{"title":"第 2500 号意见（第 3790 号案件）--建议复审第 2404 号意见并重新审议第 3633 号案件：Dysactis pallida Agassiz in Verrill, 1864（目前为 Exaiptasia pallida；Cnidaria, Anthozoa, Hexacorallia, Actiniaria）：建议优先于 Exaiptasia diaphana (Rapp, 1829) 未获批准","authors":"","doi":"10.21805/bzn.v80.a029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature has declined to use its plenary power to reverse Opinion 2404 regarding Case 3633 which would have resulted in giving priority to the species-group name Dysactis pallida Agassiz in Verrill, 1864 (currently Exaiptasia pallida) over Dysactis diaphana Rapp, 1829 (currently Exaiptasia diaphana). As a result, the Ruling given in Opinion 2404 stands and the species-group name pallida Agassiz in Verrill, 1864, as published in the binomen Dysactis pallida, will not be given precedence over the species-group name diaphana Rapp, 1829, as published in the binomen Actinia diaphana, whenever the two are considered synonyms.","PeriodicalId":22414,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opinion 2500 (Case 3790) – Proposed review of Opinion 2404 and reconsideration of Case 3633: Dysactis pallida Agassiz in Verrill, 1864 (currently Exaiptasia pallida; Cnidaria, Anthozoa, Hexacorallia, Actiniaria): proposed precedence over Exaiptasia diaphana (Rapp, 1829) not approved\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.21805/bzn.v80.a029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature has declined to use its plenary power to reverse Opinion 2404 regarding Case 3633 which would have resulted in giving priority to the species-group name Dysactis pallida Agassiz in Verrill, 1864 (currently Exaiptasia pallida) over Dysactis diaphana Rapp, 1829 (currently Exaiptasia diaphana). As a result, the Ruling given in Opinion 2404 stands and the species-group name pallida Agassiz in Verrill, 1864, as published in the binomen Dysactis pallida, will not be given precedence over the species-group name diaphana Rapp, 1829, as published in the binomen Actinia diaphana, whenever the two are considered synonyms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v80.a029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v80.a029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Opinion 2500 (Case 3790) – Proposed review of Opinion 2404 and reconsideration of Case 3633: Dysactis pallida Agassiz in Verrill, 1864 (currently Exaiptasia pallida; Cnidaria, Anthozoa, Hexacorallia, Actiniaria): proposed precedence over Exaiptasia diaphana (Rapp, 1829) not approved
Abstract. The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature has declined to use its plenary power to reverse Opinion 2404 regarding Case 3633 which would have resulted in giving priority to the species-group name Dysactis pallida Agassiz in Verrill, 1864 (currently Exaiptasia pallida) over Dysactis diaphana Rapp, 1829 (currently Exaiptasia diaphana). As a result, the Ruling given in Opinion 2404 stands and the species-group name pallida Agassiz in Verrill, 1864, as published in the binomen Dysactis pallida, will not be given precedence over the species-group name diaphana Rapp, 1829, as published in the binomen Actinia diaphana, whenever the two are considered synonyms.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
