为什么数字化未列入地方政治议程?丹麦地方政府的调查结果

Kenneth Kristensen
{"title":"为什么数字化未列入地方政治议程?丹麦地方政府的调查结果","authors":"Kenneth Kristensen","doi":"10.58235/sjpa.2023.10663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nDigitalization is at the very centre of recent development of local government processes, services to citizens, and even democracy. Nevertheless, digitalization is almost absent from the local political agenda in the most likely case of Danish local governments, which constitutes a democratic problem because important priorities are then taken outside of the local political system. Existing quantitative research on setting policy agendas fail to explain why digitalization is not on the local political agenda. A qualitative approach is applied and exclusive insights from interviewed mayors and CEOs are presented. Four main barriers are identified blocking digitalization from the local political agenda: Political role perception, lack of interest, lack of insight, and risks. Further the need of policy entrepreneurs and problem recognition are suggested as additional explanations to why digitalization is not on the local political agenda.\n","PeriodicalId":31772,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration","volume":"15 49","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Digitalization is NOT on the Local Political Agenda: Findings From Danish Local Governments\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Kristensen\",\"doi\":\"10.58235/sjpa.2023.10663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nDigitalization is at the very centre of recent development of local government processes, services to citizens, and even democracy. Nevertheless, digitalization is almost absent from the local political agenda in the most likely case of Danish local governments, which constitutes a democratic problem because important priorities are then taken outside of the local political system. Existing quantitative research on setting policy agendas fail to explain why digitalization is not on the local political agenda. A qualitative approach is applied and exclusive insights from interviewed mayors and CEOs are presented. Four main barriers are identified blocking digitalization from the local political agenda: Political role perception, lack of interest, lack of insight, and risks. Further the need of policy entrepreneurs and problem recognition are suggested as additional explanations to why digitalization is not on the local political agenda.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":31772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration\",\"volume\":\"15 49\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.2023.10663\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.2023.10663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字化是近期地方政府程序、公民服务甚至民主发展的核心。然而,在丹麦地方政府中,数字化几乎没有出现在地方政治议程中,这就构成了一个民主问题,因为重要的优先事项被置于地方政治体系之外。现有的关于政策议程制定的定量研究无法解释为什么数字化没有被列入地方政治议程。本文采用了定性研究方法,并介绍了受访市长和首席执行官的独家见解。研究发现了阻碍数字化进入地方政治议程的四大障碍:政治角色认知、缺乏兴趣、缺乏洞察力和风险。此外,还提出了政策制定者的需求和问题认识,作为数字化未列入地方政治议程的补充解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Digitalization is NOT on the Local Political Agenda: Findings From Danish Local Governments
Digitalization is at the very centre of recent development of local government processes, services to citizens, and even democracy. Nevertheless, digitalization is almost absent from the local political agenda in the most likely case of Danish local governments, which constitutes a democratic problem because important priorities are then taken outside of the local political system. Existing quantitative research on setting policy agendas fail to explain why digitalization is not on the local political agenda. A qualitative approach is applied and exclusive insights from interviewed mayors and CEOs are presented. Four main barriers are identified blocking digitalization from the local political agenda: Political role perception, lack of interest, lack of insight, and risks. Further the need of policy entrepreneurs and problem recognition are suggested as additional explanations to why digitalization is not on the local political agenda.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信