从保险理赔数据中定义、衡量和评估产前护理

3区 医学
Elizabeth Simmons, Mekhala V. Dissanayake, Jacob C. Kahrs, Chase D. Latour, Oluwasolape Olawore, Lauren M. Kucirka, Mollie E. Wood
{"title":"从保险理赔数据中定义、衡量和评估产前护理","authors":"Elizabeth Simmons, Mekhala V. Dissanayake, Jacob C. Kahrs, Chase D. Latour, Oluwasolape Olawore, Lauren M. Kucirka, Mollie E. Wood","doi":"10.1007/s40471-023-00341-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>The objective of this paper is to discuss the complexities of identifying prenatal care visits in insurance claims databases, review existing methods to identify prenatal care encounters, and explore how different study goals should inform the definition of prenatal care employed by investigators.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent Findings</h3><p>Insurance claims data are routinely used to conduct perinatal epidemiology studies focused on the effects of medical interventions. Prenatal care, an important medical intervention and an indicator of ongoing pregnancy, lacks a consistent definition among clinical and research-based sources.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>We have categorized definitions of prenatal care in three groups: all healthcare received while pregnant, pregnancy-specific healthcare, and guideline-concordant healthcare. In studies using insurance claims data, we found five common methods to identify prenatal care encounters. Using example study goals, we outline important considerations investigators must make when applying different methods to identify prenatal care visits in studies using insurance claims data.</p>","PeriodicalId":48527,"journal":{"name":"Current Epidemiology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining, Measuring, and Evaluating Prenatal Care in Insurance Claims Data\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Simmons, Mekhala V. Dissanayake, Jacob C. Kahrs, Chase D. Latour, Oluwasolape Olawore, Lauren M. Kucirka, Mollie E. Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40471-023-00341-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>The objective of this paper is to discuss the complexities of identifying prenatal care visits in insurance claims databases, review existing methods to identify prenatal care encounters, and explore how different study goals should inform the definition of prenatal care employed by investigators.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Recent Findings</h3><p>Insurance claims data are routinely used to conduct perinatal epidemiology studies focused on the effects of medical interventions. Prenatal care, an important medical intervention and an indicator of ongoing pregnancy, lacks a consistent definition among clinical and research-based sources.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Summary</h3><p>We have categorized definitions of prenatal care in three groups: all healthcare received while pregnant, pregnancy-specific healthcare, and guideline-concordant healthcare. In studies using insurance claims data, we found five common methods to identify prenatal care encounters. Using example study goals, we outline important considerations investigators must make when applying different methods to identify prenatal care visits in studies using insurance claims data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Epidemiology Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Epidemiology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-023-00341-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Epidemiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-023-00341-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在讨论在保险理赔数据库中识别产前护理就诊的复杂性,回顾识别产前护理就诊的现有方法,并探讨不同的研究目标应如何影响调查人员对产前护理的定义。产前护理是一项重要的医疗干预措施,也是正在进行的妊娠的指标之一,但在临床和研究来源中缺乏一致的定义。摘要我们将产前护理的定义分为三类:怀孕期间接受的所有医疗护理、妊娠特定医疗护理和与指南一致的医疗护理。在使用保险理赔数据的研究中,我们发现了五种常见的产前护理识别方法。通过研究目标示例,我们概述了调查人员在使用保险理赔数据的研究中采用不同方法识别产前护理就诊时必须注意的重要事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Defining, Measuring, and Evaluating Prenatal Care in Insurance Claims Data

Defining, Measuring, and Evaluating Prenatal Care in Insurance Claims Data

Purpose of Review

The objective of this paper is to discuss the complexities of identifying prenatal care visits in insurance claims databases, review existing methods to identify prenatal care encounters, and explore how different study goals should inform the definition of prenatal care employed by investigators.

Recent Findings

Insurance claims data are routinely used to conduct perinatal epidemiology studies focused on the effects of medical interventions. Prenatal care, an important medical intervention and an indicator of ongoing pregnancy, lacks a consistent definition among clinical and research-based sources.

Summary

We have categorized definitions of prenatal care in three groups: all healthcare received while pregnant, pregnancy-specific healthcare, and guideline-concordant healthcare. In studies using insurance claims data, we found five common methods to identify prenatal care encounters. Using example study goals, we outline important considerations investigators must make when applying different methods to identify prenatal care visits in studies using insurance claims data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Epidemiology Reports
Current Epidemiology Reports OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信