缅甸德林达依地区主权争议地区土地正规化实践中的相互合法性与有组织社会进程之间的关系

Asis Ammarapala, Peamsook Sanit
{"title":"缅甸德林达依地区主权争议地区土地正规化实践中的相互合法性与有组织社会进程之间的关系","authors":"Asis Ammarapala, Peamsook Sanit","doi":"10.54028/nj202322320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study considers the Dawei Special Economic Zone (DSEZ) project, which was a land formalization case in a sovereignty-contested area conducted by de jure Myanmar state, de facto Karen Nation Union (KNU), and an international developer. The DSEZ project planning comprised deep-sea Ports, 250 sq. kms of industrial estate zone, and the two-lane 148 km road linking Dawei in Myanmar and Kanchanaburi Province of Thailand as its main features. Recent studies of Myanmar land institutions in sovereignty-contested areas have mainly discussed the factor of \"inter-legality,\" the integration of non-state land laws, as the solution for land disputes between the central state and armed ethnic political groups. However, the real-world case in this study indicated a second factor, \"organized social processes,\" working in correspondence with the first factor. This research paper explores how the two factors were used together the integration of customary land practice into statutory property institutions, influencing changes in the structure and process of land formalization practices, and illustrates the unclear property institutions of sovereignty-contested frontiers. This research paper is a single case study that benefited from the researcher's five years of work experience in the DSEZ project's design, planning, and land acquisition. The obtained information comprises the project's land formalization documentation, published land laws which were checked with the project manager using the triangulation method, and local newspaper clippings. The study concludes that inter-legality and organized social processes should be used together in practice planning to form more context-oriented land formalization practices, employing collective community memory to reduce institutional inertia. Furthermore, the mutually-agreed standards can help avoid direct power contestation between the de jure and de facto.","PeriodicalId":502924,"journal":{"name":"Nakhara : Journal of Environmental Design and Planning","volume":"29 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship Between Inter-Legality and Organized Social Processes in Land Formalization Practices in The Sovereignty-Contested Area of Tanintharyi Region, Myanmar\",\"authors\":\"Asis Ammarapala, Peamsook Sanit\",\"doi\":\"10.54028/nj202322320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study considers the Dawei Special Economic Zone (DSEZ) project, which was a land formalization case in a sovereignty-contested area conducted by de jure Myanmar state, de facto Karen Nation Union (KNU), and an international developer. The DSEZ project planning comprised deep-sea Ports, 250 sq. kms of industrial estate zone, and the two-lane 148 km road linking Dawei in Myanmar and Kanchanaburi Province of Thailand as its main features. Recent studies of Myanmar land institutions in sovereignty-contested areas have mainly discussed the factor of \\\"inter-legality,\\\" the integration of non-state land laws, as the solution for land disputes between the central state and armed ethnic political groups. However, the real-world case in this study indicated a second factor, \\\"organized social processes,\\\" working in correspondence with the first factor. This research paper explores how the two factors were used together the integration of customary land practice into statutory property institutions, influencing changes in the structure and process of land formalization practices, and illustrates the unclear property institutions of sovereignty-contested frontiers. This research paper is a single case study that benefited from the researcher's five years of work experience in the DSEZ project's design, planning, and land acquisition. The obtained information comprises the project's land formalization documentation, published land laws which were checked with the project manager using the triangulation method, and local newspaper clippings. The study concludes that inter-legality and organized social processes should be used together in practice planning to form more context-oriented land formalization practices, employing collective community memory to reduce institutional inertia. Furthermore, the mutually-agreed standards can help avoid direct power contestation between the de jure and de facto.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nakhara : Journal of Environmental Design and Planning\",\"volume\":\"29 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nakhara : Journal of Environmental Design and Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54028/nj202322320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nakhara : Journal of Environmental Design and Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54028/nj202322320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考虑了土瓦经济特区(DSEZ)项目,该项目是由法律上的缅甸国、事实上的克伦民族联盟(KNU)和一家国际开发商在有主权争议的地区开展的土地正规化项目。DSEZ 项目规划的主要内容包括深海港口、250 平方公里的工业区以及连接缅甸土瓦和泰国甘差汶府的 148 公里双车道公路。近期对缅甸主权争议地区土地制度的研究主要讨论了 "法律间性 "因素,即整合非国家土地法,作为解决中央政府与少数民族武装政治团体之间土地纠纷的办法。然而,本研究中的现实案例表明了与第一个因素相对应的第二个因素,即 "有组织的社会进程"。本研究论文探讨了这两个因素如何共同作用于习惯土地实践与法定财产制度的融合,影响了土地正规化实践的结构和进程的变化,并说明了主权争议边界的财产制度的不明确性。本研究论文是一项单一案例研究,得益于研究者在 DSEZ 项目的设计、规划和土地征用方面五年的工作经验。获得的信息包括项目的土地正式化文件、已公布的土地法(使用三角测量法与项目经理进行了核对)以及当地剪报。研究得出的结论是,在实践规划中,应将法律间性和有组织的社会进程结合起来,形成更多面向具体情况的土地正规化实践,利用社区集体记忆来减少制度惯性。此外,共同商定的标准有助于避免法律上和事实上的直接权力争夺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Relationship Between Inter-Legality and Organized Social Processes in Land Formalization Practices in The Sovereignty-Contested Area of Tanintharyi Region, Myanmar
The study considers the Dawei Special Economic Zone (DSEZ) project, which was a land formalization case in a sovereignty-contested area conducted by de jure Myanmar state, de facto Karen Nation Union (KNU), and an international developer. The DSEZ project planning comprised deep-sea Ports, 250 sq. kms of industrial estate zone, and the two-lane 148 km road linking Dawei in Myanmar and Kanchanaburi Province of Thailand as its main features. Recent studies of Myanmar land institutions in sovereignty-contested areas have mainly discussed the factor of "inter-legality," the integration of non-state land laws, as the solution for land disputes between the central state and armed ethnic political groups. However, the real-world case in this study indicated a second factor, "organized social processes," working in correspondence with the first factor. This research paper explores how the two factors were used together the integration of customary land practice into statutory property institutions, influencing changes in the structure and process of land formalization practices, and illustrates the unclear property institutions of sovereignty-contested frontiers. This research paper is a single case study that benefited from the researcher's five years of work experience in the DSEZ project's design, planning, and land acquisition. The obtained information comprises the project's land formalization documentation, published land laws which were checked with the project manager using the triangulation method, and local newspaper clippings. The study concludes that inter-legality and organized social processes should be used together in practice planning to form more context-oriented land formalization practices, employing collective community memory to reduce institutional inertia. Furthermore, the mutually-agreed standards can help avoid direct power contestation between the de jure and de facto.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信