概述苏丹几十年来农业合作社的发展情况,特别强调阿拉伯树胶生产者协会 (GAPA)

IF 2.2 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Asma, E.M. Elzubair , Elamin Sanjak , Dafa-Alla M.D. Ahmed , Dietrich Darr
{"title":"概述苏丹几十年来农业合作社的发展情况,特别强调阿拉伯树胶生产者协会 (GAPA)","authors":"Asma, E.M. Elzubair ,&nbsp;Elamin Sanjak ,&nbsp;Dafa-Alla M.D. Ahmed ,&nbsp;Dietrich Darr","doi":"10.1016/j.jcom.2023.100217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper aims to highlight the historical development of agricultural cooperatives in Sudan by examining Gum Arabic Producers’ Associations (GAPAs) as a case study. Using a systematic literature review approach, the article relied on desk research from relevant secondary sources. Past and current data on the GAPAs’ development were analyzed to present trends. While various forms of traditional cooperation in the agriculture sector exist in Sudan, the first formal attempt to establish cooperatives was undertaken in the 1920s. The development of the cooperative movement was strongly influenced by changing governmental policies during the different governmental eras. Political intervention, lack of finance, poor infrastructure and limited capacity of cooperative members and managers were major constraints that hindered the cooperative movement. GAPAs were first established in 1992 in North Kordofan State, and the model was scaled up in 2005 to the whole country. The main objective of GAPAs is to increase the production of gum Arabic, for example by reducing the members’ dependency on the traditional finance (<em>Shail</em>) system. However, GAPAs have faced the same constraints that also hindered other types of agricultural cooperatives. The government’s focus on primarily increasing the number of GAPAs and size of membership rather than improving their organizational capacity and quality of services to members has largely rendered the GAPAs ineffective. Therefore, the study recommends raising awareness among policymakers in Sudan for the problems GAPAs and other agricultural cooperatives currently face, as well as of local communities working in agriculture for the antecedents and benefits of collective action, which remains an urgent priority.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An overview of the development of agricultural cooperatives in Sudan over decades with special emphasis on Gum Arabic Producers’ Associations (GAPAs)\",\"authors\":\"Asma, E.M. Elzubair ,&nbsp;Elamin Sanjak ,&nbsp;Dafa-Alla M.D. Ahmed ,&nbsp;Dietrich Darr\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcom.2023.100217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper aims to highlight the historical development of agricultural cooperatives in Sudan by examining Gum Arabic Producers’ Associations (GAPAs) as a case study. Using a systematic literature review approach, the article relied on desk research from relevant secondary sources. Past and current data on the GAPAs’ development were analyzed to present trends. While various forms of traditional cooperation in the agriculture sector exist in Sudan, the first formal attempt to establish cooperatives was undertaken in the 1920s. The development of the cooperative movement was strongly influenced by changing governmental policies during the different governmental eras. Political intervention, lack of finance, poor infrastructure and limited capacity of cooperative members and managers were major constraints that hindered the cooperative movement. GAPAs were first established in 1992 in North Kordofan State, and the model was scaled up in 2005 to the whole country. The main objective of GAPAs is to increase the production of gum Arabic, for example by reducing the members’ dependency on the traditional finance (<em>Shail</em>) system. However, GAPAs have faced the same constraints that also hindered other types of agricultural cooperatives. The government’s focus on primarily increasing the number of GAPAs and size of membership rather than improving their organizational capacity and quality of services to members has largely rendered the GAPAs ineffective. Therefore, the study recommends raising awareness among policymakers in Sudan for the problems GAPAs and other agricultural cooperatives currently face, as well as of local communities working in agriculture for the antecedents and benefits of collective action, which remains an urgent priority.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213297X23000204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213297X23000204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在通过将阿拉伯树胶生产者协会(GAPAs)作为案例研究,突出苏丹农业合作社的历史发展。文章采用系统的文献综述方法,从相关的二手资料来源进行案头研究。文章对阿拉伯树胶生产者协会过去和现在的发展数据进行了分析,以呈现发展趋势。虽然苏丹农业部门存在各种形式的传统合作,但第一次正式尝试建立合作社是在 20 世纪 20 年代。合作社运动的发展受到不同政府时期不断变化的政府政策的强烈影响。政治干预、资金短缺、基础设施薄弱以及合作社成员和管理人员能力有限是阻碍合作社运动发展的主要制约因素。GAPA 于 1992 年首次在北科尔多凡州成立,2005 年该模式推广到全国。合作社的主要目标是提高阿拉伯树胶的产量,例如减少社员对传统金融(Shail)系统的依赖。然而,阿拉伯树胶合作社也面临着其他类型农业合作社同样面临的制约因素。政府主要关注的是增加 GAPA 的数量和成员规模,而不是提高其组织能力和为成员提供服务的质量,这在很大程度上导致了 GAPA 的效率低下。因此,本研究建议提高苏丹决策者对两性平等行动方案和其他农业合作社目前所面临问题的认识,并提高从事农业工作的当地社区对集体行动的前因后果和益处的认识,这仍是当务之急。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An overview of the development of agricultural cooperatives in Sudan over decades with special emphasis on Gum Arabic Producers’ Associations (GAPAs)

This paper aims to highlight the historical development of agricultural cooperatives in Sudan by examining Gum Arabic Producers’ Associations (GAPAs) as a case study. Using a systematic literature review approach, the article relied on desk research from relevant secondary sources. Past and current data on the GAPAs’ development were analyzed to present trends. While various forms of traditional cooperation in the agriculture sector exist in Sudan, the first formal attempt to establish cooperatives was undertaken in the 1920s. The development of the cooperative movement was strongly influenced by changing governmental policies during the different governmental eras. Political intervention, lack of finance, poor infrastructure and limited capacity of cooperative members and managers were major constraints that hindered the cooperative movement. GAPAs were first established in 1992 in North Kordofan State, and the model was scaled up in 2005 to the whole country. The main objective of GAPAs is to increase the production of gum Arabic, for example by reducing the members’ dependency on the traditional finance (Shail) system. However, GAPAs have faced the same constraints that also hindered other types of agricultural cooperatives. The government’s focus on primarily increasing the number of GAPAs and size of membership rather than improving their organizational capacity and quality of services to members has largely rendered the GAPAs ineffective. Therefore, the study recommends raising awareness among policymakers in Sudan for the problems GAPAs and other agricultural cooperatives currently face, as well as of local communities working in agriculture for the antecedents and benefits of collective action, which remains an urgent priority.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
19.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信