基于 HFACS-AHP 的空中交通管制员人为失误研究

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Shouxi Zhu, Jian Chen
{"title":"基于 HFACS-AHP 的空中交通管制员人为失误研究","authors":"Shouxi Zhu, Jian Chen","doi":"10.3233/jcm227000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Safety is the lifeline of civil aviation. With the advancement of technology, human factors have become the primary factor affecting aviation safety. Among these, human errors in air traffic control (ATC) account for a significant proportion of aviation accidents. In order to investigate human errors in ATC, this paper introduces two common human factors conceptual models – the Reason model and the HFACS model, and analyzes the specific application of the HFACS model in aviation. It is found that the HFACS model can effectively establish a classification system for human errors in ATC. Moreover, this paper combines the HFACS model with AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and uses the HFACS model to establish a first and second level indicator system for human errors in ATC. We calculated the weights of each specific factor using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. The results show that the most significant influencing factor in the first level indicators is organizational factors, while the most significant influencing factor in the second level indicators is Air Traffic Resource Management. Among the 13 second level indicators, the smallest weight is the controller’s violation. Based on the calculated weight results, in order to improve the safety level of ATC, the first step should be to improve the level of ATC organizational management. This is also of great significance for improving the safety level of the entire aviation system. The findings of this study suggest that the HFACS model, combined with AHP, can be an effective tool for identifying and analyzing human factors in ATC and ultimately improving the safety of the aviation industry.","PeriodicalId":45004,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering","volume":"4 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study on human errors of air traffic controllers based on HFACS-AHP\",\"authors\":\"Shouxi Zhu, Jian Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/jcm227000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Safety is the lifeline of civil aviation. With the advancement of technology, human factors have become the primary factor affecting aviation safety. Among these, human errors in air traffic control (ATC) account for a significant proportion of aviation accidents. In order to investigate human errors in ATC, this paper introduces two common human factors conceptual models – the Reason model and the HFACS model, and analyzes the specific application of the HFACS model in aviation. It is found that the HFACS model can effectively establish a classification system for human errors in ATC. Moreover, this paper combines the HFACS model with AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and uses the HFACS model to establish a first and second level indicator system for human errors in ATC. We calculated the weights of each specific factor using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. The results show that the most significant influencing factor in the first level indicators is organizational factors, while the most significant influencing factor in the second level indicators is Air Traffic Resource Management. Among the 13 second level indicators, the smallest weight is the controller’s violation. Based on the calculated weight results, in order to improve the safety level of ATC, the first step should be to improve the level of ATC organizational management. This is also of great significance for improving the safety level of the entire aviation system. The findings of this study suggest that the HFACS model, combined with AHP, can be an effective tool for identifying and analyzing human factors in ATC and ultimately improving the safety of the aviation industry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"4 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/jcm227000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/jcm227000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

安全是民航的生命线。随着技术的进步,人为因素已成为影响航空安全的首要因素。其中,空中交通管制(ATC)中的人为失误在航空事故中占有相当大的比例。为了研究空管中的人为失误,本文介绍了两种常见的人为因素概念模型--Reason 模型和 HFACS 模型,并分析了 HFACS 模型在航空中的具体应用。研究发现,HFACS 模型可以有效地建立空管人为错误的分类体系。此外,本文还将 HFACS 模型与 AHP(层次分析法)相结合,利用 HFACS 模型建立了空管人为错误的一级和二级指标体系。我们利用层次分析法计算了各具体因素的权重。结果显示,一级指标中最重要的影响因素是组织因素,而二级指标中最重要的影响因素是空中交通管理。在 13 个二级指标中,权重最小的是管制员的违规行为。根据权重计算结果,要提高空管安全水平,首先应提高空管组织管理水平。这对于提高整个航空系统的安全水平也具有重要意义。本研究结果表明,HFACS 模型与 AHP 相结合,可以成为识别和分析空管中人为因素的有效工具,并最终提高航空业的安全水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A study on human errors of air traffic controllers based on HFACS-AHP
Safety is the lifeline of civil aviation. With the advancement of technology, human factors have become the primary factor affecting aviation safety. Among these, human errors in air traffic control (ATC) account for a significant proportion of aviation accidents. In order to investigate human errors in ATC, this paper introduces two common human factors conceptual models – the Reason model and the HFACS model, and analyzes the specific application of the HFACS model in aviation. It is found that the HFACS model can effectively establish a classification system for human errors in ATC. Moreover, this paper combines the HFACS model with AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and uses the HFACS model to establish a first and second level indicator system for human errors in ATC. We calculated the weights of each specific factor using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. The results show that the most significant influencing factor in the first level indicators is organizational factors, while the most significant influencing factor in the second level indicators is Air Traffic Resource Management. Among the 13 second level indicators, the smallest weight is the controller’s violation. Based on the calculated weight results, in order to improve the safety level of ATC, the first step should be to improve the level of ATC organizational management. This is also of great significance for improving the safety level of the entire aviation system. The findings of this study suggest that the HFACS model, combined with AHP, can be an effective tool for identifying and analyzing human factors in ATC and ultimately improving the safety of the aviation industry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
152
期刊介绍: The major goal of the Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering (JCMSE) is the publication of new research results on computational methods in sciences and engineering. Common experience had taught us that computational methods originally developed in a given basic science, e.g. physics, can be of paramount importance to other neighboring sciences, e.g. chemistry, as well as to engineering or technology and, in turn, to society as a whole. This undoubtedly beneficial practice of interdisciplinary interactions will be continuously and systematically encouraged by the JCMSE.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信