Windows 11 和 Ubuntu 23.10 上不同数据类型压缩软件(WINRAR 和 7-Zip)的效率分析

Rakha Maulana, Bahteramon Bintang, Sanjaya Manurung, Nathanael Berliano, Novanka Putra, Aqwam Rosadi Kardian, Politeknik Siber dan Rekayasa Kriptografi, Sandi Negara
{"title":"Windows 11 和 Ubuntu 23.10 上不同数据类型压缩软件(WINRAR 和 7-Zip)的效率分析","authors":"Rakha Maulana, Bahteramon Bintang, Sanjaya Manurung, Nathanael Berliano, Novanka Putra, Aqwam Rosadi Kardian, Politeknik Siber dan Rekayasa Kriptografi, Sandi Negara","doi":"10.54209/infosains.v13i03.3505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the performance and efficiency of two widely used compression software, WINRAR and 7-Zip, across various data types. The study focuses on evaluating their effectiveness on different operating systems, specifically Windows 11 and Ubuntu 23.10. The analysis encompasses considerations such as compression ratios, resource utilization, and processing times. WINRAR and 7-Zip are examined in diverse scenarios, including the compression of text files (.txt), image files (.png), audio files (.flac), and video files (.mp4). The study reveals notable variations in compression outcomes influenced by intrinsic complexities of each file format. Moreover, the investigation extends beyond the initially studied operating systems, suggesting potential applications on other platforms like Kali Linux. The findings contribute insights into the nuanced performance of compression software across varied data types and operating environments, facilitating informed decision-making for users seeking optimal compression solutions.","PeriodicalId":508149,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Info Sains : Informatika dan Sains","volume":"21 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency Analysis of Compression Software (WINRAR and 7-Zip) Across Diverse Data Types on Windows 11 and Ubuntu 23.10\",\"authors\":\"Rakha Maulana, Bahteramon Bintang, Sanjaya Manurung, Nathanael Berliano, Novanka Putra, Aqwam Rosadi Kardian, Politeknik Siber dan Rekayasa Kriptografi, Sandi Negara\",\"doi\":\"10.54209/infosains.v13i03.3505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the performance and efficiency of two widely used compression software, WINRAR and 7-Zip, across various data types. The study focuses on evaluating their effectiveness on different operating systems, specifically Windows 11 and Ubuntu 23.10. The analysis encompasses considerations such as compression ratios, resource utilization, and processing times. WINRAR and 7-Zip are examined in diverse scenarios, including the compression of text files (.txt), image files (.png), audio files (.flac), and video files (.mp4). The study reveals notable variations in compression outcomes influenced by intrinsic complexities of each file format. Moreover, the investigation extends beyond the initially studied operating systems, suggesting potential applications on other platforms like Kali Linux. The findings contribute insights into the nuanced performance of compression software across varied data types and operating environments, facilitating informed decision-making for users seeking optimal compression solutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Info Sains : Informatika dan Sains\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Info Sains : Informatika dan Sains\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54209/infosains.v13i03.3505\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Info Sains : Informatika dan Sains","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54209/infosains.v13i03.3505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文全面分析了两款广泛使用的压缩软件 WINRAR 和 7-Zip 在不同数据类型下的性能和效率。研究重点是评估它们在不同操作系统上的有效性,特别是 Windows 11 和 Ubuntu 23.10。分析包括压缩率、资源利用率和处理时间等考虑因素。WINRAR 和 7-Zip 在压缩文本文件(.txt)、图像文件(.png)、音频文件(.flac)和视频文件(.mp4)等不同场景中进行了检验。研究显示,压缩结果受每种文件格式内在复杂性的影响而存在明显差异。此外,这项研究还超出了最初研究的操作系统的范围,显示了在 Kali Linux 等其他平台上的潜在应用。研究结果有助于深入了解压缩软件在不同数据类型和操作环境下的细微性能,从而为寻求最佳压缩解决方案的用户做出明智决策提供便利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficiency Analysis of Compression Software (WINRAR and 7-Zip) Across Diverse Data Types on Windows 11 and Ubuntu 23.10
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the performance and efficiency of two widely used compression software, WINRAR and 7-Zip, across various data types. The study focuses on evaluating their effectiveness on different operating systems, specifically Windows 11 and Ubuntu 23.10. The analysis encompasses considerations such as compression ratios, resource utilization, and processing times. WINRAR and 7-Zip are examined in diverse scenarios, including the compression of text files (.txt), image files (.png), audio files (.flac), and video files (.mp4). The study reveals notable variations in compression outcomes influenced by intrinsic complexities of each file format. Moreover, the investigation extends beyond the initially studied operating systems, suggesting potential applications on other platforms like Kali Linux. The findings contribute insights into the nuanced performance of compression software across varied data types and operating environments, facilitating informed decision-making for users seeking optimal compression solutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信