预期克服:司法判决作为审查有约束力条款的工具

Leonardo LAUB MARQUES
{"title":"预期克服:司法判决作为审查有约束力条款的工具","authors":"Leonardo LAUB MARQUES","doi":"10.35265/2236-6717-241-12891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the exposition of the current appeal procedure of exceptional appeals (introduced by Law n. 13.256 of 2016), the study intends to analyze the current methods and demands of the Brazilian binding precedents reviewing and overruling process, pointing out the problems the current system implicates, such as the difficulty for complainants to access Superior Courts and resultant obstacles to the litigants’ participation in precedents’ permanence discussions and its democratic legitimacy. Comparisons between the Brazilian system and that of common law countries are pondered in order to recognize a possible solution, which is to employ anticipatory overruling, by making use of specific revision interpretative techniques of the rule contained in the precedent.","PeriodicalId":21289,"journal":{"name":"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica","volume":"54 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SUPERAÇÃO ANTECIPATÓRIA: DECISÕES JUDICIAIS COMO INSTRUMENTO DE REVISÃO DE PROVIMENTOS VINCULANTES\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo LAUB MARQUES\",\"doi\":\"10.35265/2236-6717-241-12891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on the exposition of the current appeal procedure of exceptional appeals (introduced by Law n. 13.256 of 2016), the study intends to analyze the current methods and demands of the Brazilian binding precedents reviewing and overruling process, pointing out the problems the current system implicates, such as the difficulty for complainants to access Superior Courts and resultant obstacles to the litigants’ participation in precedents’ permanence discussions and its democratic legitimacy. Comparisons between the Brazilian system and that of common law countries are pondered in order to recognize a possible solution, which is to employ anticipatory overruling, by making use of specific revision interpretative techniques of the rule contained in the precedent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica\",\"volume\":\"54 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35265/2236-6717-241-12891\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35265/2236-6717-241-12891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于对现行特殊上诉程序(由2016年第13.256号法律引入)的阐述,本研究旨在分析巴西具有约束力的先例审查和推翻程序的现行方法和要求,指出现行制度所涉及的问题,如原告难以诉诸高级法院,以及由此导致的诉讼当事人参与先例永久性讨论的障碍及其民主合法性。对巴西的制度与普通法国家的制度进行了比较,以找出一种可能的解决方案,即通过利用对先例中所载规则的具体修订解释技术,采用预期推翻的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SUPERAÇÃO ANTECIPATÓRIA: DECISÕES JUDICIAIS COMO INSTRUMENTO DE REVISÃO DE PROVIMENTOS VINCULANTES
Based on the exposition of the current appeal procedure of exceptional appeals (introduced by Law n. 13.256 of 2016), the study intends to analyze the current methods and demands of the Brazilian binding precedents reviewing and overruling process, pointing out the problems the current system implicates, such as the difficulty for complainants to access Superior Courts and resultant obstacles to the litigants’ participation in precedents’ permanence discussions and its democratic legitimacy. Comparisons between the Brazilian system and that of common law countries are pondered in order to recognize a possible solution, which is to employ anticipatory overruling, by making use of specific revision interpretative techniques of the rule contained in the precedent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信