黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结:最佳治疗的必要条件。

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-02 DOI:10.1007/s10585-023-10254-2
Mark B Faries
{"title":"黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结:最佳治疗的必要条件。","authors":"Mark B Faries","doi":"10.1007/s10585-023-10254-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lymphatic metastasis is the dominant route of initial spread for most solid tumors. For many such malignancies, including melanomas, surgical treatment previously included removal of all potentially draining regional lymph nodes (elective node dissection). The advent of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy allowed accurate pathologic assessment of the metastatic status of regional nodes and spared patients full dissection if their SLN was clear. In melanoma, recent clinical research has demonstrated that complete lymph node dissection is not clinically beneficial, even for patients with sentinel node metastases and that patients with high-risk primary melanomas benefit from adjuvant systemic immunotherapy, even without nodal disease. These two changes in the standard of care have led to some interest in abandoning surgical nodal staging via the sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure. However, this appears to be premature and potentially detrimental to optimal patient management. The ongoing value of sentinel node biopsy stems from its ability to provide critically important prognostic information as well as durable regional nodal disease control for most patients with nodal metastases, even in the absence of complete dissection of the basin. It also provides an opportunity to identify novel prognostic and predictive immunologic and molecular biomarkers. While it is certainly possible that additional changes in melanoma therapy will make sentinel lymph node biopsy obsolete in the future, at present it remains a minimally invasive, low morbidity means of improving both staging and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10267,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis","volume":" ","pages":"369-374"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11374908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma: necessary as ever for optimal treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Mark B Faries\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10585-023-10254-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lymphatic metastasis is the dominant route of initial spread for most solid tumors. For many such malignancies, including melanomas, surgical treatment previously included removal of all potentially draining regional lymph nodes (elective node dissection). The advent of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy allowed accurate pathologic assessment of the metastatic status of regional nodes and spared patients full dissection if their SLN was clear. In melanoma, recent clinical research has demonstrated that complete lymph node dissection is not clinically beneficial, even for patients with sentinel node metastases and that patients with high-risk primary melanomas benefit from adjuvant systemic immunotherapy, even without nodal disease. These two changes in the standard of care have led to some interest in abandoning surgical nodal staging via the sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure. However, this appears to be premature and potentially detrimental to optimal patient management. The ongoing value of sentinel node biopsy stems from its ability to provide critically important prognostic information as well as durable regional nodal disease control for most patients with nodal metastases, even in the absence of complete dissection of the basin. It also provides an opportunity to identify novel prognostic and predictive immunologic and molecular biomarkers. While it is certainly possible that additional changes in melanoma therapy will make sentinel lymph node biopsy obsolete in the future, at present it remains a minimally invasive, low morbidity means of improving both staging and outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"369-374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11374908/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-023-10254-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-023-10254-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

淋巴转移是大多数实体瘤最初扩散的主要途径。对于包括黑色素瘤在内的许多此类恶性肿瘤,以前的手术治疗包括切除所有可能引流的区域淋巴结(选择性淋巴结清扫术)。淋巴图谱和前哨淋巴结(SLN)活检技术的出现使病理学家能够准确评估区域淋巴结的转移状态,如果前哨淋巴结清晰,患者就不必进行全面清扫。最近的临床研究表明,对于黑色素瘤患者来说,即使有前哨淋巴结转移,完全的淋巴结清扫也不会给临床带来益处,而且即使没有结节病,高危原发性黑色素瘤患者也能从辅助性全身免疫疗法中获益。这两项治疗标准的改变使一些人开始考虑放弃通过前哨淋巴结活检术进行手术结节分期。然而,这种想法似乎还为时过早,而且可能不利于患者的最佳治疗。前哨淋巴结活检的持续价值在于它能够为大多数结节转移患者提供至关重要的预后信息和持久的区域结节疾病控制,即使在没有完全解剖盆腔的情况下也是如此。它还为确定新的预后和预测性免疫及分子生物标记物提供了机会。虽然黑色素瘤治疗方法的进一步改变肯定会使前哨淋巴结活检在未来过时,但目前它仍然是一种微创、低发病率的分期和预后改善手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma: necessary as ever for optimal treatment.

Lymphatic metastasis is the dominant route of initial spread for most solid tumors. For many such malignancies, including melanomas, surgical treatment previously included removal of all potentially draining regional lymph nodes (elective node dissection). The advent of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy allowed accurate pathologic assessment of the metastatic status of regional nodes and spared patients full dissection if their SLN was clear. In melanoma, recent clinical research has demonstrated that complete lymph node dissection is not clinically beneficial, even for patients with sentinel node metastases and that patients with high-risk primary melanomas benefit from adjuvant systemic immunotherapy, even without nodal disease. These two changes in the standard of care have led to some interest in abandoning surgical nodal staging via the sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure. However, this appears to be premature and potentially detrimental to optimal patient management. The ongoing value of sentinel node biopsy stems from its ability to provide critically important prognostic information as well as durable regional nodal disease control for most patients with nodal metastases, even in the absence of complete dissection of the basin. It also provides an opportunity to identify novel prognostic and predictive immunologic and molecular biomarkers. While it is certainly possible that additional changes in melanoma therapy will make sentinel lymph node biopsy obsolete in the future, at present it remains a minimally invasive, low morbidity means of improving both staging and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal''s scope encompasses all aspects of metastasis research, whether laboratory-based, experimental or clinical and therapeutic. It covers such areas as molecular biology, pharmacology, tumor biology, and clinical cancer treatment (with all its subdivisions of surgery, chemotherapy and radio-therapy as well as pathology and epidemiology) insofar as these disciplines are concerned with the Journal''s core subject of metastasis formation, prevention and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信