根据教法学派,"法尔杜 "与 "瓦吉布 "的区别

Shohibul Wafa Tadzul Arifin, M. Mustofa
{"title":"根据教法学派,\"法尔杜 \"与 \"瓦吉布 \"的区别","authors":"Shohibul Wafa Tadzul Arifin, M. Mustofa","doi":"10.30863/as-hki.v5i2.5525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the differences between the concepts of Fardhu and  wâjib in ahkamul khamsah, by analyzing the opinions of madhhab scholars. This study uses a normative method with a literature review sourced from the books of fiqh scholars. The results of the analysis show that the majority of fuqaha equate wâjib and fardhu at the term and application level even though they differ in naming. However, the madhhab Hanafi believes that there is a special term in the case of worship which makes wâjib and fardhu different.","PeriodicalId":504007,"journal":{"name":"AL-SYAKHSHIYYAH Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam dan Kemanusiaan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERBEDAAN FARDHU DAN WÂJIB MENURUT MAZHAB FIQH\",\"authors\":\"Shohibul Wafa Tadzul Arifin, M. Mustofa\",\"doi\":\"10.30863/as-hki.v5i2.5525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses the differences between the concepts of Fardhu and  wâjib in ahkamul khamsah, by analyzing the opinions of madhhab scholars. This study uses a normative method with a literature review sourced from the books of fiqh scholars. The results of the analysis show that the majority of fuqaha equate wâjib and fardhu at the term and application level even though they differ in naming. However, the madhhab Hanafi believes that there is a special term in the case of worship which makes wâjib and fardhu different.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AL-SYAKHSHIYYAH Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam dan Kemanusiaan\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AL-SYAKHSHIYYAH Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam dan Kemanusiaan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30863/as-hki.v5i2.5525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AL-SYAKHSHIYYAH Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam dan Kemanusiaan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30863/as-hki.v5i2.5525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过分析伊斯兰教法学者的观点,讨论了 "法尔杜"(Fardhu)和 "瓦吉卜"(wâjib)这两个概念在伊斯兰教法中的区别。本研究采用规范法,从教法学者的著作中查阅文献。分析结果表明,大多数法卡在术语和应用层面上将 wâjib 和 fardhu 等同起来,尽管它们在命名上有所不同。然而,哈乃斐教派认为,在礼拜的情况下,有一个特殊的术语使 wâjib 和 fardhu 有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PERBEDAAN FARDHU DAN WÂJIB MENURUT MAZHAB FIQH
This article discusses the differences between the concepts of Fardhu and  wâjib in ahkamul khamsah, by analyzing the opinions of madhhab scholars. This study uses a normative method with a literature review sourced from the books of fiqh scholars. The results of the analysis show that the majority of fuqaha equate wâjib and fardhu at the term and application level even though they differ in naming. However, the madhhab Hanafi believes that there is a special term in the case of worship which makes wâjib and fardhu different.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信