{"title":"胡萝卜在哪里？建议开始奖励同行评审者对科学的贡献","authors":"Aron Laxdal, Tommy Haugen","doi":"10.1002/leap.1589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>The peer review system is viewed by many as being flawed and antiquated.</li>\n \n <li>While it is unlikely that the system will be overhauled completely, some changes seem to be warranted.</li>\n \n <li>Our proposal is to change the incentives to do peer review by making reviews a part of the tenure criteria and valuing reviews as a contribution to the literature.</li>\n \n <li>The proposal would require more transparency than is currently the industry norm to prevent unwanted effects.</li>\n \n <li>We believe these changes would not only increase willingness to review, but also lead to shorter turnaround times and increase the quality of reviews.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"37 2","pages":"154-156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where are the carrots? A proposal to start crediting peer reviewers for their contribution to science\",\"authors\":\"Aron Laxdal, Tommy Haugen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/leap.1589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>The peer review system is viewed by many as being flawed and antiquated.</li>\\n \\n <li>While it is unlikely that the system will be overhauled completely, some changes seem to be warranted.</li>\\n \\n <li>Our proposal is to change the incentives to do peer review by making reviews a part of the tenure criteria and valuing reviews as a contribution to the literature.</li>\\n \\n <li>The proposal would require more transparency than is currently the industry norm to prevent unwanted effects.</li>\\n \\n <li>We believe these changes would not only increase willingness to review, but also lead to shorter turnaround times and increase the quality of reviews.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learned Publishing\",\"volume\":\"37 2\",\"pages\":\"154-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learned Publishing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1589\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learned Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1589","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Where are the carrots? A proposal to start crediting peer reviewers for their contribution to science
The peer review system is viewed by many as being flawed and antiquated.
While it is unlikely that the system will be overhauled completely, some changes seem to be warranted.
Our proposal is to change the incentives to do peer review by making reviews a part of the tenure criteria and valuing reviews as a contribution to the literature.
The proposal would require more transparency than is currently the industry norm to prevent unwanted effects.
We believe these changes would not only increase willingness to review, but also lead to shorter turnaround times and increase the quality of reviews.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
