Hira Ghani, Samavia Khan, Alicia Podwojniak, Fatima N. Mirza, Elizabeth Richards, Odera Ekeh, Erica DeCecco, Khalil Khatri
{"title":"治疗常见皮肤病时与烧蚀激光相关的不良反应:对 946 名患者的系统性研究","authors":"Hira Ghani, Samavia Khan, Alicia Podwojniak, Fatima N. Mirza, Elizabeth Richards, Odera Ekeh, Erica DeCecco, Khalil Khatri","doi":"10.4081/ltj.2023.378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CO2 and Er:YAG are the two most common types of ablative lasers in use today. Ablative lasers are known for their superior efficacy in penetrating deeper through the skin layers when compared to non-ablative lasers. This review compares the outcomes and adverse events associated with CO2 and Er: YAG lasers, in conjunction with other therapeutic modalities, in the treatment of common skin conditions. A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of PubMed and Embase databases was conducted from January 2012 to December 2022. Study types that were eligible for this review included clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, case reports, case series, cohort studies, and meta-analyses. The study protocol was registered (PROSPERO 2022: CRD42022348569). The search strategy produced 27 studies comprising 946 patients who were treated for acne scars, postacne hyperpigmentation, solar lentigines, facial rejuvenation, refractory vitiligo, and epidermal verrucous nevi. Erythema, pain, and hyperpigmentation were the most commonly reported adverse effects. A higher rate of adverse events was observed in CO2 laser therapies (n=610, 64.5%) when compared to Er: YAG and other laser cohorts (n=40, 4.2%). Both CO2 and Er: YAG lasers demonstrate similar efficacy in the treatment of benign cutaneous conditions. Further research is needed for parallel comparison of CO2 and Er: YAG lasers.","PeriodicalId":17981,"journal":{"name":"Laser therapy","volume":"53 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse effects associated with ablative lasers when treating common dermatologic conditions: a systematic review of 946 patients\",\"authors\":\"Hira Ghani, Samavia Khan, Alicia Podwojniak, Fatima N. Mirza, Elizabeth Richards, Odera Ekeh, Erica DeCecco, Khalil Khatri\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/ltj.2023.378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CO2 and Er:YAG are the two most common types of ablative lasers in use today. Ablative lasers are known for their superior efficacy in penetrating deeper through the skin layers when compared to non-ablative lasers. This review compares the outcomes and adverse events associated with CO2 and Er: YAG lasers, in conjunction with other therapeutic modalities, in the treatment of common skin conditions. A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of PubMed and Embase databases was conducted from January 2012 to December 2022. Study types that were eligible for this review included clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, case reports, case series, cohort studies, and meta-analyses. The study protocol was registered (PROSPERO 2022: CRD42022348569). The search strategy produced 27 studies comprising 946 patients who were treated for acne scars, postacne hyperpigmentation, solar lentigines, facial rejuvenation, refractory vitiligo, and epidermal verrucous nevi. Erythema, pain, and hyperpigmentation were the most commonly reported adverse effects. A higher rate of adverse events was observed in CO2 laser therapies (n=610, 64.5%) when compared to Er: YAG and other laser cohorts (n=40, 4.2%). Both CO2 and Er: YAG lasers demonstrate similar efficacy in the treatment of benign cutaneous conditions. Further research is needed for parallel comparison of CO2 and Er: YAG lasers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laser therapy\",\"volume\":\"53 13\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laser therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/ltj.2023.378\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laser therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ltj.2023.378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
CO2 和 Er:YAG 是目前最常用的两种烧蚀激光。与非烧蚀激光相比,烧蚀激光在穿透皮肤深层方面具有卓越的功效。本综述比较了 CO2 和 Er: YAG 激光与其他治疗方式结合治疗常见皮肤病的效果和不良事件。2012年1月至2022年12月,我们对PubMed和Embase数据库进行了符合PRISMA标准的系统性综述。符合综述条件的研究类型包括临床试验、随机对照试验、病例报告、系列病例、队列研究和荟萃分析。研究方案已注册(PROSPERO 2022:CRD42022348569)。通过搜索策略,共收集到 27 项研究,涉及 946 名患者,这些患者接受了痤疮疤痕、痤疮后色素沉着、日光性色斑、面部年轻化、难治性白癜风和表皮疣状痣的治疗。红斑、疼痛和色素沉着是最常见的不良反应。与Er: YAG和其他激光疗法(40例,4.2%)相比,CO2激光疗法的不良反应发生率更高(610例,64.5%)。二氧化碳激光和 Er: YAG 激光在治疗良性皮肤病方面的疗效相似。要对 CO2 和 Er: YAG 激光进行平行比较,还需要进一步的研究。
Adverse effects associated with ablative lasers when treating common dermatologic conditions: a systematic review of 946 patients
CO2 and Er:YAG are the two most common types of ablative lasers in use today. Ablative lasers are known for their superior efficacy in penetrating deeper through the skin layers when compared to non-ablative lasers. This review compares the outcomes and adverse events associated with CO2 and Er: YAG lasers, in conjunction with other therapeutic modalities, in the treatment of common skin conditions. A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of PubMed and Embase databases was conducted from January 2012 to December 2022. Study types that were eligible for this review included clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, case reports, case series, cohort studies, and meta-analyses. The study protocol was registered (PROSPERO 2022: CRD42022348569). The search strategy produced 27 studies comprising 946 patients who were treated for acne scars, postacne hyperpigmentation, solar lentigines, facial rejuvenation, refractory vitiligo, and epidermal verrucous nevi. Erythema, pain, and hyperpigmentation were the most commonly reported adverse effects. A higher rate of adverse events was observed in CO2 laser therapies (n=610, 64.5%) when compared to Er: YAG and other laser cohorts (n=40, 4.2%). Both CO2 and Er: YAG lasers demonstrate similar efficacy in the treatment of benign cutaneous conditions. Further research is needed for parallel comparison of CO2 and Er: YAG lasers.