{"title":"Said Aljoumani 和 Konrad Hirschler:《中世纪耶路撒冷的藏书和文献保存》:Said Aljoumani 和 Konrad Hirschler:《中世纪耶路撒冷的藏书和文献保存:布尔汉-丁的图书馆》(爱丁堡伊斯兰古典历史和文化研究),xii, 394 页。爱丁堡:爱丁堡大学出版社,2023 年。ISBN 978 1 47449206 5。","authors":"Adam Sabra","doi":"10.1017/S0041977X23000861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The work under review is a valuable contribution to two burgeoning sub-fields in the history of the pre-modern Middle East: the history of the book and the history of archival practices. The authors have already made important contributions to these fields, including studies of the Damascus Ashraf ī ya madrasa library and the library of Ibn ʿ Abd al-H ā d ī , a fifteenth-century Damascene scholar. If the first study focused on a large institutional library and the second dealt with the library of a well-known scholar of Prophetic tradition ( ḥ ad ī th ), this third instalment in the trilogy is concerned with the library and estate of a minor scholar who lived in fourteenth-century Jerusalem. The library is known to us through a series of court documents from Jerusalem assembled after Burh ā n al-D ī n ’ s death in 1387. The documents in question form part of a corpus known as the Ḥ aram documents because they were discovered in the Islamic Museum located in al-Ḥ aram al-Shar ī f in Jerusalem. The vast majority of these 950 documents pertain to the tenure of one Sh ā fi ʿ ī judge in Jerusalem who was accused of misappropriating funds from pious endow-ments, leading to an investigation. They were first catalogued by Donald Little and previously utilized by Huda Lufti for a study of Jerusalem society in the fourteenth century and by Christian Müller to study judicial practice. There are quite a few estate inventories in this corpus of documents, but the documentation of Burh ā n al-D ī n ’ s library, including an extensive inventory that the authors call a sales booklet, is unique. The authors point out that this is the earliest library in Greater Syria for which we have detailed documentation. Burh ā n al-D ī n is an interesting figure precisely because he would otherwise be unknown","PeriodicalId":9459,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies","volume":"19 7","pages":"586 - 587"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Said Aljoumani and Konrad Hirschler: Owning Books and Preserving Documents in Medieval Jerusalem: The Library of Burhan al-Din (Edinburgh Studies in Classical Islamic History and Culture.) xii, 394 pp. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2023. ISBN 978 1 47449206 5.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Sabra\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0041977X23000861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The work under review is a valuable contribution to two burgeoning sub-fields in the history of the pre-modern Middle East: the history of the book and the history of archival practices. The authors have already made important contributions to these fields, including studies of the Damascus Ashraf ī ya madrasa library and the library of Ibn ʿ Abd al-H ā d ī , a fifteenth-century Damascene scholar. If the first study focused on a large institutional library and the second dealt with the library of a well-known scholar of Prophetic tradition ( ḥ ad ī th ), this third instalment in the trilogy is concerned with the library and estate of a minor scholar who lived in fourteenth-century Jerusalem. The library is known to us through a series of court documents from Jerusalem assembled after Burh ā n al-D ī n ’ s death in 1387. The documents in question form part of a corpus known as the Ḥ aram documents because they were discovered in the Islamic Museum located in al-Ḥ aram al-Shar ī f in Jerusalem. The vast majority of these 950 documents pertain to the tenure of one Sh ā fi ʿ ī judge in Jerusalem who was accused of misappropriating funds from pious endow-ments, leading to an investigation. They were first catalogued by Donald Little and previously utilized by Huda Lufti for a study of Jerusalem society in the fourteenth century and by Christian Müller to study judicial practice. There are quite a few estate inventories in this corpus of documents, but the documentation of Burh ā n al-D ī n ’ s library, including an extensive inventory that the authors call a sales booklet, is unique. The authors point out that this is the earliest library in Greater Syria for which we have detailed documentation. Burh ā n al-D ī n is an interesting figure precisely because he would otherwise be unknown\",\"PeriodicalId\":9459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies\",\"volume\":\"19 7\",\"pages\":\"586 - 587\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X23000861\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X23000861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
所评论的这部作品是对前现代中东史两个新兴分支领域的宝贵贡献:图书史和档案实践史。作者已经在这些领域做出了重要贡献,包括对大马士革阿什拉菲亚宗教学校图书馆和十五世纪大马士革学者伊本-阿卜杜勒-哈迪(Ibn ʿ Abd al-H ā d ī)图书馆的研究。如果说第一项研究关注的是一个大型机构图书馆,第二项研究涉及的是一位著名先知传统学者(ḥ ad ī th)的图书馆,那么三部曲中的第三部研究的则是一位生活在十四世纪耶路撒冷的小学者的图书馆和遗产。我们通过 Burh ā n al-D ī n 于 1387 年去世后收集的一系列耶路撒冷宫廷文件了解了这位学者的图书馆。由于这些文件是在位于耶路撒冷 al-Ḥ aram al-Shar ī f 的伊斯兰博物馆中发现的,因此被称为 Ḥ aram 文件。这 950 份文件中的绝大部分与耶路撒冷一名 Sh ā fi ʿ ī 法官的任期有关,该法官被指控挪用虔诚捐赠基金的资金,并因此受到调查。唐纳德-利特尔(Donald Little)首先对这些资料进行了编目,此前,胡达-卢夫蒂(Huda Lufti)利用这些资料对十四世纪的耶路撒冷社会进行了研究,克里斯蒂安-穆勒(Christian Müller)利用这些资料对司法实践进行了研究。在这批文献中,有不少遗产清单,但 Burh ā n al-D ī n 图书馆的文献,包括作者称之为销售手册的大量清单,是独一无二的。作者指出,这是我们拥有详细文献资料的大叙利亚地区最早的图书馆。Burh ā n al-D ī n 是一个有趣的人物,正是因为他不为人知
Said Aljoumani and Konrad Hirschler: Owning Books and Preserving Documents in Medieval Jerusalem: The Library of Burhan al-Din (Edinburgh Studies in Classical Islamic History and Culture.) xii, 394 pp. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2023. ISBN 978 1 47449206 5.
The work under review is a valuable contribution to two burgeoning sub-fields in the history of the pre-modern Middle East: the history of the book and the history of archival practices. The authors have already made important contributions to these fields, including studies of the Damascus Ashraf ī ya madrasa library and the library of Ibn ʿ Abd al-H ā d ī , a fifteenth-century Damascene scholar. If the first study focused on a large institutional library and the second dealt with the library of a well-known scholar of Prophetic tradition ( ḥ ad ī th ), this third instalment in the trilogy is concerned with the library and estate of a minor scholar who lived in fourteenth-century Jerusalem. The library is known to us through a series of court documents from Jerusalem assembled after Burh ā n al-D ī n ’ s death in 1387. The documents in question form part of a corpus known as the Ḥ aram documents because they were discovered in the Islamic Museum located in al-Ḥ aram al-Shar ī f in Jerusalem. The vast majority of these 950 documents pertain to the tenure of one Sh ā fi ʿ ī judge in Jerusalem who was accused of misappropriating funds from pious endow-ments, leading to an investigation. They were first catalogued by Donald Little and previously utilized by Huda Lufti for a study of Jerusalem society in the fourteenth century and by Christian Müller to study judicial practice. There are quite a few estate inventories in this corpus of documents, but the documentation of Burh ā n al-D ī n ’ s library, including an extensive inventory that the authors call a sales booklet, is unique. The authors point out that this is the earliest library in Greater Syria for which we have detailed documentation. Burh ā n al-D ī n is an interesting figure precisely because he would otherwise be unknown