鱼钩类型对休闲捕鱼中鱼类的捕获效果、伤害和存活率的影响

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Wan Zabidii Wan Morni, L. Y. Abit, Siti Nur Sahwati Rusdi, Nicole Lee Siao Yen
{"title":"鱼钩类型对休闲捕鱼中鱼类的捕获效果、伤害和存活率的影响","authors":"Wan Zabidii Wan Morni, L. Y. Abit, Siti Nur Sahwati Rusdi, Nicole Lee Siao Yen","doi":"10.55230/mabjournal.v52i5.fisas13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The physical damage inflicted on captured fish in recreational fishing activities tends to be influenced by hook type. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the suitability of hook type for catching fish as well as the evaluation of injuries and survival rates after catch-and-release. The sampling was conducted at a recreational fish pond situated at Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus from July until November 2022. Three sets of fishing rods with two types of hooks (circle hook & octopus hook) were used in this study. The catch efficiency, injury level, and survival rates of both types of hooks were assessed. A total of 41 and 22 fish were successfully caught using circle hooks and octopus hooks, respectively. Of the total fish caught, 39 out of 41 and nine out of 22 of the fishes caught were tilapia. The hooking location (non-critical area) of octopus hooks and circle hooks on the tilapia was approximately 100% and 81.8%, respectively. A total of 15.38% of hooks are located within the critical area (gills) of tilapia when using the circle hook and none for octopus hooks. There was 100% mortality in fish hooked in the critical area, for instance, hooks pinned inside gills. This occurrence may relate to the shape of the circle hook whereby the length of the gape is shorter in comparison to the octopus hook. Now when fish ingested the bait, the hook easily entered deeper areas of the fish’s mouth, which led to severe damage. Thus the present study recommends the use of octopus hooks in recreational fishing to reduce fish mortality rate for catch and release excursions. The results obtained from this study will be useful baseline input for recreational anglers to improve C&R practices in Malaysia.","PeriodicalId":18160,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian applied biology","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hook Types Influence The Catch Effectiveness, Injuries, and Survival Rates of Fishes in Recreational Fishing\",\"authors\":\"Wan Zabidii Wan Morni, L. Y. Abit, Siti Nur Sahwati Rusdi, Nicole Lee Siao Yen\",\"doi\":\"10.55230/mabjournal.v52i5.fisas13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The physical damage inflicted on captured fish in recreational fishing activities tends to be influenced by hook type. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the suitability of hook type for catching fish as well as the evaluation of injuries and survival rates after catch-and-release. The sampling was conducted at a recreational fish pond situated at Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus from July until November 2022. Three sets of fishing rods with two types of hooks (circle hook & octopus hook) were used in this study. The catch efficiency, injury level, and survival rates of both types of hooks were assessed. A total of 41 and 22 fish were successfully caught using circle hooks and octopus hooks, respectively. Of the total fish caught, 39 out of 41 and nine out of 22 of the fishes caught were tilapia. The hooking location (non-critical area) of octopus hooks and circle hooks on the tilapia was approximately 100% and 81.8%, respectively. A total of 15.38% of hooks are located within the critical area (gills) of tilapia when using the circle hook and none for octopus hooks. There was 100% mortality in fish hooked in the critical area, for instance, hooks pinned inside gills. This occurrence may relate to the shape of the circle hook whereby the length of the gape is shorter in comparison to the octopus hook. Now when fish ingested the bait, the hook easily entered deeper areas of the fish’s mouth, which led to severe damage. Thus the present study recommends the use of octopus hooks in recreational fishing to reduce fish mortality rate for catch and release excursions. The results obtained from this study will be useful baseline input for recreational anglers to improve C&R practices in Malaysia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaysian applied biology\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaysian applied biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55230/mabjournal.v52i5.fisas13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian applied biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55230/mabjournal.v52i5.fisas13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在休闲捕鱼活动中,鱼钩类型往往会对捕获的鱼造成物理伤害。因此,本研究旨在调查鱼钩类型是否适合捕捉鱼类,并评估捕捉和释放后的伤害和存活率。取样工作于 2022 年 7 月至 11 月在马来西亚博特拉大学民都鲁沙捞越校区的一个休闲鱼塘进行。本研究使用了三套钓竿和两种鱼钩(圆钩和章鱼钩)。对两种鱼钩的捕获效率、受伤程度和存活率进行了评估。使用圆钩和章鱼钩分别成功捕获了 41 条和 22 条鱼。在捕获的所有鱼类中,41 条鱼中有 39 条是罗非鱼,22 条鱼中有 9 条是罗非鱼。章鱼钩和圈钩在罗非鱼身上的上钩位置(非临界区)分别约为 100%和 81.8%。使用圆钩时,共有 15.38% 的鱼钩位于罗非鱼的临界区(鳃)内,章鱼钩则没有。在临界区上钩的鱼死亡率为 100%,例如,鱼钩钉在鳃内。出现这种情况可能与圆钩的形状有关,与章鱼钩相比,圆钩的钩口长度较短。现在,当鱼摄入饵料时,鱼钩很容易进入鱼嘴较深的区域,导致严重损伤。因此,本研究建议在休闲垂钓中使用章鱼钩,以降低渔获和放生活动中的鱼类死亡率。这项研究的结果将为休闲垂钓者提供有用的基准信息,以改进马来西亚的渔获和放生做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hook Types Influence The Catch Effectiveness, Injuries, and Survival Rates of Fishes in Recreational Fishing
The physical damage inflicted on captured fish in recreational fishing activities tends to be influenced by hook type. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the suitability of hook type for catching fish as well as the evaluation of injuries and survival rates after catch-and-release. The sampling was conducted at a recreational fish pond situated at Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus from July until November 2022. Three sets of fishing rods with two types of hooks (circle hook & octopus hook) were used in this study. The catch efficiency, injury level, and survival rates of both types of hooks were assessed. A total of 41 and 22 fish were successfully caught using circle hooks and octopus hooks, respectively. Of the total fish caught, 39 out of 41 and nine out of 22 of the fishes caught were tilapia. The hooking location (non-critical area) of octopus hooks and circle hooks on the tilapia was approximately 100% and 81.8%, respectively. A total of 15.38% of hooks are located within the critical area (gills) of tilapia when using the circle hook and none for octopus hooks. There was 100% mortality in fish hooked in the critical area, for instance, hooks pinned inside gills. This occurrence may relate to the shape of the circle hook whereby the length of the gape is shorter in comparison to the octopus hook. Now when fish ingested the bait, the hook easily entered deeper areas of the fish’s mouth, which led to severe damage. Thus the present study recommends the use of octopus hooks in recreational fishing to reduce fish mortality rate for catch and release excursions. The results obtained from this study will be useful baseline input for recreational anglers to improve C&R practices in Malaysia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Malaysian applied biology
Malaysian applied biology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信