在适用的国际法和协议中证明电子仲裁协议的问题

IF 1.1 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Muawya Naser Al Dalaien, Ziad Al Enizi, Ahmad Al Dalaien
{"title":"在适用的国际法和协议中证明电子仲裁协议的问题","authors":"Muawya Naser Al Dalaien, Ziad Al Enizi, Ahmad Al Dalaien","doi":"10.1080/19361610.2021.1964324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Abstract</b></p><p>This research deals with the legal problems faced by the proof of the electronic arbitration agreement in the national laws. The research ended with important results, one of them is at the level of national legislation, that some national legislations require the use of public-key technology in order for the electronic arbitration agreement to have evidentiary value, and other legislations do not require the use of a specific technology. The study concluded that the best solution at the international level is to make amendments to the New York Convention.</p>","PeriodicalId":44585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Security Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problems of Proving the Electronic Arbitration Agreement in Applicable International Laws and Agreements\",\"authors\":\"Muawya Naser Al Dalaien, Ziad Al Enizi, Ahmad Al Dalaien\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19361610.2021.1964324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Abstract</b></p><p>This research deals with the legal problems faced by the proof of the electronic arbitration agreement in the national laws. The research ended with important results, one of them is at the level of national legislation, that some national legislations require the use of public-key technology in order for the electronic arbitration agreement to have evidentiary value, and other legislations do not require the use of a specific technology. The study concluded that the best solution at the international level is to make amendments to the New York Convention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Security Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Security Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2021.1964324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Security Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2021.1964324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 本研究涉及各国法律中电子仲裁协议的证明所面临的法律问题。研究得出了重要结果,其中之一是在国家立法层面,一些国家立法要求使用公钥技术才能使电子仲裁协议具有证据价值,而另一些国家立法则不要求使用特定技术。研究得出的结论是,国际层面的最佳解决方案是对《纽约公约》进行修订。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Problems of Proving the Electronic Arbitration Agreement in Applicable International Laws and Agreements

Abstract

This research deals with the legal problems faced by the proof of the electronic arbitration agreement in the national laws. The research ended with important results, one of them is at the level of national legislation, that some national legislations require the use of public-key technology in order for the electronic arbitration agreement to have evidentiary value, and other legislations do not require the use of a specific technology. The study concluded that the best solution at the international level is to make amendments to the New York Convention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Security Research
Journal of Applied Security Research CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信