WingKwan Michelle Kwok, Helen Bourke-Taylor, Stuart Carey, Maria McKenzie
{"title":"自闭症儿童作业疗法观察工具--调整支持细节：内容有效性和临床实用性调查。","authors":"WingKwan Michelle Kwok, Helen Bourke-Taylor, Stuart Carey, Maria McKenzie","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.12924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Standardised testing is crucial for autistic children to receive appropriate interventions, necessary services, and funding. Behaviours associated with autism can hinder children's test performance and participation. The 18-item, two-page Occupational Therapy Observation Tool–Adjustment Support Details (OTOT-ASD) is used in conjunction with standardised assessments. The OTOT-ASD enables the recording of autism-related behaviours and the reasonable assessment accommodations made to support participation in testing. The current study aims to investigate the content validity and clinical utility of the OTOT-ASD from occupational therapists' perspectives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A specifically designed online questionnaire was distributed Victoria-wide to occupational therapists with clinical experience with autistic children. The questionnaire was designed in line with the COnsensus-based Standards for selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN), including relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of items evaluated for content validity. Applicability and clinical usefulness were also investigated. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventy-one occupational therapists responded to the questionnaire and 46 provided a full dataset. Over 96% of the respondents considered documenting behaviours and testing accommodations as important, yet less than 45% reported having resources to record this information. Ninety-five percent of the respondents perceived the OTOT-ASD to be useful in clinical practice. Over 70% agreed that OTOT-ASD items were significantly relevant to practice and comprehensive. To improve comprehensibility, identified items were altered following feedback.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings suggest that the OTOT-ASD is clinically useful and content validity is sound. Further research on other psychometric properties of the OTOT-ASD and users' qualitative experiences in utilising the tool is recommended.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1630.12924","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupational Therapy Observation Tool–Adjustment Support Details for autistic children: Investigation of content validity and clinical utility\",\"authors\":\"WingKwan Michelle Kwok, Helen Bourke-Taylor, Stuart Carey, Maria McKenzie\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1440-1630.12924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Standardised testing is crucial for autistic children to receive appropriate interventions, necessary services, and funding. Behaviours associated with autism can hinder children's test performance and participation. The 18-item, two-page Occupational Therapy Observation Tool–Adjustment Support Details (OTOT-ASD) is used in conjunction with standardised assessments. The OTOT-ASD enables the recording of autism-related behaviours and the reasonable assessment accommodations made to support participation in testing. The current study aims to investigate the content validity and clinical utility of the OTOT-ASD from occupational therapists' perspectives.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>A specifically designed online questionnaire was distributed Victoria-wide to occupational therapists with clinical experience with autistic children. The questionnaire was designed in line with the COnsensus-based Standards for selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN), including relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of items evaluated for content validity. Applicability and clinical usefulness were also investigated. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Seventy-one occupational therapists responded to the questionnaire and 46 provided a full dataset. Over 96% of the respondents considered documenting behaviours and testing accommodations as important, yet less than 45% reported having resources to record this information. Ninety-five percent of the respondents perceived the OTOT-ASD to be useful in clinical practice. Over 70% agreed that OTOT-ASD items were significantly relevant to practice and comprehensive. To improve comprehensibility, identified items were altered following feedback.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The findings suggest that the OTOT-ASD is clinically useful and content validity is sound. Further research on other psychometric properties of the OTOT-ASD and users' qualitative experiences in utilising the tool is recommended.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1630.12924\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.12924\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.12924","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Occupational Therapy Observation Tool–Adjustment Support Details for autistic children: Investigation of content validity and clinical utility
Introduction
Standardised testing is crucial for autistic children to receive appropriate interventions, necessary services, and funding. Behaviours associated with autism can hinder children's test performance and participation. The 18-item, two-page Occupational Therapy Observation Tool–Adjustment Support Details (OTOT-ASD) is used in conjunction with standardised assessments. The OTOT-ASD enables the recording of autism-related behaviours and the reasonable assessment accommodations made to support participation in testing. The current study aims to investigate the content validity and clinical utility of the OTOT-ASD from occupational therapists' perspectives.
Method
A specifically designed online questionnaire was distributed Victoria-wide to occupational therapists with clinical experience with autistic children. The questionnaire was designed in line with the COnsensus-based Standards for selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN), including relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of items evaluated for content validity. Applicability and clinical usefulness were also investigated. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics.
Results
Seventy-one occupational therapists responded to the questionnaire and 46 provided a full dataset. Over 96% of the respondents considered documenting behaviours and testing accommodations as important, yet less than 45% reported having resources to record this information. Ninety-five percent of the respondents perceived the OTOT-ASD to be useful in clinical practice. Over 70% agreed that OTOT-ASD items were significantly relevant to practice and comprehensive. To improve comprehensibility, identified items were altered following feedback.
Conclusion
The findings suggest that the OTOT-ASD is clinically useful and content validity is sound. Further research on other psychometric properties of the OTOT-ASD and users' qualitative experiences in utilising the tool is recommended.
期刊介绍：
The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design
The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
