量化弹性印模材料的流动性和亲水性。

Csaba Dudás, Zsuzsanna Bardocz-Veres, Balázs-Zoltán Metz, Róbert Opra, Mária Henrietta Dudas, Bernadette Kerekes-Máthé
{"title":"量化弹性印模材料的流动性和亲水性。","authors":"Csaba Dudás, Zsuzsanna Bardocz-Veres, Balázs-Zoltán Metz, Róbert Opra, Mária Henrietta Dudas, Bernadette Kerekes-Máthé","doi":"10.2478/asmj-2023-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: Flowability and hydrophilicity are essential properties of accurate impressions and casts. Aim of study: This study aimed to quantify these characteristics of elastomeric impression materials. Material and Methods: A total number of eight impression materials, including vinyl polysiloxane (PVS), polyether (PE), and condensation silicone (CS) were thoroughly investigated in this study. The flowability of elastomers was proven with the shark fin test (SFT), and the hydrophilicity was determined with contact angle (CA) measurements. Results: The shark fins’ (SF) of VPSs presented 11.57 mm (SD 3.49), while the PE 11.37 mm (SD 5.06) and CS 8.1 mm average values. Some of the products showed better flowability. Based on 128 measured CAs, the examined polyethers had the lowest CAs which indicate good hydrophilicity. Conclusions: A good performance of an impression material in one of the involved tests (SFT and CA) does not mean a similar result in the other analysis. All investigated impression materials could be considered hydrophilic as their CA was lower than 90°. The SFTs of light-bodied VPSs and PEs suggest reliable use of them in dental practice.","PeriodicalId":120290,"journal":{"name":"Acta Stomatologica Marisiensis Journal","volume":"226 ","pages":"33 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantification of flowability and hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.\",\"authors\":\"Csaba Dudás, Zsuzsanna Bardocz-Veres, Balázs-Zoltán Metz, Róbert Opra, Mária Henrietta Dudas, Bernadette Kerekes-Máthé\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/asmj-2023-0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Introduction: Flowability and hydrophilicity are essential properties of accurate impressions and casts. Aim of study: This study aimed to quantify these characteristics of elastomeric impression materials. Material and Methods: A total number of eight impression materials, including vinyl polysiloxane (PVS), polyether (PE), and condensation silicone (CS) were thoroughly investigated in this study. The flowability of elastomers was proven with the shark fin test (SFT), and the hydrophilicity was determined with contact angle (CA) measurements. Results: The shark fins’ (SF) of VPSs presented 11.57 mm (SD 3.49), while the PE 11.37 mm (SD 5.06) and CS 8.1 mm average values. Some of the products showed better flowability. Based on 128 measured CAs, the examined polyethers had the lowest CAs which indicate good hydrophilicity. Conclusions: A good performance of an impression material in one of the involved tests (SFT and CA) does not mean a similar result in the other analysis. All investigated impression materials could be considered hydrophilic as their CA was lower than 90°. The SFTs of light-bodied VPSs and PEs suggest reliable use of them in dental practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Stomatologica Marisiensis Journal\",\"volume\":\"226 \",\"pages\":\"33 - 38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Stomatologica Marisiensis Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/asmj-2023-0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Stomatologica Marisiensis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/asmj-2023-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 简介:流动性和亲水性是精确印模和铸模的基本特性。研究目的本研究旨在量化弹性印模材料的这些特性。材料与方法:本研究对乙烯基聚硅氧烷(PVS)、聚醚(PE)和缩合硅氧烷(CS)等八种印模材料进行了深入研究。弹性体的流动性由鲨鱼鳍试验(SFT)证明,亲水性由接触角(CA)测量确定。研究结果VPS 的鲨鱼鳍(SF)平均值为 11.57 毫米(SD 3.49),而 PE 的鲨鱼鳍(SF)平均值为 11.37 毫米(SD 5.06),CS 的鲨鱼鳍(SF)平均值为 8.1 毫米。一些产品显示出更好的流动性。根据测得的 128 个 CA 值,所研究的聚醚的 CA 值最低,这表明它们具有良好的亲水性。结论印模材料在其中一项测试(SFT 和 CA)中表现良好,并不意味着在其他分析中也有类似的结果。所有调查的印模材料都可以被认为是亲水性的,因为它们的 CA 都低于 90°。轻质 VPS 和 PE 的 SFT 值表明在牙科实践中使用它们是可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantification of flowability and hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
Abstract Introduction: Flowability and hydrophilicity are essential properties of accurate impressions and casts. Aim of study: This study aimed to quantify these characteristics of elastomeric impression materials. Material and Methods: A total number of eight impression materials, including vinyl polysiloxane (PVS), polyether (PE), and condensation silicone (CS) were thoroughly investigated in this study. The flowability of elastomers was proven with the shark fin test (SFT), and the hydrophilicity was determined with contact angle (CA) measurements. Results: The shark fins’ (SF) of VPSs presented 11.57 mm (SD 3.49), while the PE 11.37 mm (SD 5.06) and CS 8.1 mm average values. Some of the products showed better flowability. Based on 128 measured CAs, the examined polyethers had the lowest CAs which indicate good hydrophilicity. Conclusions: A good performance of an impression material in one of the involved tests (SFT and CA) does not mean a similar result in the other analysis. All investigated impression materials could be considered hydrophilic as their CA was lower than 90°. The SFTs of light-bodied VPSs and PEs suggest reliable use of them in dental practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信