乌克兰刑事案件诉讼中的财产扣押:问题所在

Oleg Lyuty, Olena Kovalchuk
{"title":"乌克兰刑事案件诉讼中的财产扣押:问题所在","authors":"Oleg Lyuty, Olena Kovalchuk","doi":"10.23939/law2023.40.334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Annotation. The article deals with the topical issues of applying such a measure of securing criminal proceedings as seizure of property. Particular attention is paid to the legal status of the third party in relation to whose property the issue of seizure is being resolved, problematic issues that arise in the process of seizure of property and when criminal proceedings are closed during the pre-trial investigation and the issue of lifting the seizure of property has not been resolved are analyzed. Attention is also drawn to the fact that, in addition to the problems that arise during the seizure of property, no fewer issues arise during the cancellation of such seizures, especially if the seized property must be realized within the framework of other legal relations, for example, within the framework of a bankruptcy case or in within the scope of executive proceedings. Despite numerous changes regarding the regulation of property seizure, it is proposed to make changes to the current Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine in terms of solving the following issues: regarding the property subject to seizure; certainty of the legal status of third parties whose property is subject to seizure, and bona fide purchasers; the composition of the participants in the court session regarding the seizure of property; which arise in case of closing of criminal proceedings or cancellation of arrest. It is proposed to supplement Article 175 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine with a detailed procedure for the execution of a decree on the seizure of property, as well as a record of this process.","PeriodicalId":505933,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","volume":"49 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imposition of arrests on property in criminal cases proceedings in Ukraine: problem issues\",\"authors\":\"Oleg Lyuty, Olena Kovalchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.23939/law2023.40.334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Annotation. The article deals with the topical issues of applying such a measure of securing criminal proceedings as seizure of property. Particular attention is paid to the legal status of the third party in relation to whose property the issue of seizure is being resolved, problematic issues that arise in the process of seizure of property and when criminal proceedings are closed during the pre-trial investigation and the issue of lifting the seizure of property has not been resolved are analyzed. Attention is also drawn to the fact that, in addition to the problems that arise during the seizure of property, no fewer issues arise during the cancellation of such seizures, especially if the seized property must be realized within the framework of other legal relations, for example, within the framework of a bankruptcy case or in within the scope of executive proceedings. Despite numerous changes regarding the regulation of property seizure, it is proposed to make changes to the current Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine in terms of solving the following issues: regarding the property subject to seizure; certainty of the legal status of third parties whose property is subject to seizure, and bona fide purchasers; the composition of the participants in the court session regarding the seizure of property; which arise in case of closing of criminal proceedings or cancellation of arrest. It is proposed to supplement Article 175 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine with a detailed procedure for the execution of a decree on the seizure of property, as well as a record of this process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki\",\"volume\":\"49 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.40.334\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.40.334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

注释。文章论述了适用扣押财产这种保障刑事诉讼措施的热点问题。文章特别关注了第三方的法律地位、财产扣押过程中出现的问题、在审前调查期间结束刑事诉讼时出现的问题以及尚未解决的解除财产扣押问题。还提请注意的是,除了在扣押财产过程中出现的问题外,在取消扣押过程中出现的问题也不少,特别是当被扣押财产必须在其他法律关系框架内变现时,例如在破产案件框架内或在执行程序范围内。尽管对财产扣押的规定进行了许多修改,但仍建议对现行《乌克兰刑事诉讼法》进行修改,以解决以下问题:关于扣押财产;财产被扣押的第三方和善意购买者的法律地位的确定性;关于扣押财产的法庭开庭参与者的组成;在刑事诉讼结束或取消逮捕的情况下出现的问题。建议对《乌克兰刑事诉讼法典》第 175 条进行补充,规定执行财产扣押令的详细程序,以及该过程的记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Imposition of arrests on property in criminal cases proceedings in Ukraine: problem issues
Annotation. The article deals with the topical issues of applying such a measure of securing criminal proceedings as seizure of property. Particular attention is paid to the legal status of the third party in relation to whose property the issue of seizure is being resolved, problematic issues that arise in the process of seizure of property and when criminal proceedings are closed during the pre-trial investigation and the issue of lifting the seizure of property has not been resolved are analyzed. Attention is also drawn to the fact that, in addition to the problems that arise during the seizure of property, no fewer issues arise during the cancellation of such seizures, especially if the seized property must be realized within the framework of other legal relations, for example, within the framework of a bankruptcy case or in within the scope of executive proceedings. Despite numerous changes regarding the regulation of property seizure, it is proposed to make changes to the current Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine in terms of solving the following issues: regarding the property subject to seizure; certainty of the legal status of third parties whose property is subject to seizure, and bona fide purchasers; the composition of the participants in the court session regarding the seizure of property; which arise in case of closing of criminal proceedings or cancellation of arrest. It is proposed to supplement Article 175 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine with a detailed procedure for the execution of a decree on the seizure of property, as well as a record of this process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信