用于发电的创新型双级热电储热系统的性能评估和多目标优化

IF 8 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Ehsanolah Assareh , Saman Meshkinnezhad , Neha Agarwal , Alireza Baheri , Mehrdad Ahmadinejad , Mohammadali Behrang , Ali Sohani , Amirhossein Fathi , Tohid Jafarinejad , Moonyong Lee
{"title":"用于发电的创新型双级热电储热系统的性能评估和多目标优化","authors":"Ehsanolah Assareh ,&nbsp;Saman Meshkinnezhad ,&nbsp;Neha Agarwal ,&nbsp;Alireza Baheri ,&nbsp;Mehrdad Ahmadinejad ,&nbsp;Mohammadali Behrang ,&nbsp;Ali Sohani ,&nbsp;Amirhossein Fathi ,&nbsp;Tohid Jafarinejad ,&nbsp;Moonyong Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As the need for renewable energy continues to grow, there is an increasing requirement to utilize systems that offer enhanced performance and efficiency. Consequently, a comprehensive investigation is conducted on a two-stage thermoelectric heat pump. The primary objective is to assess the impact of various influential factors on the overall effectiveness of the system. This exhaustive parametric study aims to provide valuable insights into the system's performance and efficiency. Subsequently, the multi-objective optimization approach considers both technical and economic goal functions. By incorporating these two aspects, the optimization process seeks to achieve the most favorable balance between technical performance and economic feasibility. This allows for a holistic assessment that takes into consideration not only the system's efficiency and effectiveness but also its economic viability in real-world applications. The best optimal solution is discovered using a variety of methods for multi-objective optimization. The optimized system is examined from both an exergy and an exergoeconomic vantage point after the best optimal solution has been identified by comparing the results of various methodologies. The outcomes demonstrate that for the multidimensional analysis of Linmap, the combination of multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) and the linear programming technique yields the best optimal solution. The objective functions for this final optimal solution are unit cost of heating power and exergy efficiency, which are defined as 1.91 and 51.28 USD/(kWh), respectively. The results showed that the optimal current for temperature changes of 10, 20, and 30 K is 2.84, 5.53, and 8.1 respectively. Also, the optimal length and number of thermocouples were 0.0055 m, 30, and 15 m respectively in all techniques. The optimal current changes from 23.30 to 27.60 A, which indicates that the optimization technique prefers to adjust the current over other effective parameters. When the thermocouples in the first and second stages are 30 and 15 pairs, respectively, according to the design parameters of the ideal point, the system will work at its peak efficiency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427123000906/pdfft?md5=b6161eabb66f7275f14a7d9251c929a8&pid=1-s2.0-S2772427123000906-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation and multi-objective optimization of an innovative double-stage thermoelectric heat storage system for electricity generation\",\"authors\":\"Ehsanolah Assareh ,&nbsp;Saman Meshkinnezhad ,&nbsp;Neha Agarwal ,&nbsp;Alireza Baheri ,&nbsp;Mehrdad Ahmadinejad ,&nbsp;Mohammadali Behrang ,&nbsp;Ali Sohani ,&nbsp;Amirhossein Fathi ,&nbsp;Tohid Jafarinejad ,&nbsp;Moonyong Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As the need for renewable energy continues to grow, there is an increasing requirement to utilize systems that offer enhanced performance and efficiency. Consequently, a comprehensive investigation is conducted on a two-stage thermoelectric heat pump. The primary objective is to assess the impact of various influential factors on the overall effectiveness of the system. This exhaustive parametric study aims to provide valuable insights into the system's performance and efficiency. Subsequently, the multi-objective optimization approach considers both technical and economic goal functions. By incorporating these two aspects, the optimization process seeks to achieve the most favorable balance between technical performance and economic feasibility. This allows for a holistic assessment that takes into consideration not only the system's efficiency and effectiveness but also its economic viability in real-world applications. The best optimal solution is discovered using a variety of methods for multi-objective optimization. The optimized system is examined from both an exergy and an exergoeconomic vantage point after the