条约义务与支持集体防御:意大利入侵乌克兰后的证据

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
SARAH KREPS, DOUGLAS L. KRINER
{"title":"条约义务与支持集体防御:意大利入侵乌克兰后的证据","authors":"SARAH KREPS,&nbsp;DOUGLAS L. KRINER","doi":"10.1111/1475-6765.12644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Whether countries and their publics are responsive to the international legal commitments they make is the source of long-standing academic debate. Russia's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine brought real-world significance to these debates. While Ukraine is not a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the invasion raised the prospect that other NATO members could be targeted and that Article 5 collective security commitments would be invoked. While recent research suggests that emphasizing mutual defence treaties can increase public support for defending an ally, prior work focuses on US opinion in a less fraught political environment. We constructed and fielded a survey experiment in Italy in the initial weeks of the Ukraine invasion to probe support for defending a NATO ally, the relevance of the Article 5 legal commitment on support for defending an ally, and the potential moderating influence of gender and political party. Our findings show that the Article 5 commitment significantly increased support for defending an ally. Consistent with past research, we find a significant gender gap, with men being more supportive of defending an ally than women; however, both men and women responded to the Article 5 commitment to virtually the same degree. The estimated treatment effect was larger for supporters of right-wing parties than for the left; however, the difference was not statistically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":48273,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Political Research","volume":"63 3","pages":"1227-1239"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treaty obligations and support for collective defence: Evidence from Italy after the invasion of Ukraine\",\"authors\":\"SARAH KREPS,&nbsp;DOUGLAS L. KRINER\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6765.12644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Whether countries and their publics are responsive to the international legal commitments they make is the source of long-standing academic debate. Russia's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine brought real-world significance to these debates. While Ukraine is not a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the invasion raised the prospect that other NATO members could be targeted and that Article 5 collective security commitments would be invoked. While recent research suggests that emphasizing mutual defence treaties can increase public support for defending an ally, prior work focuses on US opinion in a less fraught political environment. We constructed and fielded a survey experiment in Italy in the initial weeks of the Ukraine invasion to probe support for defending a NATO ally, the relevance of the Article 5 legal commitment on support for defending an ally, and the potential moderating influence of gender and political party. Our findings show that the Article 5 commitment significantly increased support for defending an ally. Consistent with past research, we find a significant gender gap, with men being more supportive of defending an ally than women; however, both men and women responded to the Article 5 commitment to virtually the same degree. The estimated treatment effect was larger for supporters of right-wing parties than for the left; however, the difference was not statistically significant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Political Research\",\"volume\":\"63 3\",\"pages\":\"1227-1239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Political Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.12644\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Political Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.12644","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

各国及其公众是否对其做出的国际法律承诺做出回应是学术界长期争论的焦点。2022 年 2 月俄罗斯入侵乌克兰给这些争论带来了现实意义。虽然乌克兰不是北大西洋公约组织(NATO)的成员,但这次入侵却引发了北约其他成员可能成为攻击目标以及援引第 5 条集体安全承诺的前景。最近的研究表明,强调共同防御条约可以增加公众对保卫盟友的支持,但之前的研究主要集中在政治环境不那么紧张的美国舆论上。在乌克兰入侵的最初几周,我们在意大利开展了一项调查实验,以探究公众对保卫北约盟国的支持度、第 5 条法律承诺对保卫盟国支持度的相关性,以及性别和政党的潜在调节作用。我们的研究结果表明,第 5 条承诺大大增加了对保卫盟友的支持。与过去的研究一致,我们发现了明显的性别差异,男性比女性更支持捍卫盟友;然而,男性和女性对第 5 条承诺的反应程度几乎相同。右翼政党支持者的估计治疗效果大于左翼政党支持者;但是,这种差异在统计上并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treaty obligations and support for collective defence: Evidence from Italy after the invasion of Ukraine

Whether countries and their publics are responsive to the international legal commitments they make is the source of long-standing academic debate. Russia's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine brought real-world significance to these debates. While Ukraine is not a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the invasion raised the prospect that other NATO members could be targeted and that Article 5 collective security commitments would be invoked. While recent research suggests that emphasizing mutual defence treaties can increase public support for defending an ally, prior work focuses on US opinion in a less fraught political environment. We constructed and fielded a survey experiment in Italy in the initial weeks of the Ukraine invasion to probe support for defending a NATO ally, the relevance of the Article 5 legal commitment on support for defending an ally, and the potential moderating influence of gender and political party. Our findings show that the Article 5 commitment significantly increased support for defending an ally. Consistent with past research, we find a significant gender gap, with men being more supportive of defending an ally than women; however, both men and women responded to the Article 5 commitment to virtually the same degree. The estimated treatment effect was larger for supporters of right-wing parties than for the left; however, the difference was not statistically significant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: European Journal of Political Research specialises in articles articulating theoretical and comparative perspectives in political science, and welcomes both quantitative and qualitative approaches. EJPR also publishes short research notes outlining ongoing research in more specific areas of research. The Journal includes the Political Data Yearbook, published as a double issue at the end of each volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信