CareSens Air 15 天连续血糖监测系统的准确性和安全性。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes technology & therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-13 DOI:10.1089/dia.2023.0468
Kyung-Soo Kim, Seung-Hwan Lee, Won Sang Yoo, Cheol-Young Park
{"title":"CareSens Air 15 天连续血糖监测系统的准确性和安全性。","authors":"Kyung-Soo Kim, Seung-Hwan Lee, Won Sang Yoo, Cheol-Young Park","doi":"10.1089/dia.2023.0468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> We evaluated the accuracy and safety of the CareSens Air, a novel real-time continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS), during 15 days of use in adults with diabetes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Adults with either type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes requiring intensive insulin therapy participated at four sites in South Korea. All participants wore the sensor for 15 days. Participants were scheduled for four 8-h clinic sessions on Day 1, 5 ± 1, 10 ± 1, and 15. Accuracy was evaluated based on the proportion of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) values within 15% of YSI values ≥100 mg/dL or within 15 mg/dL of YSI values <100 mg/dL (%15/15), along with the %20/20, %30/30, and %40/40 agreement rates. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) between the CGM and YSI values was calculated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Data from 83 participants (83 sensors, 10,029 CGM-YSI matched pairs) were analyzed. The overall MARD was 10.42%, and the overall %15/15, %20/20, %30/30, and %40/40 accuracy were 78.55%, 89.04%, 96.47%, and 98.87%, respectively. The consensus error grid analysis showed that 99.92% of CGM values fell into Zone A or B (Zone A: 89.83%, Zone B: 10.09%). The %20/20 accuracy of CGMS was 88.11% on Day 1, 90.11% on Day 3-5, 92.09% on Day 8-10, and 85.63% on Day 15. No serious adverse events were reported. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The CareSens Air demonstrated accurate performance across the wide glycemic range and was well tolerated during the 15-day sensor use period.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10979678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy and Safety of the 15-Day CareSens Air Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.\",\"authors\":\"Kyung-Soo Kim, Seung-Hwan Lee, Won Sang Yoo, Cheol-Young Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/dia.2023.0468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> We evaluated the accuracy and safety of the CareSens Air, a novel real-time continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS), during 15 days of use in adults with diabetes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Adults with either type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes requiring intensive insulin therapy participated at four sites in South Korea. All participants wore the sensor for 15 days. Participants were scheduled for four 8-h clinic sessions on Day 1, 5 ± 1, 10 ± 1, and 15. Accuracy was evaluated based on the proportion of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) values within 15% of YSI values ≥100 mg/dL or within 15 mg/dL of YSI values <100 mg/dL (%15/15), along with the %20/20, %30/30, and %40/40 agreement rates. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) between the CGM and YSI values was calculated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Data from 83 participants (83 sensors, 10,029 CGM-YSI matched pairs) were analyzed. The overall MARD was 10.42%, and the overall %15/15, %20/20, %30/30, and %40/40 accuracy were 78.55%, 89.04%, 96.47%, and 98.87%, respectively. The consensus error grid analysis showed that 99.92% of CGM values fell into Zone A or B (Zone A: 89.83%, Zone B: 10.09%). The %20/20 accuracy of CGMS was 88.11% on Day 1, 90.11% on Day 3-5, 92.09% on Day 8-10, and 85.63% on Day 15. No serious adverse events were reported. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The CareSens Air demonstrated accurate performance across the wide glycemic range and was well tolerated during the 15-day sensor use period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10979678/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2023.0468\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2023.0468","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们对新型实时连续血糖监测(CGM)系统 CareSens Air 在成人糖尿病患者中使用 15 天的准确性和安全性进行了评估:在韩国的四个地点,患有 1 型糖尿病或需要强化胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病的成人参加了此次评估。所有参与者均佩戴传感器 15 天。参与者分别在第 1 天、第 5 ± 1 天、第 10 ± 1 天和第 15 天进行了四次 8 小时的门诊。准确性根据 CGM 值在 YSI 值≥100 mg/dL 的 15% 或 YSI 值 <100 mg/dL 的 15 mg/dL 范围内的比例(%15/15),以及 %20/20、%30/30 和 %40/40 的一致率进行评估。计算 CGM 和 YSI 值之间的平均绝对相对差值 (MARD):分析了 83 名参与者(83 个传感器,10,029 个 CGM-YSI 配对)的数据。总体 MARD 为 10.42%,总体 %15/15、%20/20、%30/30 和 %40/40 的准确率分别为 78.55%、89.04%、96.47% 和 98.87%。共识误差网格分析显示,99.92% 的 CGM 值属于 A 区或 B 区(A 区:89.83%,B 区:10.09%)。第 1 天 CGMS 的 20/20% 准确率为 88.11%,第 3-5 天为 90.11%,第 8-10 天为 92.09%,第 15 天为 85.63%。无严重不良事件报告:CareSens Air 在广泛的血糖范围内均表现出准确的性能,并且在 15 天的传感器使用期内耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy and Safety of the 15-Day CareSens Air Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.

Background: We evaluated the accuracy and safety of the CareSens Air, a novel real-time continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS), during 15 days of use in adults with diabetes. Methods: Adults with either type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes requiring intensive insulin therapy participated at four sites in South Korea. All participants wore the sensor for 15 days. Participants were scheduled for four 8-h clinic sessions on Day 1, 5 ± 1, 10 ± 1, and 15. Accuracy was evaluated based on the proportion of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) values within 15% of YSI values ≥100 mg/dL or within 15 mg/dL of YSI values <100 mg/dL (%15/15), along with the %20/20, %30/30, and %40/40 agreement rates. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) between the CGM and YSI values was calculated. Results: Data from 83 participants (83 sensors, 10,029 CGM-YSI matched pairs) were analyzed. The overall MARD was 10.42%, and the overall %15/15, %20/20, %30/30, and %40/40 accuracy were 78.55%, 89.04%, 96.47%, and 98.87%, respectively. The consensus error grid analysis showed that 99.92% of CGM values fell into Zone A or B (Zone A: 89.83%, Zone B: 10.09%). The %20/20 accuracy of CGMS was 88.11% on Day 1, 90.11% on Day 3-5, 92.09% on Day 8-10, and 85.63% on Day 15. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: The CareSens Air demonstrated accurate performance across the wide glycemic range and was well tolerated during the 15-day sensor use period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信