血清学、ELISA 和分子检验在诊断人血清中流产布鲁氏菌方面的比较评估

Fereshteh Ghanbari, Haniyeh Bashi Zadeh Fakhar, Saeed Alamian, Babak Shaghaghi
{"title":"血清学、ELISA 和分子检验在诊断人血清中流产布鲁氏菌方面的比较评估","authors":"Fereshteh Ghanbari, Haniyeh Bashi Zadeh Fakhar, Saeed Alamian, Babak Shaghaghi","doi":"10.18502/jmb.v11i5-6.14361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Brucellosis is one of the most prevalent and common diseases between humans and animals.Prompt diagnosis and timely treatment of this disease can prevent many complications. In this regard, this study aims to comparatively evaluate ELISA, PCR and serological methods to identify Brucella abortus. \nMethods: In this study, the serum of 100 patients referred to Tonekabon private laboratory from July 2020 to January 2021 was examined by PCR, ELISA and Wright, Coombs Wright, and 2ME methods for the detection of Brucella abortus. \nResults: In this study, the mean age of the sample was 43.3 ± 18.2 of which 21% were infected with Brucella abortus according to the above serological methods. According to ELISA test, 22% of the samples were IgM, 6% of the samples were IgG and 16% were PCR positive. Kappa agreement coefficient in Wright and Coombs Wright test and 2me were significant (P <0.001). Serological diagnostic indices and ELISA sensitivity were 68.75% and 68.75%, respectively. The lowest prediction rate of Brucella abortus among diagnostic methods was related to Elisa (IgM). Based on Fisher's exact test, there was no significant relationship between the percentage of Brucella abortus positive PCR cases and age, sex, previous history of infection with Brucella, fever, body aches and dairy consumption. \nConclusion: Based on the results of our study, the accuracy of all methods is comparative and the lowest accuracy is related to Elisa (IgM) which has a lower level of predictability than other methods. The highest level of prediction belonged to Wright and 2me tests.","PeriodicalId":30437,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Bacteriology","volume":"290 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of Serological, ELISA and Molecular Tests in Diagnosis of Brucella abortus in Human Serum\",\"authors\":\"Fereshteh Ghanbari, Haniyeh Bashi Zadeh Fakhar, Saeed Alamian, Babak Shaghaghi\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jmb.v11i5-6.14361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Brucellosis is one of the most prevalent and common diseases between humans and animals.Prompt diagnosis and timely treatment of this disease can prevent many complications. In this regard, this study aims to comparatively evaluate ELISA, PCR and serological methods to identify Brucella abortus. \\nMethods: In this study, the serum of 100 patients referred to Tonekabon private laboratory from July 2020 to January 2021 was examined by PCR, ELISA and Wright, Coombs Wright, and 2ME methods for the detection of Brucella abortus. \\nResults: In this study, the mean age of the sample was 43.3 ± 18.2 of which 21% were infected with Brucella abortus according to the above serological methods. According to ELISA test, 22% of the samples were IgM, 6% of the samples were IgG and 16% were PCR positive. Kappa agreement coefficient in Wright and Coombs Wright test and 2me were significant (P <0.001). Serological diagnostic indices and ELISA sensitivity were 68.75% and 68.75%, respectively. The lowest prediction rate of Brucella abortus among diagnostic methods was related to Elisa (IgM). Based on Fisher's exact test, there was no significant relationship between the percentage of Brucella abortus positive PCR cases and age, sex, previous history of infection with Brucella, fever, body aches and dairy consumption. \\nConclusion: Based on the results of our study, the accuracy of all methods is comparative and the lowest accuracy is related to Elisa (IgM) which has a lower level of predictability than other methods. The highest level of prediction belonged to Wright and 2me tests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Bacteriology\",\"volume\":\"290 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Bacteriology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmb.v11i5-6.14361\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Bacteriology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmb.v11i5-6.14361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:布鲁氏菌病是人与动物之间最流行、最常见的疾病之一。因此,本研究旨在对 ELISA、PCR 和血清学方法进行比较评估,以确定流产布鲁氏菌。方法:本研究采用 PCR、ELISA、Wright、Coombs Wright 和 2ME 方法检测了 2020 年 7 月至 2021 年 1 月期间转诊到 Tonekabon 私人实验室的 100 名患者的血清中的流产布鲁氏菌。结果:本研究中,样本的平均年龄为(43.3 ± 18.2)岁,根据上述血清学方法,其中 21% 感染了流产布鲁氏菌。根据 ELISA 检测,22% 的样本为 IgM 阳性,6% 的样本为 IgG 阳性,16% 的样本为 PCR 阳性。Wright 和 Coombs Wright 检验的 Kappa 一致系数和 2me 显著(P <0.001)。血清学诊断指数和酶联免疫吸附试验灵敏度分别为 68.75% 和 68.75%。在所有诊断方法中,Elisa(IgM)对流产布鲁氏菌的预测率最低。根据费雪精确检验,流产布鲁氏菌 PCR 阳性病例的百分比与年龄、性别、既往布鲁氏菌感染史、发烧、身体疼痛和食用奶制品之间没有明显关系。结论根据我们的研究结果,所有方法的准确性都具有可比性,准确性最低的是 Elisa(IgM),其预测水平低于其他方法。预测水平最高的是赖特和 2me 试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Evaluation of Serological, ELISA and Molecular Tests in Diagnosis of Brucella abortus in Human Serum
Background: Brucellosis is one of the most prevalent and common diseases between humans and animals.Prompt diagnosis and timely treatment of this disease can prevent many complications. In this regard, this study aims to comparatively evaluate ELISA, PCR and serological methods to identify Brucella abortus. Methods: In this study, the serum of 100 patients referred to Tonekabon private laboratory from July 2020 to January 2021 was examined by PCR, ELISA and Wright, Coombs Wright, and 2ME methods for the detection of Brucella abortus. Results: In this study, the mean age of the sample was 43.3 ± 18.2 of which 21% were infected with Brucella abortus according to the above serological methods. According to ELISA test, 22% of the samples were IgM, 6% of the samples were IgG and 16% were PCR positive. Kappa agreement coefficient in Wright and Coombs Wright test and 2me were significant (P <0.001). Serological diagnostic indices and ELISA sensitivity were 68.75% and 68.75%, respectively. The lowest prediction rate of Brucella abortus among diagnostic methods was related to Elisa (IgM). Based on Fisher's exact test, there was no significant relationship between the percentage of Brucella abortus positive PCR cases and age, sex, previous history of infection with Brucella, fever, body aches and dairy consumption. Conclusion: Based on the results of our study, the accuracy of all methods is comparative and the lowest accuracy is related to Elisa (IgM) which has a lower level of predictability than other methods. The highest level of prediction belonged to Wright and 2me tests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信