民主的延续还是倒退?克罗地亚后欧盟时代的政治轨迹

IF 0.4 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Davor Pauković, Višeslav Raos
{"title":"民主的延续还是倒退?克罗地亚后欧盟时代的政治轨迹","authors":"Davor Pauković, Višeslav Raos","doi":"10.30965/18763332-47020002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article deals with the level of democracy in Croatia after EU accession. The first part presents key events, processes, and actors which have shaped the trajectory of democratic development. The second part discusses the Croatian case in the context of current research on democratic backsliding. The third part tests the idea about democratic backsliding in Croatia by running regression models with democracy indices derived from the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) dataset. The findings challenge the idea of democratic backsliding in Croatia. The models do not show a clear association of decreased democracy scores after EU accession but point to a stronger role of the pre-accession period in increasing levels of democracy in Croatia. The models also highlight the explanatory role of executive and public sector corruption regarding democracy levels in Croatia. Instead of speaking of democratic backsliding, the Croatian case can be better described as one experiencing democratic stagnation.</p>","PeriodicalId":43126,"journal":{"name":"SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Democratic Continuity or Regression?: Croatia’s Post-EU Political Trajectory\",\"authors\":\"Davor Pauković, Višeslav Raos\",\"doi\":\"10.30965/18763332-47020002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article deals with the level of democracy in Croatia after EU accession. The first part presents key events, processes, and actors which have shaped the trajectory of democratic development. The second part discusses the Croatian case in the context of current research on democratic backsliding. The third part tests the idea about democratic backsliding in Croatia by running regression models with democracy indices derived from the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) dataset. The findings challenge the idea of democratic backsliding in Croatia. The models do not show a clear association of decreased democracy scores after EU accession but point to a stronger role of the pre-accession period in increasing levels of democracy in Croatia. The models also highlight the explanatory role of executive and public sector corruption regarding democracy levels in Croatia. Instead of speaking of democratic backsliding, the Croatian case can be better described as one experiencing democratic stagnation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30965/18763332-47020002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/18763332-47020002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文论述了克罗地亚加入欧盟后的民主水平。第一部分介绍了影响民主发展轨迹的关键事件、进程和参与者。第二部分结合当前关于民主倒退的研究,讨论了克罗地亚的情况。第三部分通过使用从 "民主多样性"(V-Dem)数据集中得出的民主指数运行回归模型,检验克罗地亚民主倒退的观点。研究结果对克罗地亚民主倒退的观点提出了质疑。模型并未显示加入欧盟后民主指数下降的明显关联,而是指出加入欧盟前的时期在提高克罗地亚民主水平方面发挥了更大的作用。这些模型还强调了行政和公共部门腐败对克罗地亚民主水平的解释作用。与其说克罗地亚出现了民主倒退,不如说它经历了民主停滞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Democratic Continuity or Regression?: Croatia’s Post-EU Political Trajectory

This article deals with the level of democracy in Croatia after EU accession. The first part presents key events, processes, and actors which have shaped the trajectory of democratic development. The second part discusses the Croatian case in the context of current research on democratic backsliding. The third part tests the idea about democratic backsliding in Croatia by running regression models with democracy indices derived from the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) dataset. The findings challenge the idea of democratic backsliding in Croatia. The models do not show a clear association of decreased democracy scores after EU accession but point to a stronger role of the pre-accession period in increasing levels of democracy in Croatia. The models also highlight the explanatory role of executive and public sector corruption regarding democracy levels in Croatia. Instead of speaking of democratic backsliding, the Croatian case can be better described as one experiencing democratic stagnation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE
SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信