在社区居住的老年缅因人中,病人对开药的态度。

Q2 Medicine
Joshua Carver, Sydney P Springer
{"title":"在社区居住的老年缅因人中,病人对开药的态度。","authors":"Joshua Carver, Sydney P Springer","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2024.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> The excess use of medications has become an increasingly prevalent issue in health care. Deprescribing can be an important tool in combating polypharmacy. <b>Objective</b> To assess the attitudes of community-dwelling older persons in Maine toward their medications and the concept of deprescription. An additional aim of this research was to assess the association between the revised Patient Attitudes Toward Deprescribing Questionnaire (rPATDQ) domains by polypharmacy status. <b>Methods</b> Researchers conducted a cross-sectional study utilizing the rPATDQ. Authors recruited older Mainers via a longitudinal cohort study through the University of New England Center for Excellence in Aging in Health. Respondents were stratified by polypharmacy status (fewer than five medications, five or more medications). <b>Results</b> Total daily medications ranged from 1 to 30 (average of 8.6). Overall, 83.6% of respondents agreed/strongly agreed to the statement \"If my doctor said it was possible, I would be willing to stop one or more of my regular medicines.\" 70.6% agreed/ strongly agreed to the statement \"Overall, I am satisfied with my current medicines.\" Those with and without polypharmacy experienced low overall medication burden and a high belief in the appropriateness of their medications. There were no statistically significant differences between polypharmacy groups. <b>Conclusion</b> The results of this survey indicate that the factors affecting attitudes toward deprescribing are complex. While many indicated willingness to deprescribe at least one medication, there was a high degree of satisfaction with current medication regimens. This study highlights the need for further qualitative research to identify potential barriers to deprescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"39 1","pages":"30-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Attitudes Toward Deprescribing Among Community-Dwelling Older Mainers.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Carver, Sydney P Springer\",\"doi\":\"10.4140/TCP.n.2024.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b> The excess use of medications has become an increasingly prevalent issue in health care. Deprescribing can be an important tool in combating polypharmacy. <b>Objective</b> To assess the attitudes of community-dwelling older persons in Maine toward their medications and the concept of deprescription. An additional aim of this research was to assess the association between the revised Patient Attitudes Toward Deprescribing Questionnaire (rPATDQ) domains by polypharmacy status. <b>Methods</b> Researchers conducted a cross-sectional study utilizing the rPATDQ. Authors recruited older Mainers via a longitudinal cohort study through the University of New England Center for Excellence in Aging in Health. Respondents were stratified by polypharmacy status (fewer than five medications, five or more medications). <b>Results</b> Total daily medications ranged from 1 to 30 (average of 8.6). Overall, 83.6% of respondents agreed/strongly agreed to the statement \\\"If my doctor said it was possible, I would be willing to stop one or more of my regular medicines.\\\" 70.6% agreed/ strongly agreed to the statement \\\"Overall, I am satisfied with my current medicines.\\\" Those with and without polypharmacy experienced low overall medication burden and a high belief in the appropriateness of their medications. There were no statistically significant differences between polypharmacy groups. <b>Conclusion</b> The results of this survey indicate that the factors affecting attitudes toward deprescribing are complex. While many indicated willingness to deprescribe at least one medication, there was a high degree of satisfaction with current medication regimens. This study highlights the need for further qualitative research to identify potential barriers to deprescribing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Senior Care Pharmacist\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"30-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Senior Care Pharmacist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2024.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Senior Care Pharmacist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2024.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 过度用药已成为医疗保健领域日益普遍的问题。去处方化可能是对抗多药滥用的一个重要工具。目标 评估缅因州社区老年人对药物的态度以及去处方化的概念。本研究的另一个目的是评估修订后的 "患者对去处方化的态度调查问卷"(rPATDQ)各领域与多重用药状况之间的关联。方法 研究人员利用 rPATDQ 进行了一项横断面研究。作者通过新英格兰大学健康老龄化卓越中心的一项纵向队列研究招募了缅因州的老年人。根据多药状态(少于五种药物、五种或五种以上药物)对受访者进行了分层。结果 每天服用的药物总量从 1 种到 30 种不等(平均为 8.6 种)。总体而言,83.6% 的受访者同意/非常同意 "如果医生说有可能,我愿意停用一种或多种常规药物 "这一说法。70.6%的受访者同意/非常同意 "总体而言,我对目前的药物感到满意"。使用多种药物和未使用多种药物的患者的总体用药负担较轻,并且非常相信药物的适当性。多药治疗组之间在统计学上没有明显差异。结论 本次调查的结果表明,影响人们对去处方化态度的因素非常复杂。虽然许多人表示愿意取消至少一种药物的处方,但他们对目前的用药方案非常满意。这项研究强调了进一步开展定性研究的必要性,以确定取消处方的潜在障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Attitudes Toward Deprescribing Among Community-Dwelling Older Mainers.

Background The excess use of medications has become an increasingly prevalent issue in health care. Deprescribing can be an important tool in combating polypharmacy. Objective To assess the attitudes of community-dwelling older persons in Maine toward their medications and the concept of deprescription. An additional aim of this research was to assess the association between the revised Patient Attitudes Toward Deprescribing Questionnaire (rPATDQ) domains by polypharmacy status. Methods Researchers conducted a cross-sectional study utilizing the rPATDQ. Authors recruited older Mainers via a longitudinal cohort study through the University of New England Center for Excellence in Aging in Health. Respondents were stratified by polypharmacy status (fewer than five medications, five or more medications). Results Total daily medications ranged from 1 to 30 (average of 8.6). Overall, 83.6% of respondents agreed/strongly agreed to the statement "If my doctor said it was possible, I would be willing to stop one or more of my regular medicines." 70.6% agreed/ strongly agreed to the statement "Overall, I am satisfied with my current medicines." Those with and without polypharmacy experienced low overall medication burden and a high belief in the appropriateness of their medications. There were no statistically significant differences between polypharmacy groups. Conclusion The results of this survey indicate that the factors affecting attitudes toward deprescribing are complex. While many indicated willingness to deprescribe at least one medication, there was a high degree of satisfaction with current medication regimens. This study highlights the need for further qualitative research to identify potential barriers to deprescribing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Senior Care Pharmacist
Senior Care Pharmacist PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信