在普通人群中测量自闭症相关特征:社会沟通问卷的因子结构和跨性别及诊断状态的测量不变性。

IF 5.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Autism Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-30 DOI:10.1177/13623613231219306
Laura Hegemann, Ragna Bugge Askeland, Stian Barbo Valand, Anne-Siri Øyen, Synnve Schjølberg, Vanessa H Bal, Somer L Bishop, Camilla Stoltenberg, Tilmann von Soest, Laurie J Hannigan, Alexandra Havdahl
{"title":"在普通人群中测量自闭症相关特征:社会沟通问卷的因子结构和跨性别及诊断状态的测量不变性。","authors":"Laura Hegemann, Ragna Bugge Askeland, Stian Barbo Valand, Anne-Siri Øyen, Synnve Schjølberg, Vanessa H Bal, Somer L Bishop, Camilla Stoltenberg, Tilmann von Soest, Laurie J Hannigan, Alexandra Havdahl","doi":"10.1177/13623613231219306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Lay abstract: </strong>Using questionnaires in research relies on the expectation that they measure the same things across different groups of individuals. If this is not true, then interpretations of results can be misleading when researchers compare responses across different groups of individuals or use in it a group that differs from that in which the questionnaire was developed. For the questionnaire we investigated, the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ), we found that parents of boys and girls responded to questionnaire items in largely the same way but that the SCQ measured traits and behaviors slightly differently depending on whether the children had autism. Based on these results, we concluded that researchers using this questionnaire should carefully consider these differences when deciding how to interpret findings. SCQ scores as a reflection of \"autism-associated traits\" in samples that are mostly or entirely made up of individuals without an autism diagnosis may be misleading and we encourage a more precise interpretation of scores as a broader indication of social-communicative and behavioral traits.</p>","PeriodicalId":8724,"journal":{"name":"Autism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11360277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring autism-associated traits in the general population: Factor structure and measurement invariance across sex and diagnosis status of the Social Communication Questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Hegemann, Ragna Bugge Askeland, Stian Barbo Valand, Anne-Siri Øyen, Synnve Schjølberg, Vanessa H Bal, Somer L Bishop, Camilla Stoltenberg, Tilmann von Soest, Laurie J Hannigan, Alexandra Havdahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13623613231219306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Lay abstract: </strong>Using questionnaires in research relies on the expectation that they measure the same things across different groups of individuals. If this is not true, then interpretations of results can be misleading when researchers compare responses across different groups of individuals or use in it a group that differs from that in which the questionnaire was developed. For the questionnaire we investigated, the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ), we found that parents of boys and girls responded to questionnaire items in largely the same way but that the SCQ measured traits and behaviors slightly differently depending on whether the children had autism. Based on these results, we concluded that researchers using this questionnaire should carefully consider these differences when deciding how to interpret findings. SCQ scores as a reflection of \\\"autism-associated traits\\\" in samples that are mostly or entirely made up of individuals without an autism diagnosis may be misleading and we encourage a more precise interpretation of scores as a broader indication of social-communicative and behavioral traits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11360277/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613231219306\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613231219306","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内容提要:在研究中使用问卷是基于这样一种期望,即在不同的人群中,问卷所测量的内容是相同的。如果事实并非如此,那么当研究人员比较不同群体的回答,或在其中使用与问卷编制群体不同的群体时,对结果的解释就会产生误导。对于我们调查的问卷--社会交流问卷(Social Communication Questionnaire,SCQ),我们发现男孩和女孩的父母对问卷项目的回答基本相同,但根据孩子是否患有自闭症,SCQ 所测量的特征和行为略有不同。基于这些结果,我们得出结论,使用该问卷的研究人员在决定如何解释研究结果时,应仔细考虑这些差异。在大部分或全部由未被诊断为自闭症的个体组成的样本中,将 SCQ 分数作为 "自闭症相关特征 "的反映可能会产生误导,我们鼓励将分数更精确地解释为社会交往和行为特征的更广泛指示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring autism-associated traits in the general population: Factor structure and measurement invariance across sex and diagnosis status of the Social Communication Questionnaire.

Lay abstract: Using questionnaires in research relies on the expectation that they measure the same things across different groups of individuals. If this is not true, then interpretations of results can be misleading when researchers compare responses across different groups of individuals or use in it a group that differs from that in which the questionnaire was developed. For the questionnaire we investigated, the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ), we found that parents of boys and girls responded to questionnaire items in largely the same way but that the SCQ measured traits and behaviors slightly differently depending on whether the children had autism. Based on these results, we concluded that researchers using this questionnaire should carefully consider these differences when deciding how to interpret findings. SCQ scores as a reflection of "autism-associated traits" in samples that are mostly or entirely made up of individuals without an autism diagnosis may be misleading and we encourage a more precise interpretation of scores as a broader indication of social-communicative and behavioral traits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Autism
Autism PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
11.50%
发文量
160
期刊介绍: Autism is a major, peer-reviewed, international journal, published 8 times a year, publishing research of direct and practical relevance to help improve the quality of life for individuals with autism or autism-related disorders. It is interdisciplinary in nature, focusing on research in many areas, including: intervention; diagnosis; training; education; translational issues related to neuroscience, medical and genetic issues of practical import; psychological processes; evaluation of particular therapies; quality of life; family needs; and epidemiological research. Autism provides a major international forum for peer-reviewed research of direct and practical relevance to improving the quality of life for individuals with autism or autism-related disorders. The journal''s success and popularity reflect the recent worldwide growth in the research and understanding of autistic spectrum disorders, and the consequent impact on the provision of treatment and care. Autism is interdisciplinary in nature, focusing on evaluative research in all areas, including: intervention, diagnosis, training, education, neuroscience, psychological processes, evaluation of particular therapies, quality of life issues, family issues and family services, medical and genetic issues, epidemiological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信