曾经认识的工人:与《科学史》中的一次性、被丢弃、贴错标签和岌岌可危的劳动者一起思考

IF 1 2区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Isis Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1086/727760
G. S. Laveaga
{"title":"曾经认识的工人:与《科学史》中的一次性、被丢弃、贴错标签和岌岌可危的劳动者一起思考","authors":"G. S. Laveaga","doi":"10.1086/727760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do we reevaluate the role of individuals whose contributions have not been erased—they are still visible—but whose labor has been demoted in the historical narrative because of their gender, class, or ethnicity? This brief essay is about more than simply bringing in overlooked actors; instead, it ponders why the act of mislabeling a person’s labor merits further deliberation. Mislabeled archival evidence, such as the erroneous description accompanying a photograph that this essay discusses, might uphold problematic assumptions in the history of science about who can perform certain labors. Such mistakes, careless or otherwise, produce enduring historiographic harm because such errors make it harder to construct other versions of the past.","PeriodicalId":14667,"journal":{"name":"Isis","volume":"565 ","pages":"834 - 840"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Worker Once Known: Thinking with Disposable, Discarded, Mislabeled, and Precariously Employed Laborers in History of Science\",\"authors\":\"G. S. Laveaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/727760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How do we reevaluate the role of individuals whose contributions have not been erased—they are still visible—but whose labor has been demoted in the historical narrative because of their gender, class, or ethnicity? This brief essay is about more than simply bringing in overlooked actors; instead, it ponders why the act of mislabeling a person’s labor merits further deliberation. Mislabeled archival evidence, such as the erroneous description accompanying a photograph that this essay discusses, might uphold problematic assumptions in the history of science about who can perform certain labors. Such mistakes, careless or otherwise, produce enduring historiographic harm because such errors make it harder to construct other versions of the past.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Isis\",\"volume\":\"565 \",\"pages\":\"834 - 840\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Isis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/727760\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Isis","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/727760","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们该如何重新评估那些其贡献并未被抹杀--他们依然可见--但其劳动却因其性别、阶级或种族而在历史叙事中被贬低的个人的作用?这篇简短的文章不仅仅是简单地引入被忽视的参与者;相反,它还思考了为什么对一个人的劳动进行错误标注的行为值得进一步深思。贴错标签的档案证据,比如本文讨论的一张照片所附的错误描述,可能会维护科学史中关于谁能从事某些劳动的有问题的假设。这些错误,不管是粗心大意还是其他原因,都会产生持久的史学危害,因为这些错误会使我们更难构建其他版本的过去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Worker Once Known: Thinking with Disposable, Discarded, Mislabeled, and Precariously Employed Laborers in History of Science
How do we reevaluate the role of individuals whose contributions have not been erased—they are still visible—but whose labor has been demoted in the historical narrative because of their gender, class, or ethnicity? This brief essay is about more than simply bringing in overlooked actors; instead, it ponders why the act of mislabeling a person’s labor merits further deliberation. Mislabeled archival evidence, such as the erroneous description accompanying a photograph that this essay discusses, might uphold problematic assumptions in the history of science about who can perform certain labors. Such mistakes, careless or otherwise, produce enduring historiographic harm because such errors make it harder to construct other versions of the past.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Isis
Isis 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
150
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1912, Isis has featured scholarly articles, research notes, and commentary on the history of science, medicine, and technology and their cultural influences. Review essays and book reviews on new contributions to the discipline are also included. An official publication of the History of Science Society, Isis is the oldest English-language journal in the field. The Press, along with the journal’s editorial office in Starkville, MS, would like to acknowledge the following supporters: Mississippi State University, its College of Arts and Sciences and History Department, and the Consortium for the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信