国总统拜登倾向于主要依赖三种去合法化策略。最常使用的策略是通过评价性修饰词和抽象概念进行道德评价。第二种最常用的策略是授权,主要是通过一致性权威,此外还有非个人权威和个人权威。最后,工具合理化和理论合理化都被用来使俄罗斯在乌克兰的战争合法化,并使美国向其提供的援助合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
De-Legitimating the Russian War in Ukraine in US President Biden’s Speeches: A Critical Discourse Analysis
This study adopts a critical discourse analysis approach to examine the strategies employed by US President Joe Biden in his speeches to de-legitimize the Russian war in Ukraine that started in 2022. The study applies van Leeuwen’s (2007) (de) legitimation strategies model. Two speeches, extracted from the White House official website and delivered by President Biden on two different occasions during the first few months of the war being waged, are analyzed. The results reveal US President Biden’s tendency to rely mainly on three de-legitimation categories. The most frequently employed strategy is moral evaluation through evaluative modifiers and abstraction. The second most frequent strategy is authorization mainly through authority of conformity, in addition to impersonal and personal authority. Finally, both instrumental and theoretical rationalization are employed to delegitimate the Russian war in Ukraine and legitimize the US assistance provided to it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信