评估梅拉和罗杰斯词汇能力测验的有效性:拉氏测量模型分析

Q3 Social Sciences
Reza Nejati, Mohsen Jabbari
{"title":"评估梅拉和罗杰斯词汇能力测验的有效性:拉氏测量模型分析","authors":"Reza Nejati, Mohsen Jabbari","doi":"10.33736/ils.5290.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Language aptitude tests, such as the LLAMA_ B3, developed by Meara and Rogers (2022), may play an important role in vocabulary learning research. Following Bokander & Bylund's (2019) advice, the construct validity of this test is examined here. Data collected from 314 participants were analyzed using Rasch analysis. All the eigenvalues fall below 2, supporting the assumption of uni-dimensionality. Q3 findings help us claim that the assumption of local independence has been met. This study found a .96 and a .84 reliability for the items and the participants, respectively. There was a convergent estimate of the results (Variance-Covariance Matrix: +2.002 and -2 log likelihood=+11.458.300). Accordingly, the test is valid for the present sample of students. As far as the analysis shows, the items represent a single underlying construct, meaning that the LLAMA_ B3 is fundamentally coherent. Psychometrically, a single trait seems to have been identified. It can be concluded that both the items and participants behaved predictably, indicating that the test is certainly worth further investigation and refinement.","PeriodicalId":36177,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Language Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUATING THE VALIDITY OF MEARA AND ROGERS’ VOCABULARY APTITUDE TEST: A RASCH MEASUREMENT MODEL ANALYSIS\",\"authors\":\"Reza Nejati, Mohsen Jabbari\",\"doi\":\"10.33736/ils.5290.2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Language aptitude tests, such as the LLAMA_ B3, developed by Meara and Rogers (2022), may play an important role in vocabulary learning research. Following Bokander & Bylund's (2019) advice, the construct validity of this test is examined here. Data collected from 314 participants were analyzed using Rasch analysis. All the eigenvalues fall below 2, supporting the assumption of uni-dimensionality. Q3 findings help us claim that the assumption of local independence has been met. This study found a .96 and a .84 reliability for the items and the participants, respectively. There was a convergent estimate of the results (Variance-Covariance Matrix: +2.002 and -2 log likelihood=+11.458.300). Accordingly, the test is valid for the present sample of students. As far as the analysis shows, the items represent a single underlying construct, meaning that the LLAMA_ B3 is fundamentally coherent. Psychometrically, a single trait seems to have been identified. It can be concluded that both the items and participants behaved predictably, indicating that the test is certainly worth further investigation and refinement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Issues in Language Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Issues in Language Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.5290.2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.5290.2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语言能力测试,如 Meara 和 Rogers(2022 年)开发的 LLAMA_ B3,可能会在词汇学习研究中发挥重要作用。根据 Bokander & Bylund(2019)的建议,本文对该测试的建构效度进行了研究。我们使用拉施分析法对从 314 名参与者那里收集到的数据进行了分析。所有特征值均低于 2,支持单维假设。第三季度的研究结果帮助我们确定了局部独立性假设的成立。本研究发现,项目和参与者的信度分别为 0.96 和 0.84。对结果进行了收敛估计(方差-协方差矩阵:+2.002 和-2 对数似然=+11.458.300)。因此,该测试对本样本学生有效。分析表明,这些项目代表了一个单一的基本结构,这意味着 LLAMA_ B3 从根本上是一致的。从心理测量学的角度看,似乎已经确定了一个单一的特质。可以得出的结论是,项目和参与者的表现都是可以预测的,这表明该测试无疑值得进一步研究和完善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EVALUATING THE VALIDITY OF MEARA AND ROGERS’ VOCABULARY APTITUDE TEST: A RASCH MEASUREMENT MODEL ANALYSIS
Language aptitude tests, such as the LLAMA_ B3, developed by Meara and Rogers (2022), may play an important role in vocabulary learning research. Following Bokander & Bylund's (2019) advice, the construct validity of this test is examined here. Data collected from 314 participants were analyzed using Rasch analysis. All the eigenvalues fall below 2, supporting the assumption of uni-dimensionality. Q3 findings help us claim that the assumption of local independence has been met. This study found a .96 and a .84 reliability for the items and the participants, respectively. There was a convergent estimate of the results (Variance-Covariance Matrix: +2.002 and -2 log likelihood=+11.458.300). Accordingly, the test is valid for the present sample of students. As far as the analysis shows, the items represent a single underlying construct, meaning that the LLAMA_ B3 is fundamentally coherent. Psychometrically, a single trait seems to have been identified. It can be concluded that both the items and participants behaved predictably, indicating that the test is certainly worth further investigation and refinement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Issues in Language Studies
Issues in Language Studies Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信