对新关注污染物进行水质监测的生态毒理学相关方法

IF 2.6 Q2 WATER RESOURCES
H. Schoenfuss, A. Kolok
{"title":"对新关注污染物进行水质监测的生态毒理学相关方法","authors":"H. Schoenfuss, A. Kolok","doi":"10.3389/frwa.2023.1333165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs) have been documented across the seven continents, including Antarctica, and are likely an impediment to the sustainable management of natural resources. Most studies to date have relied on sweeping chemistry surveys, reliant upon sophisticated instrumentation. This approach is expensive, relies on limited laboratory capacity, and generates results that are spatially and temporally constrained. Here we review existing approaches that can overcome these limitations by focusing on effects-based monitoring. Passive samplers can generate long-term records regarding the occurrence of CECs. As samples are concentrated, their analysis can be achieved using equipment that will be more common and less expensive. A second approach involves rapid test methods for single compounds, including test strips, ELISA assays, and mobile phone-based analytic tools. These can provide inexpensive CEC presence data for many field sites and can be used to stratify sampling and thereby reduce cost. Identifying the presence of a single compound can often shed light on the likely presence of entire groups of chemicals. Pairing these chemistry-derived approaches with geospatial modeling to predict CEC presence and concentrations across watersheds has already been applied in several large watersheds. Utilizing available ecotoxicological knowledge bases provides an opportunity to link modeled CEC occurrence and concentrations with likely adverse biological responses. Finally, confirmatory on-site exposure experiments can corroborate the presence or absence of biological effects hypothesized from the above chain of evidence to provide natural resource managers with information to make conservation decisions.","PeriodicalId":33801,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Water","volume":"54 s266","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An ecotoxicologically relevant approach to water quality monitoring for contaminants of emerging concern\",\"authors\":\"H. Schoenfuss, A. Kolok\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frwa.2023.1333165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs) have been documented across the seven continents, including Antarctica, and are likely an impediment to the sustainable management of natural resources. Most studies to date have relied on sweeping chemistry surveys, reliant upon sophisticated instrumentation. This approach is expensive, relies on limited laboratory capacity, and generates results that are spatially and temporally constrained. Here we review existing approaches that can overcome these limitations by focusing on effects-based monitoring. Passive samplers can generate long-term records regarding the occurrence of CECs. As samples are concentrated, their analysis can be achieved using equipment that will be more common and less expensive. A second approach involves rapid test methods for single compounds, including test strips, ELISA assays, and mobile phone-based analytic tools. These can provide inexpensive CEC presence data for many field sites and can be used to stratify sampling and thereby reduce cost. Identifying the presence of a single compound can often shed light on the likely presence of entire groups of chemicals. Pairing these chemistry-derived approaches with geospatial modeling to predict CEC presence and concentrations across watersheds has already been applied in several large watersheds. Utilizing available ecotoxicological knowledge bases provides an opportunity to link modeled CEC occurrence and concentrations with likely adverse biological responses. Finally, confirmatory on-site exposure experiments can corroborate the presence or absence of biological effects hypothesized from the above chain of evidence to provide natural resource managers with information to make conservation decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Water\",\"volume\":\"54 s266\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Water\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2023.1333165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2023.1333165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

包括南极洲在内的七大洲都有新发现的污染物(CECs),它们很可能会阻碍自然资源的可持续管理。迄今为止,大多数研究都依赖于精密仪器进行的全面化学调查。这种方法成本高昂,依靠的实验室能力有限,得出的结果在空间和时间上都受到限制。在此,我们回顾了可以克服这些局限性的现有方法,重点是基于效应的监测。被动采样器可生成有关 CECs 发生情况的长期记录。随着样本的集中,可以使用更常见、更便宜的设备对其进行分析。第二种方法涉及单种化合物的快速检测方法,包括试纸、ELISA 检测法和基于手机的分析工具。这些方法可为许多实地地点提供廉价的 CEC 存在数据,并可用于分层取样,从而降低成本。识别单个化合物的存在通常可以揭示整个化学品组可能存在的情况。将这些化学方法与地理空间建模相结合,以预测整个流域中是否存在 CEC 及其浓度,已在多个大型流域中得到应用。利用现有的生态毒理学知识库,有机会将建模的 CEC 出现和浓度与可能的不良生物反应联系起来。最后,确认性现场暴露实验可以证实上述证据链中假设的生物效应存在与否,从而为自然资源管理者提供信息,帮助他们做出保护决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An ecotoxicologically relevant approach to water quality monitoring for contaminants of emerging concern
Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs) have been documented across the seven continents, including Antarctica, and are likely an impediment to the sustainable management of natural resources. Most studies to date have relied on sweeping chemistry surveys, reliant upon sophisticated instrumentation. This approach is expensive, relies on limited laboratory capacity, and generates results that are spatially and temporally constrained. Here we review existing approaches that can overcome these limitations by focusing on effects-based monitoring. Passive samplers can generate long-term records regarding the occurrence of CECs. As samples are concentrated, their analysis can be achieved using equipment that will be more common and less expensive. A second approach involves rapid test methods for single compounds, including test strips, ELISA assays, and mobile phone-based analytic tools. These can provide inexpensive CEC presence data for many field sites and can be used to stratify sampling and thereby reduce cost. Identifying the presence of a single compound can often shed light on the likely presence of entire groups of chemicals. Pairing these chemistry-derived approaches with geospatial modeling to predict CEC presence and concentrations across watersheds has already been applied in several large watersheds. Utilizing available ecotoxicological knowledge bases provides an opportunity to link modeled CEC occurrence and concentrations with likely adverse biological responses. Finally, confirmatory on-site exposure experiments can corroborate the presence or absence of biological effects hypothesized from the above chain of evidence to provide natural resource managers with information to make conservation decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Water
Frontiers in Water WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
224
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信