使用流化床干燥机和托盘干燥机干燥香料叶片的特性

Tjahja Muhandri, F. M. Taqi, Subarna Subarna, Dian Widiawati
{"title":"使用流化床干燥机和托盘干燥机干燥香料叶片的特性","authors":"Tjahja Muhandri, F. M. Taqi, Subarna Subarna, Dian Widiawati","doi":"10.6066/jtip.2023.34.2.187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bay leaves (Sygygium polyanthum), kaffir lime leaves (Citrus hystrix) and pandan leaves (Pandanus amaryllifolius) are herb leaves with unique aroma that are often added to dishes to strengthen and enrich the taste. The high demand of the leaves has prompted efforts to make them easy to distribute and shelf stable. Drying can increase the shelf life of these leaves with acceptable quality. The objectives of the research were to determine drying models for these leaves using two types of driers and to determine the panelist's preference for the dried and rehydrated leaves. These herb leaves are fresh-picked from the tree, cleaned and dried using the two different driers, i.e. fluidized bed drier (temperature 40-42°C) and tray drier (temperature 58-61°C). The leaves were weighed every 15 minutes until they reached a constant weight. Fresh leaves and dry leaves were photographed. The drying kinetics of both types of driers were checked with the Lewis model and Page model. Panelist preference test was carried out on dry leaves and leaves that had been rehydrated using hot water. The results showed that drying with a tray drier was able to dry faster than that with a fluidized bed drier. The Page drying model is more suitable to describe the drying conditions than the Lewis drying model. Panelists preferred dry and rehydrated herb leaves obtained from fluidized bed drying.","PeriodicalId":17790,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Teknologi dan Industri Pangan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Karakteristik Pengeringan Rempah Daun Menggunakan Fluidized Bed Drier dan Tray Drier\",\"authors\":\"Tjahja Muhandri, F. M. Taqi, Subarna Subarna, Dian Widiawati\",\"doi\":\"10.6066/jtip.2023.34.2.187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bay leaves (Sygygium polyanthum), kaffir lime leaves (Citrus hystrix) and pandan leaves (Pandanus amaryllifolius) are herb leaves with unique aroma that are often added to dishes to strengthen and enrich the taste. The high demand of the leaves has prompted efforts to make them easy to distribute and shelf stable. Drying can increase the shelf life of these leaves with acceptable quality. The objectives of the research were to determine drying models for these leaves using two types of driers and to determine the panelist's preference for the dried and rehydrated leaves. These herb leaves are fresh-picked from the tree, cleaned and dried using the two different driers, i.e. fluidized bed drier (temperature 40-42°C) and tray drier (temperature 58-61°C). The leaves were weighed every 15 minutes until they reached a constant weight. Fresh leaves and dry leaves were photographed. The drying kinetics of both types of driers were checked with the Lewis model and Page model. Panelist preference test was carried out on dry leaves and leaves that had been rehydrated using hot water. The results showed that drying with a tray drier was able to dry faster than that with a fluidized bed drier. The Page drying model is more suitable to describe the drying conditions than the Lewis drying model. Panelists preferred dry and rehydrated herb leaves obtained from fluidized bed drying.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Teknologi dan Industri Pangan\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Teknologi dan Industri Pangan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6066/jtip.2023.34.2.187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Teknologi dan Industri Pangan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6066/jtip.2023.34.2.187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

贝叶(Sygygium polyanthum)、水柠檬叶(Citrus hystrix)和蒲公英叶(Pandanus amaryllifolius)是具有独特香味的草本植物叶,经常被添加到菜肴中,以增强和丰富菜肴的味道。对这些叶子的大量需求促使人们努力使其易于分发和在货架上保持稳定。干燥可以在保证质量的前提下延长这些叶子的货架期。这项研究的目的是确定使用两种干燥机对这些叶子进行干燥的模式,并确定小组成员对干燥和再水化叶子的偏好。这些草本植物的叶子是从树上新鲜采摘下来的,清洗干净后使用两种不同的干燥机进行干燥,即流化床干燥机(温度 40-42°C)和托盘干燥机(温度 58-61°C)。每隔 15 分钟对树叶称重一次,直至达到恒定重量。对鲜叶和干叶进行拍照。用 Lewis 模型和 Page 模型检验了两种干燥机的干燥动力学。对干叶和用热水复水的叶片进行了小组偏好测试。结果表明,使用托盘干燥机干燥比使用流化床干燥机干燥更快。Page 干燥模型比 Lewis 干燥模型更适合描述干燥条件。专家小组成员更喜欢流化床干燥获得的干燥和再水化草本植物叶片。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Karakteristik Pengeringan Rempah Daun Menggunakan Fluidized Bed Drier dan Tray Drier
Bay leaves (Sygygium polyanthum), kaffir lime leaves (Citrus hystrix) and pandan leaves (Pandanus amaryllifolius) are herb leaves with unique aroma that are often added to dishes to strengthen and enrich the taste. The high demand of the leaves has prompted efforts to make them easy to distribute and shelf stable. Drying can increase the shelf life of these leaves with acceptable quality. The objectives of the research were to determine drying models for these leaves using two types of driers and to determine the panelist's preference for the dried and rehydrated leaves. These herb leaves are fresh-picked from the tree, cleaned and dried using the two different driers, i.e. fluidized bed drier (temperature 40-42°C) and tray drier (temperature 58-61°C). The leaves were weighed every 15 minutes until they reached a constant weight. Fresh leaves and dry leaves were photographed. The drying kinetics of both types of driers were checked with the Lewis model and Page model. Panelist preference test was carried out on dry leaves and leaves that had been rehydrated using hot water. The results showed that drying with a tray drier was able to dry faster than that with a fluidized bed drier. The Page drying model is more suitable to describe the drying conditions than the Lewis drying model. Panelists preferred dry and rehydrated herb leaves obtained from fluidized bed drying.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信