best optimal solution has been identified by comparing the results of various methodologies. The outcomes demonstrate that for the multidimensional analysis of Linmap, the combination of multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) and the linear programming technique yields the best optimal solution. The objective functions for this final optimal solution are unit cost of heating power and exergy efficiency, which are defined as 1.91 and 51.28 USD/(kWh), respectively. The results showed that the optimal current for temperature changes of 10, 20, and 30 K is 2.84, 5.53, and 8.1 respectively. Also, the optimal length and number of thermocouples were 0.0055 m, 30, and 15 m respectively in all techniques. The optimal current changes from 23.30 to 27.60 A, which indicates that the optimization technique prefers to adjust the current over other effective parameters. When the thermocouples in the first and second stages are 30 and 15 pairs, respectively, according to the design parameters of the ideal point, the system will work at its peak efficiency.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy nexus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427123000906/pdfft?md5=b6161eabb66f7275f14a7d9251c929a8&pid=1-s2.0-S2772427123000906-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy nexus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427123000906\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427123000906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着对可再生能源需求的不断增长,人们越来越需要使用性能和效率更高的系统。因此,我们对双级热电热泵进行了全面调查。主要目的是评估各种影响因素对系统整体效率的影响。这项详尽的参数研究旨在为系统的性能和效率提供有价值的见解。随后,多目标优化方法同时考虑了技术和经济目标函数。通过结合这两个方面,优化过程力求在技术性能和经济可行性之间实现最有利的平衡。这样就可以进行整体评估,不仅考虑到系统的效率和效果,还考虑到其在实际应用中的经济可行性。使用各种多目标优化方法,可以找到最佳的最优解决方案。通过比较各种方法的结果,在确定最佳优化方案后,从能量和经济角度对优化系统进行审查。结果表明,对于林地图的多维分析,多目标粒子群优化(MOPSO)和线性规划技术的结合产生了最佳的最优解。该最终最优解的目标函数为单位热功率成本和放能效率,分别定义为 1.91 美元/(千瓦时)和 51.28 美元/(千瓦时)。结果显示,温度变化为 10、20 和 30 K 时的最佳电流分别为 2.84、5.53 和 8.1。此外,在所有技术中,热电偶的最佳长度和数量分别为 0.0055 米、30 米和 15 米。最佳电流从 23.30 A 变为 27.60 A,这表明优化技术更倾向于调整电流而不是其他有效参数。根据理想点的设计参数,当第一级和第二级的热电偶分别为 30 对和 15 对时,系统将以最高效率工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance evaluation and multi-objective optimization of an innovative double-stage thermoelectric heat storage system for electricity generation

As the need for renewable energy continues to grow, there is an increasing requirement to utilize systems that offer enhanced performance and efficiency. Consequently, a comprehensive investigation is conducted on a two-stage thermoelectric heat pump. The primary objective is to assess the impact of various influential factors on the overall effectiveness of the system. This exhaustive parametric study aims to provide valuable insights into the system's performance and efficiency. Subsequently, the multi-objective optimization approach considers both technical and economic goal functions. By incorporating these two aspects, the optimization process seeks to achieve the most favorable balance between technical performance and economic feasibility. This allows for a holistic assessment that takes into consideration not only the system's efficiency and effectiveness but also its economic viability in real-world applications. The best optimal solution is discovered using a variety of methods for multi-objective optimization. The optimized system is examined from both an exergy and an exergoeconomic vantage point after the best optimal solution has been identified by comparing the results of various methodologies. The outcomes demonstrate that for the multidimensional analysis of Linmap, the combination of multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) and the linear programming technique yields the best optimal solution. The objective functions for this final optimal solution are unit cost of heating power and exergy efficiency, which are defined as 1.91 and 51.28 USD/(kWh), respectively. The results showed that the optimal current for temperature changes of 10, 20, and 30 K is 2.84, 5.53, and 8.1 respectively. Also, the optimal length and number of thermocouples were 0.0055 m, 30, and 15 m respectively in all techniques. The optimal current changes from 23.30 to 27.60 A, which indicates that the optimization technique prefers to adjust the current over other effective parameters. When the thermocouples in the first and second stages are 30 and 15 pairs, respectively, according to the design parameters of the ideal point, the system will work at its peak efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信